Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA: Are patients able to die in the setting of their choice?

Susan Lysaght Hurley, Caitlin Colling, Laura Bender, Pamela S. Harris, Joan K. Harrold, Joan Teno, Kevin A. Ache, David Casarett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Growth in hospice utilisation has been accompanied by an increase in the proportion of hospice patients who die in an inpatient hospice setting rather than at home. Objective To determine whether this increase in inpatient utilisation is consistent with patient preferences. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Seven hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organised to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness (CHOICE) network. Patients 70 488 patients admitted between 1 July 2008 and 31 May 2012. Measurements We measured changes in patients' stated preferences at the time of admission regarding site of death, including weights to adjust for non-response bias. We also assessed patients' actual site of death and concordance with patients' preferences. Results More patients died receiving inpatient care in 2012 as compared to 2008 (1920 (32.7%), 2537 (18.5%); OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.22; p<0.001). However, patients also expressed an increasing preference for dying in inpatient settings (weighted preferences 27.5% in 2012 vs 7.9% in 2008; p<0.001). The overall proportion of patients who died in the setting of their choice (weighted preferences) increased from 74% in 2008 to 78% in 2012 (p<0.001). Limitations This study included only seven hospices, and results may not be representative of the larger hospice population. Conclusions Although more patients are dying while receiving inpatient care, these changes in site of death seem to reflect changing patient preferences. The net effect is that patients in this sample were more likely to die in the setting of their choice in 2012 than they were in 2008.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-52
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospices
Patient Preference
Inpatients
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Oncology(nursing)
  • Medical–Surgical

Cite this

Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA : Are patients able to die in the setting of their choice? / Hurley, Susan Lysaght; Colling, Caitlin; Bender, Laura; Harris, Pamela S.; Harrold, Joan K.; Teno, Joan; Ache, Kevin A.; Casarett, David.

In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 46-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hurley, Susan Lysaght ; Colling, Caitlin ; Bender, Laura ; Harris, Pamela S. ; Harrold, Joan K. ; Teno, Joan ; Ache, Kevin A. ; Casarett, David. / Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA : Are patients able to die in the setting of their choice?. In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care. 2017 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 46-52.
@article{6eb50b1c080c4255bf9a71b309e3d833,
title = "Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA: Are patients able to die in the setting of their choice?",
abstract = "Background Growth in hospice utilisation has been accompanied by an increase in the proportion of hospice patients who die in an inpatient hospice setting rather than at home. Objective To determine whether this increase in inpatient utilisation is consistent with patient preferences. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Seven hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organised to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness (CHOICE) network. Patients 70 488 patients admitted between 1 July 2008 and 31 May 2012. Measurements We measured changes in patients' stated preferences at the time of admission regarding site of death, including weights to adjust for non-response bias. We also assessed patients' actual site of death and concordance with patients' preferences. Results More patients died receiving inpatient care in 2012 as compared to 2008 (1920 (32.7{\%}), 2537 (18.5{\%}); OR 1.21; 95{\%} CI 1.19 to 1.22; p<0.001). However, patients also expressed an increasing preference for dying in inpatient settings (weighted preferences 27.5{\%} in 2012 vs 7.9{\%} in 2008; p<0.001). The overall proportion of patients who died in the setting of their choice (weighted preferences) increased from 74{\%} in 2008 to 78{\%} in 2012 (p<0.001). Limitations This study included only seven hospices, and results may not be representative of the larger hospice population. Conclusions Although more patients are dying while receiving inpatient care, these changes in site of death seem to reflect changing patient preferences. The net effect is that patients in this sample were more likely to die in the setting of their choice in 2012 than they were in 2008.",
author = "Hurley, {Susan Lysaght} and Caitlin Colling and Laura Bender and Harris, {Pamela S.} and Harrold, {Joan K.} and Joan Teno and Ache, {Kevin A.} and David Casarett",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000599",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "46--52",
journal = "BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care",
issn = "2045-435X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing inpatient hospice use versus patient preferences in the USA

T2 - Are patients able to die in the setting of their choice?

AU - Hurley, Susan Lysaght

AU - Colling, Caitlin

AU - Bender, Laura

AU - Harris, Pamela S.

AU - Harrold, Joan K.

AU - Teno, Joan

AU - Ache, Kevin A.

AU - Casarett, David

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background Growth in hospice utilisation has been accompanied by an increase in the proportion of hospice patients who die in an inpatient hospice setting rather than at home. Objective To determine whether this increase in inpatient utilisation is consistent with patient preferences. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Seven hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organised to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness (CHOICE) network. Patients 70 488 patients admitted between 1 July 2008 and 31 May 2012. Measurements We measured changes in patients' stated preferences at the time of admission regarding site of death, including weights to adjust for non-response bias. We also assessed patients' actual site of death and concordance with patients' preferences. Results More patients died receiving inpatient care in 2012 as compared to 2008 (1920 (32.7%), 2537 (18.5%); OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.22; p<0.001). However, patients also expressed an increasing preference for dying in inpatient settings (weighted preferences 27.5% in 2012 vs 7.9% in 2008; p<0.001). The overall proportion of patients who died in the setting of their choice (weighted preferences) increased from 74% in 2008 to 78% in 2012 (p<0.001). Limitations This study included only seven hospices, and results may not be representative of the larger hospice population. Conclusions Although more patients are dying while receiving inpatient care, these changes in site of death seem to reflect changing patient preferences. The net effect is that patients in this sample were more likely to die in the setting of their choice in 2012 than they were in 2008.

AB - Background Growth in hospice utilisation has been accompanied by an increase in the proportion of hospice patients who die in an inpatient hospice setting rather than at home. Objective To determine whether this increase in inpatient utilisation is consistent with patient preferences. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Seven hospices in the Coalition of Hospices Organised to Investigate Comparative Effectiveness (CHOICE) network. Patients 70 488 patients admitted between 1 July 2008 and 31 May 2012. Measurements We measured changes in patients' stated preferences at the time of admission regarding site of death, including weights to adjust for non-response bias. We also assessed patients' actual site of death and concordance with patients' preferences. Results More patients died receiving inpatient care in 2012 as compared to 2008 (1920 (32.7%), 2537 (18.5%); OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.22; p<0.001). However, patients also expressed an increasing preference for dying in inpatient settings (weighted preferences 27.5% in 2012 vs 7.9% in 2008; p<0.001). The overall proportion of patients who died in the setting of their choice (weighted preferences) increased from 74% in 2008 to 78% in 2012 (p<0.001). Limitations This study included only seven hospices, and results may not be representative of the larger hospice population. Conclusions Although more patients are dying while receiving inpatient care, these changes in site of death seem to reflect changing patient preferences. The net effect is that patients in this sample were more likely to die in the setting of their choice in 2012 than they were in 2008.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014078493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014078493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000599

DO - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000599

M3 - Article

C2 - 25394918

AN - SCOPUS:85014078493

VL - 7

SP - 46

EP - 52

JO - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

JF - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

SN - 2045-435X

IS - 1

ER -