Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools: Common practices, barriers and facilitators

NIH R25 Social and Behavioral Science Consortium Interprofessional Education Workgroup

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Enhanced patient outcomes and accreditation criteria have led schools to integrate interprofessional education (IPE). While several studies describe IPE curricula at individual institutions, few examine practices across multiple institutions. Purpose: To examine the IPE integration at different institutions and determine gaps where there is potential for improvement. Method: In this mixed methods study, we obtained survey results from 16 U.S. medical schools, 14 of which reported IPE activities. Results: The most common collaboration was between medical and nursing schools (93%). The prevalent format was shared curriculum, often including integrated modules (57%). Small group activities represented the majority (64%) of event settings, and simulation-based learning, games and role-play (71%) were the most utilized learning methods. Thirteen schools (81.3%) reported teaching IPE competencies, but significant variation existed. Gaps and barriers in the study include limitations of using a convenience sample, limited qualitative analysis, and survey by self-report. Conclusions: Most IPE activities focused on the physician role. Implementation challenges included scheduling, logistics and financial support. A need for effective faculty development as well as measures to examine the link between IPE learning outcomes and patient outcomes were identified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-49
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Interprofessional Education and Practice
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

school
education
education curriculum
learning method
role play
accreditation
small group
learning
scheduling
nursing
logistics
physician
curriculum
simulation
event
Teaching

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Interprofessional education
  • Interprofessional learning
  • Mixed methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools : Common practices, barriers and facilitators. / NIH R25 Social and Behavioral Science Consortium Interprofessional Education Workgroup.

In: Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, Vol. 4, 01.09.2016, p. 41-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

NIH R25 Social and Behavioral Science Consortium Interprofessional Education Workgroup. / Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools : Common practices, barriers and facilitators. In: Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice. 2016 ; Vol. 4. pp. 41-49.
@article{4baefbe6458b4c8f8b709258a6de126b,
title = "Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools: Common practices, barriers and facilitators",
abstract = "Background: Enhanced patient outcomes and accreditation criteria have led schools to integrate interprofessional education (IPE). While several studies describe IPE curricula at individual institutions, few examine practices across multiple institutions. Purpose: To examine the IPE integration at different institutions and determine gaps where there is potential for improvement. Method: In this mixed methods study, we obtained survey results from 16 U.S. medical schools, 14 of which reported IPE activities. Results: The most common collaboration was between medical and nursing schools (93{\%}). The prevalent format was shared curriculum, often including integrated modules (57{\%}). Small group activities represented the majority (64{\%}) of event settings, and simulation-based learning, games and role-play (71{\%}) were the most utilized learning methods. Thirteen schools (81.3{\%}) reported teaching IPE competencies, but significant variation existed. Gaps and barriers in the study include limitations of using a convenience sample, limited qualitative analysis, and survey by self-report. Conclusions: Most IPE activities focused on the physician role. Implementation challenges included scheduling, logistics and financial support. A need for effective faculty development as well as measures to examine the link between IPE learning outcomes and patient outcomes were identified.",
keywords = "Collaboration, Interprofessional education, Interprofessional learning, Mixed methods",
author = "{NIH R25 Social and Behavioral Science Consortium Interprofessional Education Workgroup} and Courtney West and Lori Graham and Palmer, {Ryan T.} and Miller, {Marissa Fuqua} and Thayer, {Erin K.} and Stuber, {Margaret L.} and Linda Awdishu and Umoren, {Rachel A.} and Wamsley, {Maria A.} and Nelson, {Elizabeth A.} and Joo, {Pablo A.} and Tysinger, {James W.} and Paul George and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)} and Karen Garman and Richard Dollase and Rita Charon and Stephanie Harmon",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.xjep.2016.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "41--49",
journal = "Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice",
issn = "2405-4526",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of interprofessional education (IPE) in 16 U.S. medical schools

T2 - Common practices, barriers and facilitators

AU - NIH R25 Social and Behavioral Science Consortium Interprofessional Education Workgroup

AU - West, Courtney

AU - Graham, Lori

AU - Palmer, Ryan T.

AU - Miller, Marissa Fuqua

AU - Thayer, Erin K.

AU - Stuber, Margaret L.

AU - Awdishu, Linda

AU - Umoren, Rachel A.

AU - Wamsley, Maria A.

AU - Nelson, Elizabeth A.

AU - Joo, Pablo A.

AU - Tysinger, James W.

AU - George, Paul

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

AU - Garman, Karen

AU - Dollase, Richard

AU - Charon, Rita

AU - Harmon, Stephanie

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background: Enhanced patient outcomes and accreditation criteria have led schools to integrate interprofessional education (IPE). While several studies describe IPE curricula at individual institutions, few examine practices across multiple institutions. Purpose: To examine the IPE integration at different institutions and determine gaps where there is potential for improvement. Method: In this mixed methods study, we obtained survey results from 16 U.S. medical schools, 14 of which reported IPE activities. Results: The most common collaboration was between medical and nursing schools (93%). The prevalent format was shared curriculum, often including integrated modules (57%). Small group activities represented the majority (64%) of event settings, and simulation-based learning, games and role-play (71%) were the most utilized learning methods. Thirteen schools (81.3%) reported teaching IPE competencies, but significant variation existed. Gaps and barriers in the study include limitations of using a convenience sample, limited qualitative analysis, and survey by self-report. Conclusions: Most IPE activities focused on the physician role. Implementation challenges included scheduling, logistics and financial support. A need for effective faculty development as well as measures to examine the link between IPE learning outcomes and patient outcomes were identified.

AB - Background: Enhanced patient outcomes and accreditation criteria have led schools to integrate interprofessional education (IPE). While several studies describe IPE curricula at individual institutions, few examine practices across multiple institutions. Purpose: To examine the IPE integration at different institutions and determine gaps where there is potential for improvement. Method: In this mixed methods study, we obtained survey results from 16 U.S. medical schools, 14 of which reported IPE activities. Results: The most common collaboration was between medical and nursing schools (93%). The prevalent format was shared curriculum, often including integrated modules (57%). Small group activities represented the majority (64%) of event settings, and simulation-based learning, games and role-play (71%) were the most utilized learning methods. Thirteen schools (81.3%) reported teaching IPE competencies, but significant variation existed. Gaps and barriers in the study include limitations of using a convenience sample, limited qualitative analysis, and survey by self-report. Conclusions: Most IPE activities focused on the physician role. Implementation challenges included scheduling, logistics and financial support. A need for effective faculty development as well as measures to examine the link between IPE learning outcomes and patient outcomes were identified.

KW - Collaboration

KW - Interprofessional education

KW - Interprofessional learning

KW - Mixed methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978923005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978923005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.xjep.2016.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.xjep.2016.05.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84978923005

VL - 4

SP - 41

EP - 49

JO - Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice

JF - Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice

SN - 2405-4526

ER -