TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of tumour morphology on renal function decline after partial nephrectomy
AU - Mehrazin, Reza
AU - Palazzi, Kerrin L.
AU - Kopp, Ryan P.
AU - Colangelo, Caroline J.
AU - Stroup, Sean P.
AU - Masterson, James H.
AU - Liss, Michael A.
AU - Cohen, Seth A.
AU - Jabaji, Ramzi
AU - Park, Samuel K.
AU - Patterson, Anthony L.
AU - L'Esperance, James O.
AU - Derweesh, Ithaar H.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Objective To examine the association of renal morphology with renal function after partial nephrectomy (PN). Patients and Methods We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 322 PNs performed between 2003 and 2011. The RENAL nephrometry score for each lesion was determined and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and at last follow-up. We divided patients into two RENAL nephrometry score groups, low (<8) and high (≥8), and analysed and compared the outcomes of each group. The primary outcome was median change in eGFR between preoperative and last follow-up (ΔeGFR). The secondary outcome was eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 at last follow-up. Multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at last follow-up. Results The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 25.2 (13.5-39.3) months. Low (n = 165) and high (n = 157) RENAL score groups were well-matched for baseline eGFR. The median tumour size (4.2 vs 2.4 cm, P < 0.001) was greater for the high group. In all, 64% of the low and 88.2% of the high RENAL score group (P < 0.001) had decreased eGFR at last follow-up. Median eGFR was -7 for the low vs -13.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the high group (P = 0.001); eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at last follow-up was 27.3% for the low vs 37.6% for the high group (P = 0.057). Linear regression analysis showed that for each 1-point increase in RENAL score, there was 2.5% decrease in eGFR (P = 0.002); for each 1-cm increase in tumour size, there was 1.8% decrease in eGFR (P = 0.013). Area under curve analyses showed no significant difference between RENAL score and tumour size for prediction of de novoâ€...eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.920) and ΔeGFR ≥50% (P = 0.85). Multivariable analysis showed that increasing RENAL score (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, P = 0.046) and decreasing preoperative eGFR (OR 1.10, P < 0.001) were risk factors for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at last follow-up. Conclusions Increasing RENAL nephrometry score is an independent risk factor for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 after PN. RENAL nephrometry score may serve as an additional measure for risk stratification before PN, but further investigation is required.
AB - Objective To examine the association of renal morphology with renal function after partial nephrectomy (PN). Patients and Methods We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 322 PNs performed between 2003 and 2011. The RENAL nephrometry score for each lesion was determined and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated preoperatively and at last follow-up. We divided patients into two RENAL nephrometry score groups, low (<8) and high (≥8), and analysed and compared the outcomes of each group. The primary outcome was median change in eGFR between preoperative and last follow-up (ΔeGFR). The secondary outcome was eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 at last follow-up. Multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at last follow-up. Results The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 25.2 (13.5-39.3) months. Low (n = 165) and high (n = 157) RENAL score groups were well-matched for baseline eGFR. The median tumour size (4.2 vs 2.4 cm, P < 0.001) was greater for the high group. In all, 64% of the low and 88.2% of the high RENAL score group (P < 0.001) had decreased eGFR at last follow-up. Median eGFR was -7 for the low vs -13.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the high group (P = 0.001); eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at last follow-up was 27.3% for the low vs 37.6% for the high group (P = 0.057). Linear regression analysis showed that for each 1-point increase in RENAL score, there was 2.5% decrease in eGFR (P = 0.002); for each 1-cm increase in tumour size, there was 1.8% decrease in eGFR (P = 0.013). Area under curve analyses showed no significant difference between RENAL score and tumour size for prediction of de novoâ€...eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.920) and ΔeGFR ≥50% (P = 0.85). Multivariable analysis showed that increasing RENAL score (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, P = 0.046) and decreasing preoperative eGFR (OR 1.10, P < 0.001) were risk factors for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 at last follow-up. Conclusions Increasing RENAL nephrometry score is an independent risk factor for eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 after PN. RENAL nephrometry score may serve as an additional measure for risk stratification before PN, but further investigation is required.
KW - RENAL nephrometry score
KW - chronic kidney disease
KW - chronic renal insufficiency
KW - glomerular filtration rate
KW - nephron-sparing surgery
KW - partial nephrectomy
KW - renal cell carcinoma
KW - renal function
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878337280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878337280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bju.12149
DO - 10.1111/bju.12149
M3 - Article
C2 - 23714649
AN - SCOPUS:84878337280
SN - 1464-4096
VL - 111
SP - E374-E382
JO - British Journal of Urology
JF - British Journal of Urology
IS - 8
ER -