TY - JOUR
T1 - If you did not document it, it did not happen
T2 - Rates of documentation of discussion of infertility risk in adolescent and young adult oncology patients' medical records
AU - Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
AU - Block, Rebecca G.
AU - Clayman, Marla L.
AU - Kelvin, Joanne
AU - Arvey, Sarah R.
AU - Lee, Ji Hyun
AU - Reinecke, Joyce
AU - Sehovic, Ivana
AU - Jacobsen, Paul B.
AU - Reed, Damon
AU - Gonzalez, Luis
AU - Vadaparampil, Susan T.
AU - Laronga, Christine
AU - Lee, M. Catherine
AU - Pow-Sang, Julio
AU - Eggly, Susan
AU - Franklin, Anna
AU - Shah, Bijal
AU - Fulp, William J.
AU - Hayes-Lattin, Brandon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Purpose: The adolescent and young adult (AYA) population is underserved because of unique late-effect issues, particularly future fertility. This study sought to establish rates of documentation of discussion of risk of infertility, fertility preservation (FP) options, and referrals to fertility specialists in AYA patients' medical records at four cancer centers. Methods: All centers reviewed randomized records within the top four AYA disease sites (breast, leukemia/lymphoma, sarcoma, and testicular). Eligible records included those of patients: diagnosed in 2011, with no prior receipt of gonadotoxic therapy; age 18 to 45 years; with no multiple primary cancers; and for whom record was not second opinion. Quality Oncology Practice Initiative methods were used to evaluate documentation of discussion of risk of infertility, discussion of FP options, and referral to a fertility specialist. Results: Of 231 records, 26% documented infertility risk discussion, 24% documented FP option discussion, and 13% documented referral to a fertility specialist. Records were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk and FP option discussions for female patients (P = .030 and .004, respectively) and those with breast cancer (P = .021 and < .001, respectively). Records for Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk discussion (P = .037). Records were less likely to document infertility risk discussion, FP option discussion, and fertility specialist referral for patients age ≥ 40 years (P < .001, < .001, and .002, respectively) and those who already had children (all P < .001). Conclusion: The overall rate of documentation of discussion of FP is low, and results show disparities among specific groups. Although greater numbers of discussions may be occurring, there is a need to create interventions to improve documentation.
AB - Purpose: The adolescent and young adult (AYA) population is underserved because of unique late-effect issues, particularly future fertility. This study sought to establish rates of documentation of discussion of risk of infertility, fertility preservation (FP) options, and referrals to fertility specialists in AYA patients' medical records at four cancer centers. Methods: All centers reviewed randomized records within the top four AYA disease sites (breast, leukemia/lymphoma, sarcoma, and testicular). Eligible records included those of patients: diagnosed in 2011, with no prior receipt of gonadotoxic therapy; age 18 to 45 years; with no multiple primary cancers; and for whom record was not second opinion. Quality Oncology Practice Initiative methods were used to evaluate documentation of discussion of risk of infertility, discussion of FP options, and referral to a fertility specialist. Results: Of 231 records, 26% documented infertility risk discussion, 24% documented FP option discussion, and 13% documented referral to a fertility specialist. Records were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk and FP option discussions for female patients (P = .030 and .004, respectively) and those with breast cancer (P = .021 and < .001, respectively). Records for Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to contain evidence of infertility risk discussion (P = .037). Records were less likely to document infertility risk discussion, FP option discussion, and fertility specialist referral for patients age ≥ 40 years (P < .001, < .001, and .002, respectively) and those who already had children (all P < .001). Conclusion: The overall rate of documentation of discussion of FP is low, and results show disparities among specific groups. Although greater numbers of discussions may be occurring, there is a need to create interventions to improve documentation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925302856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925302856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JOP.2014.000786
DO - 10.1200/JOP.2014.000786
M3 - Article
C2 - 25549654
AN - SCOPUS:84925302856
SN - 1554-7477
VL - 11
SP - 137
EP - 144
JO - Journal of Oncology Practice
JF - Journal of Oncology Practice
IS - 2
ER -