ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: Pandora's box of personal factors

Rune J. Simeonsson, Donald Lollar, Eva Björck-Åkesson, Mats Granlund, Scott C. Brown, Qiu Zhuoying, David Gray, Yi Pan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this article is to examine the component of "personal factors" described as a contextual factor in the ICF and ICF-CY. Methods: A critical examination of the construct of "personal factors" and description of the component was made with reference to conceptual and taxonomic criteria. Results: The "personal factors" component in the ICF/ICF-CY is not defined, there is no taxonomy of codes, there is no explicit purpose stated for its use and no guidelines are provided for its application. In spite of these constraints, the component of "personal factors" is being applied as part of the classifications. Such uncontrolled applications constitute significant risks for the status of ICF/ICF-CY as the WHO reference classification in that: (a) the component is accepted for use by default simply by being applied; (b) component content is expanded with idiosyncratic exemplars by users; and (c) there is potential misuse of "personal factors" in documenting personal attributes, including "blaming the victim". Conclusion: In the absence of formal codes, any application of the component of "personal factors" lacks the legitimacy that documentation with a scientific taxonomy should provide. Given the growing use of the ICF/ICF-CY globally, a priority for the revision process should be to determine if there is in fact need for "personal" or any other factors in the ICF/ICF-CY.Implications for RehabilitationA central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors.As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts.As there are no codes of "personal factors", there is no basis for documentation of the component.Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded in customary formats, independent of any component or codes of the ICF/ICF-CY.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2187-2194
Number of pages8
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Volume36
Issue number25
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Illegitimacy
Documentation
Language
Rehabilitation
Demography
Guidelines
Power (Psychology)
Identification (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Classification
  • ICF
  • ICF-CY
  • Personal factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Simeonsson, R. J., Lollar, D., Björck-Åkesson, E., Granlund, M., Brown, S. C., Zhuoying, Q., ... Pan, Y. (2014). ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: Pandora's box of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(25), 2187-2194. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.892638

ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned : Pandora's box of personal factors. / Simeonsson, Rune J.; Lollar, Donald; Björck-Åkesson, Eva; Granlund, Mats; Brown, Scott C.; Zhuoying, Qiu; Gray, David; Pan, Yi.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 36, No. 25, 01.12.2014, p. 2187-2194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simeonsson, RJ, Lollar, D, Björck-Åkesson, E, Granlund, M, Brown, SC, Zhuoying, Q, Gray, D & Pan, Y 2014, 'ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: Pandora's box of personal factors', Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 36, no. 25, pp. 2187-2194. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.892638
Simeonsson RJ, Lollar D, Björck-Åkesson E, Granlund M, Brown SC, Zhuoying Q et al. ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: Pandora's box of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2014 Dec 1;36(25):2187-2194. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.892638
Simeonsson, Rune J. ; Lollar, Donald ; Björck-Åkesson, Eva ; Granlund, Mats ; Brown, Scott C. ; Zhuoying, Qiu ; Gray, David ; Pan, Yi. / ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned : Pandora's box of personal factors. In: Disability and Rehabilitation. 2014 ; Vol. 36, No. 25. pp. 2187-2194.
@article{ad5088dd453941aeb20278e5e07f73b9,
title = "ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: Pandora's box of personal factors",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this article is to examine the component of {"}personal factors{"} described as a contextual factor in the ICF and ICF-CY. Methods: A critical examination of the construct of {"}personal factors{"} and description of the component was made with reference to conceptual and taxonomic criteria. Results: The {"}personal factors{"} component in the ICF/ICF-CY is not defined, there is no taxonomy of codes, there is no explicit purpose stated for its use and no guidelines are provided for its application. In spite of these constraints, the component of {"}personal factors{"} is being applied as part of the classifications. Such uncontrolled applications constitute significant risks for the status of ICF/ICF-CY as the WHO reference classification in that: (a) the component is accepted for use by default simply by being applied; (b) component content is expanded with idiosyncratic exemplars by users; and (c) there is potential misuse of {"}personal factors{"} in documenting personal attributes, including {"}blaming the victim{"}. Conclusion: In the absence of formal codes, any application of the component of {"}personal factors{"} lacks the legitimacy that documentation with a scientific taxonomy should provide. Given the growing use of the ICF/ICF-CY globally, a priority for the revision process should be to determine if there is in fact need for {"}personal{"} or any other factors in the ICF/ICF-CY.Implications for RehabilitationA central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors.As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts.As there are no codes of {"}personal factors{"}, there is no basis for documentation of the component.Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded in customary formats, independent of any component or codes of the ICF/ICF-CY.",
keywords = "Classification, ICF, ICF-CY, Personal factors",
author = "Simeonsson, {Rune J.} and Donald Lollar and Eva Bj{\"o}rck-{\AA}kesson and Mats Granlund and Brown, {Scott C.} and Qiu Zhuoying and David Gray and Yi Pan",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/09638288.2014.892638",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2187--2194",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "25",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned

T2 - Pandora's box of personal factors

AU - Simeonsson, Rune J.

AU - Lollar, Donald

AU - Björck-Åkesson, Eva

AU - Granlund, Mats

AU - Brown, Scott C.

AU - Zhuoying, Qiu

AU - Gray, David

AU - Pan, Yi

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this article is to examine the component of "personal factors" described as a contextual factor in the ICF and ICF-CY. Methods: A critical examination of the construct of "personal factors" and description of the component was made with reference to conceptual and taxonomic criteria. Results: The "personal factors" component in the ICF/ICF-CY is not defined, there is no taxonomy of codes, there is no explicit purpose stated for its use and no guidelines are provided for its application. In spite of these constraints, the component of "personal factors" is being applied as part of the classifications. Such uncontrolled applications constitute significant risks for the status of ICF/ICF-CY as the WHO reference classification in that: (a) the component is accepted for use by default simply by being applied; (b) component content is expanded with idiosyncratic exemplars by users; and (c) there is potential misuse of "personal factors" in documenting personal attributes, including "blaming the victim". Conclusion: In the absence of formal codes, any application of the component of "personal factors" lacks the legitimacy that documentation with a scientific taxonomy should provide. Given the growing use of the ICF/ICF-CY globally, a priority for the revision process should be to determine if there is in fact need for "personal" or any other factors in the ICF/ICF-CY.Implications for RehabilitationA central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors.As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts.As there are no codes of "personal factors", there is no basis for documentation of the component.Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded in customary formats, independent of any component or codes of the ICF/ICF-CY.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this article is to examine the component of "personal factors" described as a contextual factor in the ICF and ICF-CY. Methods: A critical examination of the construct of "personal factors" and description of the component was made with reference to conceptual and taxonomic criteria. Results: The "personal factors" component in the ICF/ICF-CY is not defined, there is no taxonomy of codes, there is no explicit purpose stated for its use and no guidelines are provided for its application. In spite of these constraints, the component of "personal factors" is being applied as part of the classifications. Such uncontrolled applications constitute significant risks for the status of ICF/ICF-CY as the WHO reference classification in that: (a) the component is accepted for use by default simply by being applied; (b) component content is expanded with idiosyncratic exemplars by users; and (c) there is potential misuse of "personal factors" in documenting personal attributes, including "blaming the victim". Conclusion: In the absence of formal codes, any application of the component of "personal factors" lacks the legitimacy that documentation with a scientific taxonomy should provide. Given the growing use of the ICF/ICF-CY globally, a priority for the revision process should be to determine if there is in fact need for "personal" or any other factors in the ICF/ICF-CY.Implications for RehabilitationA central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors.As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts.As there are no codes of "personal factors", there is no basis for documentation of the component.Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded in customary formats, independent of any component or codes of the ICF/ICF-CY.

KW - Classification

KW - ICF

KW - ICF-CY

KW - Personal factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916605827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916605827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/09638288.2014.892638

DO - 10.3109/09638288.2014.892638

M3 - Article

C2 - 24601863

AN - SCOPUS:84916605827

VL - 36

SP - 2187

EP - 2194

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 25

ER -