Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation

Jerris R. Hedges, N. Clay Mann, Richard Mullins, Donna Rowland, William Worrall, Andrew D. Zechnich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association of rural ED patient assessment documentation with state trauma system implementation, hospital trauma categorization level (i.e., Level-3 vs Level-4), injury diagnosis, and patient demographics. Methods: A pre- vs post-system implementation (historical control) analysis of trauma documentation was performed using a sample of rural ED trauma patients from 4 Level-3 and 5 Level-4 trauma hospitals. The medical records of patients with specific index diagnoses in 4 anatomic regions (head, chest, liver/spleen, and femur/open-tibia) were reviewed for 3-year periods before statewide trauma system implementation and after hospital categorization. Vital sign, % inspired O 2, and O 2 saturation determinations were identified relative to the first and the last vital signs documented on the ED record. If not documented in the medical chart within 5 minutes of the first or last ED vital sign assessment, these measurements were considered missing. Separately, neurologic documentation (initial and final) also was sought for patients meeting criteria for an index head injury. Results: Of 1,057 patients entered into the database, 532 were evaluated during the pre-system period and 525 were evaluated during the post-system period. Overall, 47% had a head injury, 34% had a chest injury, 23% had a femur/open-tibia injury, and 12% had a spleen/liver injury. There were 142 (13%) patients with an injury in >1 index area. Except for initial systolic blood pressure, documentation of all other initial and final patient vital signs increased significantly (p <0.05). Documentation of the Glasgow Coma Scale score (initial and final; p = 0.0001) and a final pupil examination on head-injured patients (p = 0.025) also increased. The effects of hospital level, injury diagnosis, and patient demographics on documentation rate were minimal. Conclusion: The study found overall improved ED documentation of trauma patient status in association with implementation of a statewide trauma system. This improvement in documentation suggests an enhanced process of care with trauma system participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-276
Number of pages9
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume4
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Documentation
Hospital Emergency Service
Wounds and Injuries
Vital Signs
Tibia
Craniocerebral Trauma
Femur
Spleen
Head
Demography
Blood Pressure
Thoracic Injuries
Glasgow Coma Scale
Liver
Pupil
Nervous System
Medical Records
Thorax
Databases

Keywords

  • documentation
  • medical records
  • rural trauma
  • trauma system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Hedges, J. R., Mann, N. C., Mullins, R., Rowland, D., Worrall, W., & Zechnich, A. D. (1997). Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation. Academic Emergency Medicine, 4(4), 268-276.

Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation. / Hedges, Jerris R.; Mann, N. Clay; Mullins, Richard; Rowland, Donna; Worrall, William; Zechnich, Andrew D.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1997, p. 268-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hedges, JR, Mann, NC, Mullins, R, Rowland, D, Worrall, W & Zechnich, AD 1997, 'Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 268-276.
Hedges, Jerris R. ; Mann, N. Clay ; Mullins, Richard ; Rowland, Donna ; Worrall, William ; Zechnich, Andrew D. / Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 268-276.
@article{13a9738dc1c54e7bb2d7d4f9658f436d,
title = "Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the association of rural ED patient assessment documentation with state trauma system implementation, hospital trauma categorization level (i.e., Level-3 vs Level-4), injury diagnosis, and patient demographics. Methods: A pre- vs post-system implementation (historical control) analysis of trauma documentation was performed using a sample of rural ED trauma patients from 4 Level-3 and 5 Level-4 trauma hospitals. The medical records of patients with specific index diagnoses in 4 anatomic regions (head, chest, liver/spleen, and femur/open-tibia) were reviewed for 3-year periods before statewide trauma system implementation and after hospital categorization. Vital sign, {\%} inspired O 2, and O 2 saturation determinations were identified relative to the first and the last vital signs documented on the ED record. If not documented in the medical chart within 5 minutes of the first or last ED vital sign assessment, these measurements were considered missing. Separately, neurologic documentation (initial and final) also was sought for patients meeting criteria for an index head injury. Results: Of 1,057 patients entered into the database, 532 were evaluated during the pre-system period and 525 were evaluated during the post-system period. Overall, 47{\%} had a head injury, 34{\%} had a chest injury, 23{\%} had a femur/open-tibia injury, and 12{\%} had a spleen/liver injury. There were 142 (13{\%}) patients with an injury in >1 index area. Except for initial systolic blood pressure, documentation of all other initial and final patient vital signs increased significantly (p <0.05). Documentation of the Glasgow Coma Scale score (initial and final; p = 0.0001) and a final pupil examination on head-injured patients (p = 0.025) also increased. The effects of hospital level, injury diagnosis, and patient demographics on documentation rate were minimal. Conclusion: The study found overall improved ED documentation of trauma patient status in association with implementation of a statewide trauma system. This improvement in documentation suggests an enhanced process of care with trauma system participation.",
keywords = "documentation, medical records, rural trauma, trauma system",
author = "Hedges, {Jerris R.} and Mann, {N. Clay} and Richard Mullins and Donna Rowland and William Worrall and Zechnich, {Andrew D.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "268--276",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation

AU - Hedges, Jerris R.

AU - Mann, N. Clay

AU - Mullins, Richard

AU - Rowland, Donna

AU - Worrall, William

AU - Zechnich, Andrew D.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Objective: To determine the association of rural ED patient assessment documentation with state trauma system implementation, hospital trauma categorization level (i.e., Level-3 vs Level-4), injury diagnosis, and patient demographics. Methods: A pre- vs post-system implementation (historical control) analysis of trauma documentation was performed using a sample of rural ED trauma patients from 4 Level-3 and 5 Level-4 trauma hospitals. The medical records of patients with specific index diagnoses in 4 anatomic regions (head, chest, liver/spleen, and femur/open-tibia) were reviewed for 3-year periods before statewide trauma system implementation and after hospital categorization. Vital sign, % inspired O 2, and O 2 saturation determinations were identified relative to the first and the last vital signs documented on the ED record. If not documented in the medical chart within 5 minutes of the first or last ED vital sign assessment, these measurements were considered missing. Separately, neurologic documentation (initial and final) also was sought for patients meeting criteria for an index head injury. Results: Of 1,057 patients entered into the database, 532 were evaluated during the pre-system period and 525 were evaluated during the post-system period. Overall, 47% had a head injury, 34% had a chest injury, 23% had a femur/open-tibia injury, and 12% had a spleen/liver injury. There were 142 (13%) patients with an injury in >1 index area. Except for initial systolic blood pressure, documentation of all other initial and final patient vital signs increased significantly (p <0.05). Documentation of the Glasgow Coma Scale score (initial and final; p = 0.0001) and a final pupil examination on head-injured patients (p = 0.025) also increased. The effects of hospital level, injury diagnosis, and patient demographics on documentation rate were minimal. Conclusion: The study found overall improved ED documentation of trauma patient status in association with implementation of a statewide trauma system. This improvement in documentation suggests an enhanced process of care with trauma system participation.

AB - Objective: To determine the association of rural ED patient assessment documentation with state trauma system implementation, hospital trauma categorization level (i.e., Level-3 vs Level-4), injury diagnosis, and patient demographics. Methods: A pre- vs post-system implementation (historical control) analysis of trauma documentation was performed using a sample of rural ED trauma patients from 4 Level-3 and 5 Level-4 trauma hospitals. The medical records of patients with specific index diagnoses in 4 anatomic regions (head, chest, liver/spleen, and femur/open-tibia) were reviewed for 3-year periods before statewide trauma system implementation and after hospital categorization. Vital sign, % inspired O 2, and O 2 saturation determinations were identified relative to the first and the last vital signs documented on the ED record. If not documented in the medical chart within 5 minutes of the first or last ED vital sign assessment, these measurements were considered missing. Separately, neurologic documentation (initial and final) also was sought for patients meeting criteria for an index head injury. Results: Of 1,057 patients entered into the database, 532 were evaluated during the pre-system period and 525 were evaluated during the post-system period. Overall, 47% had a head injury, 34% had a chest injury, 23% had a femur/open-tibia injury, and 12% had a spleen/liver injury. There were 142 (13%) patients with an injury in >1 index area. Except for initial systolic blood pressure, documentation of all other initial and final patient vital signs increased significantly (p <0.05). Documentation of the Glasgow Coma Scale score (initial and final; p = 0.0001) and a final pupil examination on head-injured patients (p = 0.025) also increased. The effects of hospital level, injury diagnosis, and patient demographics on documentation rate were minimal. Conclusion: The study found overall improved ED documentation of trauma patient status in association with implementation of a statewide trauma system. This improvement in documentation suggests an enhanced process of care with trauma system participation.

KW - documentation

KW - medical records

KW - rural trauma

KW - trauma system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030890719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030890719&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9107324

AN - SCOPUS:0030890719

VL - 4

SP - 268

EP - 276

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 4

ER -