Implementation of evidence-based practices for treatment of alcohol and drug disorders: The role of the state authority

Traci Rieckmann, Anne E. Kovas, Holly E. Fussell, Nicole M. Stettler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current climate of increasing performance expectations and diminishing resources, along with innovations in evidence-based practices (EBPs), creates new dilemmas for substance abuse treatment providers, policymakers, funders, and the service delivery system. This paper describes findings from baseline interviews with representatives from 49 state substance abuse authorities (SSAs). Interviews assessed efforts aimed at facilitating EBP adoption in each state and the District of Columbia. Results suggested that SSAs are concentrating more effort on EBP implementation strategies such as education, training, and infrastructure development, and less effort on financial mechanisms, regulations, and accreditation. The majority of SSAs use EBPs as a criterion in their contracts with providers, and just over half reported that EBP use is tied to state funding. To date, Oregon remains the only state with legislation that mandates treatment expenditures for EBPs; North Carolina follows suit with legislation that requires EBP promotion within current resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-419
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

state authority
Evidence-Based Practice
alcohol
Alcohols
drug
substance abuse
Substance-Related Disorders
Pharmaceutical Preparations
evidence
Legislation
legislation
Interviews
infrastructure development
Accreditation
Contracts
Health Expenditures
interview
Climate
accreditation
resources

Keywords

  • Evidence-based practices
  • Implementation
  • State policy
  • Substance abuse treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Implementation of evidence-based practices for treatment of alcohol and drug disorders : The role of the state authority. / Rieckmann, Traci; Kovas, Anne E.; Fussell, Holly E.; Stettler, Nicole M.

In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, 10.2009, p. 407-419.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rieckmann, Traci ; Kovas, Anne E. ; Fussell, Holly E. ; Stettler, Nicole M. / Implementation of evidence-based practices for treatment of alcohol and drug disorders : The role of the state authority. In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 407-419.
@article{5a36e2279f19449a8f7596f7c7fd9741,
title = "Implementation of evidence-based practices for treatment of alcohol and drug disorders: The role of the state authority",
abstract = "The current climate of increasing performance expectations and diminishing resources, along with innovations in evidence-based practices (EBPs), creates new dilemmas for substance abuse treatment providers, policymakers, funders, and the service delivery system. This paper describes findings from baseline interviews with representatives from 49 state substance abuse authorities (SSAs). Interviews assessed efforts aimed at facilitating EBP adoption in each state and the District of Columbia. Results suggested that SSAs are concentrating more effort on EBP implementation strategies such as education, training, and infrastructure development, and less effort on financial mechanisms, regulations, and accreditation. The majority of SSAs use EBPs as a criterion in their contracts with providers, and just over half reported that EBP use is tied to state funding. To date, Oregon remains the only state with legislation that mandates treatment expenditures for EBPs; North Carolina follows suit with legislation that requires EBP promotion within current resources.",
keywords = "Evidence-based practices, Implementation, State policy, Substance abuse treatment",
author = "Traci Rieckmann and Kovas, {Anne E.} and Fussell, {Holly E.} and Stettler, {Nicole M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s11414-008-9122-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "407--419",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research",
issn = "1094-3412",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of evidence-based practices for treatment of alcohol and drug disorders

T2 - The role of the state authority

AU - Rieckmann, Traci

AU - Kovas, Anne E.

AU - Fussell, Holly E.

AU - Stettler, Nicole M.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - The current climate of increasing performance expectations and diminishing resources, along with innovations in evidence-based practices (EBPs), creates new dilemmas for substance abuse treatment providers, policymakers, funders, and the service delivery system. This paper describes findings from baseline interviews with representatives from 49 state substance abuse authorities (SSAs). Interviews assessed efforts aimed at facilitating EBP adoption in each state and the District of Columbia. Results suggested that SSAs are concentrating more effort on EBP implementation strategies such as education, training, and infrastructure development, and less effort on financial mechanisms, regulations, and accreditation. The majority of SSAs use EBPs as a criterion in their contracts with providers, and just over half reported that EBP use is tied to state funding. To date, Oregon remains the only state with legislation that mandates treatment expenditures for EBPs; North Carolina follows suit with legislation that requires EBP promotion within current resources.

AB - The current climate of increasing performance expectations and diminishing resources, along with innovations in evidence-based practices (EBPs), creates new dilemmas for substance abuse treatment providers, policymakers, funders, and the service delivery system. This paper describes findings from baseline interviews with representatives from 49 state substance abuse authorities (SSAs). Interviews assessed efforts aimed at facilitating EBP adoption in each state and the District of Columbia. Results suggested that SSAs are concentrating more effort on EBP implementation strategies such as education, training, and infrastructure development, and less effort on financial mechanisms, regulations, and accreditation. The majority of SSAs use EBPs as a criterion in their contracts with providers, and just over half reported that EBP use is tied to state funding. To date, Oregon remains the only state with legislation that mandates treatment expenditures for EBPs; North Carolina follows suit with legislation that requires EBP promotion within current resources.

KW - Evidence-based practices

KW - Implementation

KW - State policy

KW - Substance abuse treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949174872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69949174872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11414-008-9122-6

DO - 10.1007/s11414-008-9122-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 18543111

AN - SCOPUS:69949174872

VL - 36

SP - 407

EP - 419

JO - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

JF - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

SN - 1094-3412

IS - 4

ER -