TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of implant surface characteristics on the initiation, progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal model studies
AU - Garaicoa-Pazmino, Carlos
AU - Lin, Guo Hao
AU - Alkandery, Aaeshah
AU - Parra-Carrasquer, Carlos
AU - Amo, Fernando Suarez Lopez Del
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the impact of implant surface characteristics on the initiation, progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis based exclusively on in vivo investigations. Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted by two independent reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify animal studies comparing at least two different implant surfaces affected by experimental peri-implantitis, with distinct characteristics and with or without subsequent surgical treatment that aims to arrest disease progression. The parameters evaluated included both radiographic (e.g., marginal bone level) and clinical (e.g., probing depth, bleeding on probing) aspects to determine changes in disease progression and treatment outcomes. Results: No statistically significant differences were found among the different implant surfaces during the initiation of peri-implantitis. On the other hand, the progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis displayed statistically significant differences among the different implant systems, with turned surfaces reporting less bone loss during the progression period and greater bone gain after treatment. Conclusions: Implant surface characteristics play a critical role in the progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis. Turned implant surfaces demonstrated the least amount of bone loss after ligature removal and recorded the most favourable treatment outcomes.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the impact of implant surface characteristics on the initiation, progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis based exclusively on in vivo investigations. Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted by two independent reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify animal studies comparing at least two different implant surfaces affected by experimental peri-implantitis, with distinct characteristics and with or without subsequent surgical treatment that aims to arrest disease progression. The parameters evaluated included both radiographic (e.g., marginal bone level) and clinical (e.g., probing depth, bleeding on probing) aspects to determine changes in disease progression and treatment outcomes. Results: No statistically significant differences were found among the different implant surfaces during the initiation of peri-implantitis. On the other hand, the progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis displayed statistically significant differences among the different implant systems, with turned surfaces reporting less bone loss during the progression period and greater bone gain after treatment. Conclusions: Implant surface characteristics play a critical role in the progression and treatment outcomes of peri-implantitis. Turned implant surfaces demonstrated the least amount of bone loss after ligature removal and recorded the most favourable treatment outcomes.
KW - alveolar bone loss
KW - dental implants
KW - peri-implantitis
KW - review (systematic)
KW - surface roughness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121474789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121474789&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 34726847
AN - SCOPUS:85121474789
SN - 2631-6420
VL - 14
SP - 367
EP - 382
JO - International Journal of Oral Implantology
JF - International Journal of Oral Implantology
IS - 4
ER -