Impact on Pregnancy of Gross and Microscopic Vasal Fluid during Vasectomy Reversal

Kevin A. Ostrowski, A. Scott Polackwich, Michael Conlin, Jason Hedges, Eugene Fuchs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared fertility outcomes with gross and microscopic fluid findings at vasectomy reversal at a high volume vasectomy reversal center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective database was performed. All vasectomy reversals were performed by a single surgeon (EFF) between 1978 and 2011. The clinical pregnancy rate was self-reported or determined via patient mailers. Patient and operative findings were determined through database review. We classified vasal fluid as opalescent, creamy, pasty or clear. Intraoperative light microscopy was used to determine if sperm or sperm parts were present and if they were motile. Multivariate analysis was performed evaluating patient age, partner age, years after vasectomy, type of surgery, and gross and microscopic fluid analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 2,947 microsurgical vasectomy reversals were reviewed after we excluded reversals performed for post-vasectomy pain. We determined the pregnancy status of 902 (31%) cases. On univariate analysis with respect to pregnancy the presence of motile sperm at vasovasostomy neared statistical significance (p=0.075) and there was no difference between bilateral vs unilateral motile sperm. Gross fluid appearance was not statistically significant but we found the order of pregnancy success to be opalescent, creamy, clear then pasty fluid. On multivariate analysis only female partner age and sperm heads only or no sperm seen on light microscopy had statistical significance (p

CONCLUSIONS: The presence of motile sperm at vasectomy reversal approaches statistical significance on univariate analysis as a factor that affects clinical pregnancy rates. On multivariate analysis female partner age and microscopic findings of sperm heads only or no sperm are inversely related to pregnancy rates. These data will help counsel couples after vasectomy reversal and reinforce the importance of female partner age.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)156-159
Number of pages4
JournalThe Journal of Urology
Volume194
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

Vasovasostomy
Spermatozoa
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Sperm Head
Vasectomy
Multivariate Analysis
Microscopy
Databases
Light
Fertility
Retrospective Studies
Pain

Keywords

  • infertility
  • pregnancy
  • vasovasostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Impact on Pregnancy of Gross and Microscopic Vasal Fluid during Vasectomy Reversal. / Ostrowski, Kevin A.; Polackwich, A. Scott; Conlin, Michael; Hedges, Jason; Fuchs, Eugene.

In: The Journal of Urology, Vol. 194, No. 1, 01.07.2015, p. 156-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3356c62f4d004e549dbda8fdbb524459,
title = "Impact on Pregnancy of Gross and Microscopic Vasal Fluid during Vasectomy Reversal",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We compared fertility outcomes with gross and microscopic fluid findings at vasectomy reversal at a high volume vasectomy reversal center.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective database was performed. All vasectomy reversals were performed by a single surgeon (EFF) between 1978 and 2011. The clinical pregnancy rate was self-reported or determined via patient mailers. Patient and operative findings were determined through database review. We classified vasal fluid as opalescent, creamy, pasty or clear. Intraoperative light microscopy was used to determine if sperm or sperm parts were present and if they were motile. Multivariate analysis was performed evaluating patient age, partner age, years after vasectomy, type of surgery, and gross and microscopic fluid analysis.RESULTS: A total of 2,947 microsurgical vasectomy reversals were reviewed after we excluded reversals performed for post-vasectomy pain. We determined the pregnancy status of 902 (31{\%}) cases. On univariate analysis with respect to pregnancy the presence of motile sperm at vasovasostomy neared statistical significance (p=0.075) and there was no difference between bilateral vs unilateral motile sperm. Gross fluid appearance was not statistically significant but we found the order of pregnancy success to be opalescent, creamy, clear then pasty fluid. On multivariate analysis only female partner age and sperm heads only or no sperm seen on light microscopy had statistical significance (p CONCLUSIONS: The presence of motile sperm at vasectomy reversal approaches statistical significance on univariate analysis as a factor that affects clinical pregnancy rates. On multivariate analysis female partner age and microscopic findings of sperm heads only or no sperm are inversely related to pregnancy rates. These data will help counsel couples after vasectomy reversal and reinforce the importance of female partner age.",
keywords = "infertility, pregnancy, vasovasostomy",
author = "Ostrowski, {Kevin A.} and Polackwich, {A. Scott} and Michael Conlin and Jason Hedges and Eugene Fuchs",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "194",
pages = "156--159",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact on Pregnancy of Gross and Microscopic Vasal Fluid during Vasectomy Reversal

AU - Ostrowski, Kevin A.

AU - Polackwich, A. Scott

AU - Conlin, Michael

AU - Hedges, Jason

AU - Fuchs, Eugene

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - PURPOSE: We compared fertility outcomes with gross and microscopic fluid findings at vasectomy reversal at a high volume vasectomy reversal center.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective database was performed. All vasectomy reversals were performed by a single surgeon (EFF) between 1978 and 2011. The clinical pregnancy rate was self-reported or determined via patient mailers. Patient and operative findings were determined through database review. We classified vasal fluid as opalescent, creamy, pasty or clear. Intraoperative light microscopy was used to determine if sperm or sperm parts were present and if they were motile. Multivariate analysis was performed evaluating patient age, partner age, years after vasectomy, type of surgery, and gross and microscopic fluid analysis.RESULTS: A total of 2,947 microsurgical vasectomy reversals were reviewed after we excluded reversals performed for post-vasectomy pain. We determined the pregnancy status of 902 (31%) cases. On univariate analysis with respect to pregnancy the presence of motile sperm at vasovasostomy neared statistical significance (p=0.075) and there was no difference between bilateral vs unilateral motile sperm. Gross fluid appearance was not statistically significant but we found the order of pregnancy success to be opalescent, creamy, clear then pasty fluid. On multivariate analysis only female partner age and sperm heads only or no sperm seen on light microscopy had statistical significance (p CONCLUSIONS: The presence of motile sperm at vasectomy reversal approaches statistical significance on univariate analysis as a factor that affects clinical pregnancy rates. On multivariate analysis female partner age and microscopic findings of sperm heads only or no sperm are inversely related to pregnancy rates. These data will help counsel couples after vasectomy reversal and reinforce the importance of female partner age.

AB - PURPOSE: We compared fertility outcomes with gross and microscopic fluid findings at vasectomy reversal at a high volume vasectomy reversal center.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective database was performed. All vasectomy reversals were performed by a single surgeon (EFF) between 1978 and 2011. The clinical pregnancy rate was self-reported or determined via patient mailers. Patient and operative findings were determined through database review. We classified vasal fluid as opalescent, creamy, pasty or clear. Intraoperative light microscopy was used to determine if sperm or sperm parts were present and if they were motile. Multivariate analysis was performed evaluating patient age, partner age, years after vasectomy, type of surgery, and gross and microscopic fluid analysis.RESULTS: A total of 2,947 microsurgical vasectomy reversals were reviewed after we excluded reversals performed for post-vasectomy pain. We determined the pregnancy status of 902 (31%) cases. On univariate analysis with respect to pregnancy the presence of motile sperm at vasovasostomy neared statistical significance (p=0.075) and there was no difference between bilateral vs unilateral motile sperm. Gross fluid appearance was not statistically significant but we found the order of pregnancy success to be opalescent, creamy, clear then pasty fluid. On multivariate analysis only female partner age and sperm heads only or no sperm seen on light microscopy had statistical significance (p CONCLUSIONS: The presence of motile sperm at vasectomy reversal approaches statistical significance on univariate analysis as a factor that affects clinical pregnancy rates. On multivariate analysis female partner age and microscopic findings of sperm heads only or no sperm are inversely related to pregnancy rates. These data will help counsel couples after vasectomy reversal and reinforce the importance of female partner age.

KW - infertility

KW - pregnancy

KW - vasovasostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940653279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940653279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 25595861

AN - SCOPUS:84940653279

VL - 194

SP - 156

EP - 159

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 1

ER -