Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference: A prospective intervention study

Erica Mitchell, Dae Y. Lee, Sonal Arora, Pat Kenney-Moore, Timothy Liem, Gregory Landry, Gregory (Greg) Moneta, Nick Sevdalis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MCs) provide surgeons with an opportunity to confront medical errors, discuss adverse events, and learn from their mistakes. Yet, no standardized format for these conferences exists. The authors hypothesized that introducing a standardized presentation format using a validated framework would improve presentation quality and educational outcomes for all attendees. Method: Following a review of the literature and the solicitation of experts' opinions, the authors adapted a validated communication tool-the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations) framework. In 2010, they then introduced this novel standardized presentation format into the surgical M&MCs at the Oregon Health & Science University. The authors assessed three outcome measures-user satisfaction, presentation quality, and education outcomes-before and after implementation of their standardized presentation format. Results: Over the six-month study period, residents delivered 66 presentations to 197 faculty, resident, and medical student attendees. Attendees' performance on the multiple-choice questionnaires improved after the intervention, indicating an improvement in their knowledge. Presentation quality also improved significantly after the intervention, according to evaluations by trained faculty assessors. They noted specific improvements in the quality of the Background, Assessment, and Recommendation sections. Conclusions: The M&MC plays a pivotal role in educating residents and improving patient safety. Standardizing the M&MC presentation format using an adapted SBAR framework improved the quality of residents' presentations and attendees' educational outcomes. The authors recommend using such a standardized presentation format to enhance the educational value of M&MCs, with the goal of improving surgeons' knowledge, skills, and patient care practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)824-830
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume88
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

morbidity
mortality
Prospective Studies
Morbidity
Medical Errors
Mortality
resident
Expert Testimony
Patient Safety
Quality Improvement
Medical Students
Patient Care
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Education
Health
patient care
medical student
Surgeons
expert

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference : A prospective intervention study. / Mitchell, Erica; Lee, Dae Y.; Arora, Sonal; Kenney-Moore, Pat; Liem, Timothy; Landry, Gregory; Moneta, Gregory (Greg); Sevdalis, Nick.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 88, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 824-830.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitchell, Erica ; Lee, Dae Y. ; Arora, Sonal ; Kenney-Moore, Pat ; Liem, Timothy ; Landry, Gregory ; Moneta, Gregory (Greg) ; Sevdalis, Nick. / Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference : A prospective intervention study. In: Academic Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 88, No. 6. pp. 824-830.
@article{12fb35f8f0794d42bb69a7ecfa2528ce,
title = "Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference: A prospective intervention study",
abstract = "Purpose: Surgical morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MCs) provide surgeons with an opportunity to confront medical errors, discuss adverse events, and learn from their mistakes. Yet, no standardized format for these conferences exists. The authors hypothesized that introducing a standardized presentation format using a validated framework would improve presentation quality and educational outcomes for all attendees. Method: Following a review of the literature and the solicitation of experts' opinions, the authors adapted a validated communication tool-the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations) framework. In 2010, they then introduced this novel standardized presentation format into the surgical M&MCs at the Oregon Health & Science University. The authors assessed three outcome measures-user satisfaction, presentation quality, and education outcomes-before and after implementation of their standardized presentation format. Results: Over the six-month study period, residents delivered 66 presentations to 197 faculty, resident, and medical student attendees. Attendees' performance on the multiple-choice questionnaires improved after the intervention, indicating an improvement in their knowledge. Presentation quality also improved significantly after the intervention, according to evaluations by trained faculty assessors. They noted specific improvements in the quality of the Background, Assessment, and Recommendation sections. Conclusions: The M&MC plays a pivotal role in educating residents and improving patient safety. Standardizing the M&MC presentation format using an adapted SBAR framework improved the quality of residents' presentations and attendees' educational outcomes. The authors recommend using such a standardized presentation format to enhance the educational value of M&MCs, with the goal of improving surgeons' knowledge, skills, and patient care practices.",
author = "Erica Mitchell and Lee, {Dae Y.} and Sonal Arora and Pat Kenney-Moore and Timothy Liem and Gregory Landry and Moneta, {Gregory (Greg)} and Nick Sevdalis",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828f87fe",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "824--830",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the quality of the surgical morbidity and mortality conference

T2 - A prospective intervention study

AU - Mitchell, Erica

AU - Lee, Dae Y.

AU - Arora, Sonal

AU - Kenney-Moore, Pat

AU - Liem, Timothy

AU - Landry, Gregory

AU - Moneta, Gregory (Greg)

AU - Sevdalis, Nick

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Purpose: Surgical morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MCs) provide surgeons with an opportunity to confront medical errors, discuss adverse events, and learn from their mistakes. Yet, no standardized format for these conferences exists. The authors hypothesized that introducing a standardized presentation format using a validated framework would improve presentation quality and educational outcomes for all attendees. Method: Following a review of the literature and the solicitation of experts' opinions, the authors adapted a validated communication tool-the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations) framework. In 2010, they then introduced this novel standardized presentation format into the surgical M&MCs at the Oregon Health & Science University. The authors assessed three outcome measures-user satisfaction, presentation quality, and education outcomes-before and after implementation of their standardized presentation format. Results: Over the six-month study period, residents delivered 66 presentations to 197 faculty, resident, and medical student attendees. Attendees' performance on the multiple-choice questionnaires improved after the intervention, indicating an improvement in their knowledge. Presentation quality also improved significantly after the intervention, according to evaluations by trained faculty assessors. They noted specific improvements in the quality of the Background, Assessment, and Recommendation sections. Conclusions: The M&MC plays a pivotal role in educating residents and improving patient safety. Standardizing the M&MC presentation format using an adapted SBAR framework improved the quality of residents' presentations and attendees' educational outcomes. The authors recommend using such a standardized presentation format to enhance the educational value of M&MCs, with the goal of improving surgeons' knowledge, skills, and patient care practices.

AB - Purpose: Surgical morbidity and mortality conferences (M&MCs) provide surgeons with an opportunity to confront medical errors, discuss adverse events, and learn from their mistakes. Yet, no standardized format for these conferences exists. The authors hypothesized that introducing a standardized presentation format using a validated framework would improve presentation quality and educational outcomes for all attendees. Method: Following a review of the literature and the solicitation of experts' opinions, the authors adapted a validated communication tool-the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations) framework. In 2010, they then introduced this novel standardized presentation format into the surgical M&MCs at the Oregon Health & Science University. The authors assessed three outcome measures-user satisfaction, presentation quality, and education outcomes-before and after implementation of their standardized presentation format. Results: Over the six-month study period, residents delivered 66 presentations to 197 faculty, resident, and medical student attendees. Attendees' performance on the multiple-choice questionnaires improved after the intervention, indicating an improvement in their knowledge. Presentation quality also improved significantly after the intervention, according to evaluations by trained faculty assessors. They noted specific improvements in the quality of the Background, Assessment, and Recommendation sections. Conclusions: The M&MC plays a pivotal role in educating residents and improving patient safety. Standardizing the M&MC presentation format using an adapted SBAR framework improved the quality of residents' presentations and attendees' educational outcomes. The authors recommend using such a standardized presentation format to enhance the educational value of M&MCs, with the goal of improving surgeons' knowledge, skills, and patient care practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878924067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878924067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828f87fe

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828f87fe

M3 - Article

C2 - 23619062

AN - SCOPUS:84878924067

VL - 88

SP - 824

EP - 830

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 6

ER -