Indications for Spine surgery: Validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses

Brook I. Martin, Jon D. Lurie, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Richard A. Deyo, Tor D. Tosteson, James N. Weinstein, Sohail K. Mirza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective analysis of Medicare claims linked to a multicenter clinical trial. Objective: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) provided a unique opportunity to examine the validity of a claims-based algorithm for grouping patients by surgical indication. SPORT enrolled patients for lumbar disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. We compared the surgical indication derived from Medicare claims with that provided by SPORT surgeons, the "gold standard." Summary of Background Data: Administrative data are frequently used to report procedure rates, surgical safety outcomes, and costs in the management of spinal surgery. However, the accuracy of using diagnosis codes to classify patients by surgical indication has not been examined. Methods: Medicare claims were link to beneficiaries enrolled in SPORT. The sensitivity and specificity of 3 claims-based approaches to group patients on the basis of surgical indications were examined: (1) using the first listed diagnosis; (2) using all diagnoses independently; and (3) using a diagnosis hierarchy on the basis of the support for fusion surgery. Results: Medicare claims were obtained from 376 SPORT participants, including 21 with disc herniation, 183 with spinal stenosis, and 172 with degenerative spondylolisthesis. The hierarchical coding algorithm was the most accurate approach for classifying patients by surgical indication, with sensitivities of 76.2%, 88.1%, and 84.3% for disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis cohorts, respectively. The specificity was 98.3% for disc herniation, 83.2% for spinal stenosis, and 90.7% for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Misclassifications were primarily due to codes attributing more complex pathology to the case. Conclusion: Standardized approaches for using claims data to group patients accurately by surgical indications have widespread interest. We found that a hierarchical coding approach correctly classified more than 90% of spine patients into their respective SPORT cohorts. Therefore, claims data seem to be a reasonably valid approach to classifying patients by surgical indication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)769-779
Number of pages11
JournalSpine
Volume39
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 20 2014

Keywords

  • administrative data
  • back pain
  • sensitivity and specifi city
  • spine surgery
  • surgical indication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Indications for Spine surgery: Validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Martin, B. I., Lurie, J. D., Tosteson, A. N. A., Deyo, R. A., Tosteson, T. D., Weinstein, J. N., & Mirza, S. K. (2014). Indications for Spine surgery: Validation of an administrative coding algorithm to classify degenerative diagnoses. Spine, 39(9), 769-779. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000275