How to select balance measures sensitive to parkinson’s disease from body-worn inertial sensors—separating the trees from the forest

Naoya Hasegawa, Vrutangkumar V. Shah, Patricia Carlson-Kuhta, John Nutt, Fay Horak, Martina Mancini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the most sensitive objective measures of balance dysfunction that differ between people with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and healthy controls. One-hundred and forty-four people with PD and 79 age-matched healthy controls wore eight inertial sensors while performing tasks to measure five domains of balance: standing posture (Sway), anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), automatic postural responses (APRs), dynamic posture (Gait) and limits of stability (LOS). To reduce the initial 93 measures, we selected uncorrelated measures that were most sensitive to PD. After applying a threshold on the Standardized Mean Difference between PD and healthy controls, 44 measures remained; and after reducing highly correlated measures, 24 measures remained. The four most sensitive measures were from APAs and Gait domains. The random forest with 10-fold cross-validation on the remaining measures (n = 24) showed an accuracy to separate PD from healthy controls of 82.4%—identical to result for all measures. Measures from the most sensitive domains, APAs and Gait, were significantly correlated with the severity of disease and with patient-related outcomes. This method greatly reduced the objective measures of balance to the most sensitive for PD, while still capturing four of the five domains of balance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3320
JournalSensors (Switzerland)
Volume19
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Parkinson disease
Parkinson Disease
Gait
gait
Posture
posture
adjusting
Forests
Dynamic response
Wear of materials
dynamic response
Sensors

Keywords

  • Balance dysfunction
  • Feature selection
  • Inertial measurement unit
  • Objective measures
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Wearable technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Biochemistry
  • Instrumentation
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

How to select balance measures sensitive to parkinson’s disease from body-worn inertial sensors—separating the trees from the forest. / Hasegawa, Naoya; Shah, Vrutangkumar V.; Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia; Nutt, John; Horak, Fay; Mancini, Martina.

In: Sensors (Switzerland), Vol. 19, No. 15, 3320, 01.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6f3627fbc3144be7a6b86f10a457b7ed,
title = "How to select balance measures sensitive to parkinson’s disease from body-worn inertial sensors—separating the trees from the forest",
abstract = "This study aimed to determine the most sensitive objective measures of balance dysfunction that differ between people with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and healthy controls. One-hundred and forty-four people with PD and 79 age-matched healthy controls wore eight inertial sensors while performing tasks to measure five domains of balance: standing posture (Sway), anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), automatic postural responses (APRs), dynamic posture (Gait) and limits of stability (LOS). To reduce the initial 93 measures, we selected uncorrelated measures that were most sensitive to PD. After applying a threshold on the Standardized Mean Difference between PD and healthy controls, 44 measures remained; and after reducing highly correlated measures, 24 measures remained. The four most sensitive measures were from APAs and Gait domains. The random forest with 10-fold cross-validation on the remaining measures (n = 24) showed an accuracy to separate PD from healthy controls of 82.4{\%}—identical to result for all measures. Measures from the most sensitive domains, APAs and Gait, were significantly correlated with the severity of disease and with patient-related outcomes. This method greatly reduced the objective measures of balance to the most sensitive for PD, while still capturing four of the five domains of balance.",
keywords = "Balance dysfunction, Feature selection, Inertial measurement unit, Objective measures, Parkinson’s disease, Wearable technology",
author = "Naoya Hasegawa and Shah, {Vrutangkumar V.} and Patricia Carlson-Kuhta and John Nutt and Fay Horak and Martina Mancini",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/s19153320",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
journal = "Sensors",
issn = "1424-3210",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to select balance measures sensitive to parkinson’s disease from body-worn inertial sensors—separating the trees from the forest

AU - Hasegawa, Naoya

AU - Shah, Vrutangkumar V.

AU - Carlson-Kuhta, Patricia

AU - Nutt, John

AU - Horak, Fay

AU - Mancini, Martina

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - This study aimed to determine the most sensitive objective measures of balance dysfunction that differ between people with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and healthy controls. One-hundred and forty-four people with PD and 79 age-matched healthy controls wore eight inertial sensors while performing tasks to measure five domains of balance: standing posture (Sway), anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), automatic postural responses (APRs), dynamic posture (Gait) and limits of stability (LOS). To reduce the initial 93 measures, we selected uncorrelated measures that were most sensitive to PD. After applying a threshold on the Standardized Mean Difference between PD and healthy controls, 44 measures remained; and after reducing highly correlated measures, 24 measures remained. The four most sensitive measures were from APAs and Gait domains. The random forest with 10-fold cross-validation on the remaining measures (n = 24) showed an accuracy to separate PD from healthy controls of 82.4%—identical to result for all measures. Measures from the most sensitive domains, APAs and Gait, were significantly correlated with the severity of disease and with patient-related outcomes. This method greatly reduced the objective measures of balance to the most sensitive for PD, while still capturing four of the five domains of balance.

AB - This study aimed to determine the most sensitive objective measures of balance dysfunction that differ between people with Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and healthy controls. One-hundred and forty-four people with PD and 79 age-matched healthy controls wore eight inertial sensors while performing tasks to measure five domains of balance: standing posture (Sway), anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs), automatic postural responses (APRs), dynamic posture (Gait) and limits of stability (LOS). To reduce the initial 93 measures, we selected uncorrelated measures that were most sensitive to PD. After applying a threshold on the Standardized Mean Difference between PD and healthy controls, 44 measures remained; and after reducing highly correlated measures, 24 measures remained. The four most sensitive measures were from APAs and Gait domains. The random forest with 10-fold cross-validation on the remaining measures (n = 24) showed an accuracy to separate PD from healthy controls of 82.4%—identical to result for all measures. Measures from the most sensitive domains, APAs and Gait, were significantly correlated with the severity of disease and with patient-related outcomes. This method greatly reduced the objective measures of balance to the most sensitive for PD, while still capturing four of the five domains of balance.

KW - Balance dysfunction

KW - Feature selection

KW - Inertial measurement unit

KW - Objective measures

KW - Parkinson’s disease

KW - Wearable technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070562142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070562142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/s19153320

DO - 10.3390/s19153320

M3 - Article

VL - 19

JO - Sensors

JF - Sensors

SN - 1424-3210

IS - 15

M1 - 3320

ER -