Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia

Stephen G. O'Brien, François Guilhot, Richard A. Larson, Insa Gathmann, Michele Baccarani, Francisco Cervantes, Jan J. Cornelissen, Thomas Fischer, Andreas Hochhaus, Timothy Hughes, Klaus Lechner, Johan L. Nielsen, Philippe Rousselot, Josy Reiffers, Giuseppe Saglio, John Shepherd, Bengt Simonsson, Alois Gratwohl, John M. Goldman, Hagop KantarjianKerry Taylor, Gregor Verhoef, Ann E. Bolton, Renaud Capdeville, Brian J. Druker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3097 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Imatinib, a selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, produces high response rates in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who have had no response to interferon alfa. We compared the efficacy of imatinib with that of interferon alfa combined with low-dose cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1106 patients to receive imatinib (553 patients) or interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine (553 patients). Crossover to the alternative group was allowed if stringent criteria defining treatment failure or intolerance were met. Patients were evaluated for hematologic and cytogenetic responses, toxic effects, and rates of progression. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 19 months, the estimated rate of a major cytogenetic response (0 to 35 percent of cells in metaphase positive for the Philadelphia chromosome) at 18 months was 87.1 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 84.1 to 90.0) in the imatinib group and 34.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 29.3 to 40.0) in the group given interferon alfa plus cytarabine (P<0.001). The estimated rates of complete cytogenetic response were 76.2 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 72.5 to 79.9) and 14.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 10.5 to 18.5), respectively (P<0.001). At 18 months, the estimated rate of freedom from progression to accelerated-phase or blast-crisis CML was 96.7 percent in the imatinib group and 91.5 percent in the combination-therapy group (P<0.001). Imatinib was better tolerated than combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of hematologic and cytogenetic responses, tolerability, and the likelihood of progression to accelerated-phase or blast-crisis CML, imatinib was superior to interferon alfa plus low-dose cytarabine as first-line therapy in newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)994-1004
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume348
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 13 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this