Increasing volume of distribution to the brain with interstitial infusion: Dose, rather than convection, might be the most important factor

Robert A. Kroll, Michael A. Pagel, Leslie Muldoon, Simon Roman-Goldstein, Edward Neuwelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

THE VOLUME OF distribution in tissue (V(t)) that can be achieved by direct interstitial infusion of therapeutic agents into brain is limited. The maintenance of a pressure gradient during interstitial infusion to establish fluid convection has been shown to increase the V(t) of small, medium, and large molecules. We have used monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds, superparamagnetic particles of sizes the same order of magnitude as virions, to investigate the effect of dose, the volume of infusate, and the time of infusion on the distribution of large molecules in rodent brain. Our initial study in rats (n = 6) replicated the results of a previously described report of convection-enhanced delivery in cats. At a constant rate and concentration, the V(t) increased in a linear fashion, proportional to the increases in time, volume, and dose. When using a constant rate and a constant concentration, however, it is unclear which variable or variables (dose, volume, infusion time) have the greatest influence on this effect. Therefore, we assessed each variable independently (n = 12). When the iron dose was increased from 5.3 to 26.5 μg, there was a three- to fivefold increase in the V(t), depending on the volume and time of infusion (2 μl/20 min, 24 μl/20 min, or 24 μl/120 min) (P <0.001). When the volume of infusate was increased from 2 to 24 μl, at an infusion time of 20 minutes and a dose of either 5.3 or 26.5 μg, there was a 43 or 52% decline in the V(t), respectively (P = 0.018). When the time for the infusion of 24 μl was increased from 20 to 120 minutes, there was a 79% increase in the V(t) at a dose of 26.5 μg but no change in the V(t) at a dose of 5.3 μg. The effect associated with infusion time was not significant (P = 0.113). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in vivo, and histochemical staining for iron was used to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in tissue sections. The V(t) for both methods was calculated by computer image analysis, and the correlation between magnetic resonance and histological volumes was determined (r2 = 0.93). On the basis of this model, we suggest that dose, rather than convection, might be the most important variable in maximizing the V(t) and improved distribution might be achieved by administering an increased concentration of agent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)746-754
Number of pages9
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume38
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1996

Fingerprint

Convection
Brain
Iron
Tissue Distribution
Particle Size
Virion
Rodentia
Cats
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Maintenance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Staining and Labeling
Pressure

Keywords

  • Convection
  • Intracerebral infusion
  • Magnetic resonance
  • Monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompound
  • Volume of distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Increasing volume of distribution to the brain with interstitial infusion : Dose, rather than convection, might be the most important factor. / Kroll, Robert A.; Pagel, Michael A.; Muldoon, Leslie; Roman-Goldstein, Simon; Neuwelt, Edward.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 38, No. 4, 04.1996, p. 746-754.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d87c78eecaa41349f01b28af720856d,
title = "Increasing volume of distribution to the brain with interstitial infusion: Dose, rather than convection, might be the most important factor",
abstract = "THE VOLUME OF distribution in tissue (V(t)) that can be achieved by direct interstitial infusion of therapeutic agents into brain is limited. The maintenance of a pressure gradient during interstitial infusion to establish fluid convection has been shown to increase the V(t) of small, medium, and large molecules. We have used monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds, superparamagnetic particles of sizes the same order of magnitude as virions, to investigate the effect of dose, the volume of infusate, and the time of infusion on the distribution of large molecules in rodent brain. Our initial study in rats (n = 6) replicated the results of a previously described report of convection-enhanced delivery in cats. At a constant rate and concentration, the V(t) increased in a linear fashion, proportional to the increases in time, volume, and dose. When using a constant rate and a constant concentration, however, it is unclear which variable or variables (dose, volume, infusion time) have the greatest influence on this effect. Therefore, we assessed each variable independently (n = 12). When the iron dose was increased from 5.3 to 26.5 μg, there was a three- to fivefold increase in the V(t), depending on the volume and time of infusion (2 μl/20 min, 24 μl/20 min, or 24 μl/120 min) (P <0.001). When the volume of infusate was increased from 2 to 24 μl, at an infusion time of 20 minutes and a dose of either 5.3 or 26.5 μg, there was a 43 or 52{\%} decline in the V(t), respectively (P = 0.018). When the time for the infusion of 24 μl was increased from 20 to 120 minutes, there was a 79{\%} increase in the V(t) at a dose of 26.5 μg but no change in the V(t) at a dose of 5.3 μg. The effect associated with infusion time was not significant (P = 0.113). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in vivo, and histochemical staining for iron was used to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in tissue sections. The V(t) for both methods was calculated by computer image analysis, and the correlation between magnetic resonance and histological volumes was determined (r2 = 0.93). On the basis of this model, we suggest that dose, rather than convection, might be the most important variable in maximizing the V(t) and improved distribution might be achieved by administering an increased concentration of agent.",
keywords = "Convection, Intracerebral infusion, Magnetic resonance, Monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompound, Volume of distribution",
author = "Kroll, {Robert A.} and Pagel, {Michael A.} and Leslie Muldoon and Simon Roman-Goldstein and Edward Neuwelt",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "746--754",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing volume of distribution to the brain with interstitial infusion

T2 - Dose, rather than convection, might be the most important factor

AU - Kroll, Robert A.

AU - Pagel, Michael A.

AU - Muldoon, Leslie

AU - Roman-Goldstein, Simon

AU - Neuwelt, Edward

PY - 1996/4

Y1 - 1996/4

N2 - THE VOLUME OF distribution in tissue (V(t)) that can be achieved by direct interstitial infusion of therapeutic agents into brain is limited. The maintenance of a pressure gradient during interstitial infusion to establish fluid convection has been shown to increase the V(t) of small, medium, and large molecules. We have used monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds, superparamagnetic particles of sizes the same order of magnitude as virions, to investigate the effect of dose, the volume of infusate, and the time of infusion on the distribution of large molecules in rodent brain. Our initial study in rats (n = 6) replicated the results of a previously described report of convection-enhanced delivery in cats. At a constant rate and concentration, the V(t) increased in a linear fashion, proportional to the increases in time, volume, and dose. When using a constant rate and a constant concentration, however, it is unclear which variable or variables (dose, volume, infusion time) have the greatest influence on this effect. Therefore, we assessed each variable independently (n = 12). When the iron dose was increased from 5.3 to 26.5 μg, there was a three- to fivefold increase in the V(t), depending on the volume and time of infusion (2 μl/20 min, 24 μl/20 min, or 24 μl/120 min) (P <0.001). When the volume of infusate was increased from 2 to 24 μl, at an infusion time of 20 minutes and a dose of either 5.3 or 26.5 μg, there was a 43 or 52% decline in the V(t), respectively (P = 0.018). When the time for the infusion of 24 μl was increased from 20 to 120 minutes, there was a 79% increase in the V(t) at a dose of 26.5 μg but no change in the V(t) at a dose of 5.3 μg. The effect associated with infusion time was not significant (P = 0.113). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in vivo, and histochemical staining for iron was used to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in tissue sections. The V(t) for both methods was calculated by computer image analysis, and the correlation between magnetic resonance and histological volumes was determined (r2 = 0.93). On the basis of this model, we suggest that dose, rather than convection, might be the most important variable in maximizing the V(t) and improved distribution might be achieved by administering an increased concentration of agent.

AB - THE VOLUME OF distribution in tissue (V(t)) that can be achieved by direct interstitial infusion of therapeutic agents into brain is limited. The maintenance of a pressure gradient during interstitial infusion to establish fluid convection has been shown to increase the V(t) of small, medium, and large molecules. We have used monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds, superparamagnetic particles of sizes the same order of magnitude as virions, to investigate the effect of dose, the volume of infusate, and the time of infusion on the distribution of large molecules in rodent brain. Our initial study in rats (n = 6) replicated the results of a previously described report of convection-enhanced delivery in cats. At a constant rate and concentration, the V(t) increased in a linear fashion, proportional to the increases in time, volume, and dose. When using a constant rate and a constant concentration, however, it is unclear which variable or variables (dose, volume, infusion time) have the greatest influence on this effect. Therefore, we assessed each variable independently (n = 12). When the iron dose was increased from 5.3 to 26.5 μg, there was a three- to fivefold increase in the V(t), depending on the volume and time of infusion (2 μl/20 min, 24 μl/20 min, or 24 μl/120 min) (P <0.001). When the volume of infusate was increased from 2 to 24 μl, at an infusion time of 20 minutes and a dose of either 5.3 or 26.5 μg, there was a 43 or 52% decline in the V(t), respectively (P = 0.018). When the time for the infusion of 24 μl was increased from 20 to 120 minutes, there was a 79% increase in the V(t) at a dose of 26.5 μg but no change in the V(t) at a dose of 5.3 μg. The effect associated with infusion time was not significant (P = 0.113). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in vivo, and histochemical staining for iron was used to document the distribution of monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompounds in tissue sections. The V(t) for both methods was calculated by computer image analysis, and the correlation between magnetic resonance and histological volumes was determined (r2 = 0.93). On the basis of this model, we suggest that dose, rather than convection, might be the most important variable in maximizing the V(t) and improved distribution might be achieved by administering an increased concentration of agent.

KW - Convection

KW - Intracerebral infusion

KW - Magnetic resonance

KW - Monocrystalline iron oxide nanocompound

KW - Volume of distribution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029874655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029874655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8692395

AN - SCOPUS:0029874655

VL - 38

SP - 746

EP - 754

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 4

ER -