Inertial Sensor-Based Assessment of Central Sensory Integration for Balance after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Geetanjali Gera, Jim Chesnutt, Martina Mancini, Fay Horak, Laurie King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Optimal balance control requires a complex integration of sensory information from the visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The goal of this study is to determine if the instrumented modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) was impaired acutely after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) when postural sway under varying sensory conditions was measured with a wearable inertial sensor. Materials and Methods Postural sway was assessed in athletes who had sustained a mTBI within the past 2-3 d (n = 38) and control athletes (n = 81). Postural sway was quantified with a wearable inertial sensor (Opal; APDM, Inc.) during four varying sensory conditions of quiet stance: (1) eyes open (EO) firm surface, (2) eyes closed (EC) firm surface, (3) eyes open (EO) foam surface, and (4) eyes closed (EC) foam surface. Sensory reweighting deficits were computed by comparing the postural sway area in eyes closed versus eyes open conditions for firm and foam condition. Results Postural sway was higher for mTBI compared with the control group during three of the four conditions of instrumented mCTSIB (EO firm, EC firm, and EC foam; p < 0.05). Sensory reweighting deficits were evident for mTBI individuals compared with control group on foam surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p < 0.05) and not on firm surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p = 0.63). Conclusions The results from this study highlight the importance of detecting postural sway deficits during sensorimotor integration in mild TBI individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-332
Number of pages6
JournalMilitary Medicine
Volume183
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brain Concussion
Athletes
Control Groups

Keywords

  • body-worn inertial sensors
  • mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)
  • modified Clinical Test for Sensory Integration for Balance (mCTSIB)
  • postural sway

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Inertial Sensor-Based Assessment of Central Sensory Integration for Balance after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. / Gera, Geetanjali; Chesnutt, Jim; Mancini, Martina; Horak, Fay; King, Laurie.

In: Military Medicine, Vol. 183, 01.03.2018, p. 327-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea70b894c2134833874ddcd49dab6af7,
title = "Inertial Sensor-Based Assessment of Central Sensory Integration for Balance after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury",
abstract = "Introduction Optimal balance control requires a complex integration of sensory information from the visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The goal of this study is to determine if the instrumented modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) was impaired acutely after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) when postural sway under varying sensory conditions was measured with a wearable inertial sensor. Materials and Methods Postural sway was assessed in athletes who had sustained a mTBI within the past 2-3 d (n = 38) and control athletes (n = 81). Postural sway was quantified with a wearable inertial sensor (Opal; APDM, Inc.) during four varying sensory conditions of quiet stance: (1) eyes open (EO) firm surface, (2) eyes closed (EC) firm surface, (3) eyes open (EO) foam surface, and (4) eyes closed (EC) foam surface. Sensory reweighting deficits were computed by comparing the postural sway area in eyes closed versus eyes open conditions for firm and foam condition. Results Postural sway was higher for mTBI compared with the control group during three of the four conditions of instrumented mCTSIB (EO firm, EC firm, and EC foam; p < 0.05). Sensory reweighting deficits were evident for mTBI individuals compared with control group on foam surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p < 0.05) and not on firm surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p = 0.63). Conclusions The results from this study highlight the importance of detecting postural sway deficits during sensorimotor integration in mild TBI individuals.",
keywords = "body-worn inertial sensors, mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), modified Clinical Test for Sensory Integration for Balance (mCTSIB), postural sway",
author = "Geetanjali Gera and Jim Chesnutt and Martina Mancini and Fay Horak and Laurie King",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/milmed/usx162",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "183",
pages = "327--332",
journal = "Military Medicine",
issn = "0026-4075",
publisher = "Association of Military Surgeons of the US",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inertial Sensor-Based Assessment of Central Sensory Integration for Balance after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

AU - Gera, Geetanjali

AU - Chesnutt, Jim

AU - Mancini, Martina

AU - Horak, Fay

AU - King, Laurie

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Introduction Optimal balance control requires a complex integration of sensory information from the visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The goal of this study is to determine if the instrumented modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) was impaired acutely after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) when postural sway under varying sensory conditions was measured with a wearable inertial sensor. Materials and Methods Postural sway was assessed in athletes who had sustained a mTBI within the past 2-3 d (n = 38) and control athletes (n = 81). Postural sway was quantified with a wearable inertial sensor (Opal; APDM, Inc.) during four varying sensory conditions of quiet stance: (1) eyes open (EO) firm surface, (2) eyes closed (EC) firm surface, (3) eyes open (EO) foam surface, and (4) eyes closed (EC) foam surface. Sensory reweighting deficits were computed by comparing the postural sway area in eyes closed versus eyes open conditions for firm and foam condition. Results Postural sway was higher for mTBI compared with the control group during three of the four conditions of instrumented mCTSIB (EO firm, EC firm, and EC foam; p < 0.05). Sensory reweighting deficits were evident for mTBI individuals compared with control group on foam surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p < 0.05) and not on firm surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p = 0.63). Conclusions The results from this study highlight the importance of detecting postural sway deficits during sensorimotor integration in mild TBI individuals.

AB - Introduction Optimal balance control requires a complex integration of sensory information from the visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The goal of this study is to determine if the instrumented modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) was impaired acutely after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) when postural sway under varying sensory conditions was measured with a wearable inertial sensor. Materials and Methods Postural sway was assessed in athletes who had sustained a mTBI within the past 2-3 d (n = 38) and control athletes (n = 81). Postural sway was quantified with a wearable inertial sensor (Opal; APDM, Inc.) during four varying sensory conditions of quiet stance: (1) eyes open (EO) firm surface, (2) eyes closed (EC) firm surface, (3) eyes open (EO) foam surface, and (4) eyes closed (EC) foam surface. Sensory reweighting deficits were computed by comparing the postural sway area in eyes closed versus eyes open conditions for firm and foam condition. Results Postural sway was higher for mTBI compared with the control group during three of the four conditions of instrumented mCTSIB (EO firm, EC firm, and EC foam; p < 0.05). Sensory reweighting deficits were evident for mTBI individuals compared with control group on foam surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p < 0.05) and not on firm surface (EC firm vs EO firm; p = 0.63). Conclusions The results from this study highlight the importance of detecting postural sway deficits during sensorimotor integration in mild TBI individuals.

KW - body-worn inertial sensors

KW - mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)

KW - modified Clinical Test for Sensory Integration for Balance (mCTSIB)

KW - postural sway

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045465822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045465822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/milmed/usx162

DO - 10.1093/milmed/usx162

M3 - Article

C2 - 29635623

AN - SCOPUS:85045465822

VL - 183

SP - 327

EP - 332

JO - Military Medicine

JF - Military Medicine

SN - 0026-4075

ER -