Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs

M. R. Scheltinga, W. S. Helton, J. Rounds, Danny Jacobs, D. W. Wilmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Body resistance and reactance to the conduction of an alternating electrical current were measured using electrodes attached to distal and proximal portions of limbs in anesthetized dogs. Body impedance was calculated from these measurements obtained at 30-min time intervals during a control period and after intravenous administration of 0.9% saline. Extracellular (ECW) and total body water (TBW) were determined by bromide and heavy water dilution techniques, respectively. Baseline impedance obtained from proximal electrodes was related to ECW (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) and TBW (r = 0.80, P < 0.02). After saline infusion, proximal electrodes detected a significant fall in impedance (P < 0.001), whereas distal electrodes did not (P = 0.06). Furthermore, ECW and TBW could be estimated from the drop of proximal impedance after this bolus infusion (r = 0.82, P < 0.02, and r = 0.86, P < 0.01, respectively), but not from distal impedance measurements. Proximally placed impedance electrodes are superior to traditionally used distal electrodes for assessment of body fluid changes in the dog.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2039-2044
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume70
Issue number5
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electric Impedance
Electrodes
Extremities
Dogs
Body Water
Deuterium Oxide
Indicator Dilution Techniques
Body Fluids
Bromides
Intravenous Administration

Keywords

  • bioelectrical impedance analysis
  • body composition
  • physiological monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Scheltinga, M. R., Helton, W. S., Rounds, J., Jacobs, D., & Wilmore, D. W. (1991). Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs. Journal of Applied Physiology, 70(5), 2039-2044.

Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs. / Scheltinga, M. R.; Helton, W. S.; Rounds, J.; Jacobs, Danny; Wilmore, D. W.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 70, No. 5, 01.01.1991, p. 2039-2044.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scheltinga, MR, Helton, WS, Rounds, J, Jacobs, D & Wilmore, DW 1991, 'Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs', Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 2039-2044.
Scheltinga, M. R. ; Helton, W. S. ; Rounds, J. ; Jacobs, Danny ; Wilmore, D. W. / Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 1991 ; Vol. 70, No. 5. pp. 2039-2044.
@article{76f9778605e74d0a999a990cc7db7ab2,
title = "Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs",
abstract = "Body resistance and reactance to the conduction of an alternating electrical current were measured using electrodes attached to distal and proximal portions of limbs in anesthetized dogs. Body impedance was calculated from these measurements obtained at 30-min time intervals during a control period and after intravenous administration of 0.9{\%} saline. Extracellular (ECW) and total body water (TBW) were determined by bromide and heavy water dilution techniques, respectively. Baseline impedance obtained from proximal electrodes was related to ECW (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) and TBW (r = 0.80, P < 0.02). After saline infusion, proximal electrodes detected a significant fall in impedance (P < 0.001), whereas distal electrodes did not (P = 0.06). Furthermore, ECW and TBW could be estimated from the drop of proximal impedance after this bolus infusion (r = 0.82, P < 0.02, and r = 0.86, P < 0.01, respectively), but not from distal impedance measurements. Proximally placed impedance electrodes are superior to traditionally used distal electrodes for assessment of body fluid changes in the dog.",
keywords = "bioelectrical impedance analysis, body composition, physiological monitoring",
author = "Scheltinga, {M. R.} and Helton, {W. S.} and J. Rounds and Danny Jacobs and Wilmore, {D. W.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "2039--2044",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impedance electrodes positioned on proximal portions of limbs quantify fluid compartments in dogs

AU - Scheltinga, M. R.

AU - Helton, W. S.

AU - Rounds, J.

AU - Jacobs, Danny

AU - Wilmore, D. W.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - Body resistance and reactance to the conduction of an alternating electrical current were measured using electrodes attached to distal and proximal portions of limbs in anesthetized dogs. Body impedance was calculated from these measurements obtained at 30-min time intervals during a control period and after intravenous administration of 0.9% saline. Extracellular (ECW) and total body water (TBW) were determined by bromide and heavy water dilution techniques, respectively. Baseline impedance obtained from proximal electrodes was related to ECW (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) and TBW (r = 0.80, P < 0.02). After saline infusion, proximal electrodes detected a significant fall in impedance (P < 0.001), whereas distal electrodes did not (P = 0.06). Furthermore, ECW and TBW could be estimated from the drop of proximal impedance after this bolus infusion (r = 0.82, P < 0.02, and r = 0.86, P < 0.01, respectively), but not from distal impedance measurements. Proximally placed impedance electrodes are superior to traditionally used distal electrodes for assessment of body fluid changes in the dog.

AB - Body resistance and reactance to the conduction of an alternating electrical current were measured using electrodes attached to distal and proximal portions of limbs in anesthetized dogs. Body impedance was calculated from these measurements obtained at 30-min time intervals during a control period and after intravenous administration of 0.9% saline. Extracellular (ECW) and total body water (TBW) were determined by bromide and heavy water dilution techniques, respectively. Baseline impedance obtained from proximal electrodes was related to ECW (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) and TBW (r = 0.80, P < 0.02). After saline infusion, proximal electrodes detected a significant fall in impedance (P < 0.001), whereas distal electrodes did not (P = 0.06). Furthermore, ECW and TBW could be estimated from the drop of proximal impedance after this bolus infusion (r = 0.82, P < 0.02, and r = 0.86, P < 0.01, respectively), but not from distal impedance measurements. Proximally placed impedance electrodes are superior to traditionally used distal electrodes for assessment of body fluid changes in the dog.

KW - bioelectrical impedance analysis

KW - body composition

KW - physiological monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025736136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025736136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1864785

AN - SCOPUS:0025736136

VL - 70

SP - 2039

EP - 2044

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 5

ER -