In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations

G. A. Munro, Thomas (Tom) Hilton, C. B. Hermesch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure the effect rebonding, with and without etching restoration margins, had on the microleakage of class 5 composite restorations. Eighty-two class 5 composite restorations were placed in extracted human molars with one margin on etched enamel and one below the cementoenamel junction. After finishing with disks, the teeth were divided into seven margin treatment groups: 1) restorations with no rebonding (control), 2) restoration margins rebonded with Universal Bond 3 primer, 3) restoration margins etched with 37% phosphoric acid and rebonded with Universal Bond 3 primer, 4) restoration margins rebonded with Universal Bond 3 adhesive, 5) restoration margins etched and rebonded with Universal Bond 3 adhesive, 6) restoration margins rebonded with Fortify, and 7) restoration margins etched and rebonded with Fortify. After storage in a chlorine-based disinfectant for 1 week, the restorations were thermocycled and then soaked in dye. After sectioning, microleakage was assessed by measuring the extent of dye penetration along the restoration-tooth interface. At the enamel margins there was no statistical difference in microleakage rebonded with or without etching. On the gingival margins there was a statistically significant reduction in microleakage for the nonetched Universal Bond 3 adhesive rebonded group compared to the nonrebonded control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-208
Number of pages6
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume21
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1996
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this