How strong is the evidence for mediational hypotheses of age-related memory loss?

Martin Sliwinski, Scott Hofer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Luszcz and Bryan review research supporting three theories of age-related memory loss: the speed hypothesis, the executive function hypothesis, and the common cause hypothesis. Objective: The aim of this commentary is to extend that review by encouraging consideration of the strength (or lack thereof) of the empirical evidence supporting theories of age-related memory loss. Methods: Arguments are presented that call into the question the strength of the evidence that derives from cross-sectional analysis of individual difference sources of variance. Results: Supporting evidence for mediational hypotheses of cognitive aging (1) derives from potentially ambiguous statistical techniques; (2) is based on untested assumptions about the between and within person sources of variance; (3) is not supported by longitudinal studies, and (4) relies heavily on arguments of parsimony. Conclusions: Existing evidence is not strong enough to grant any particular theory presumptive status. We concur with Luszcz and Bryan that supplementing the now popular individual differences research designs with alternative approaches would advance theory development and testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-354
Number of pages4
JournalGerontology
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Memory Disorders
Individuality
Executive Function
Longitudinal Studies
Research Design
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research
Cognitive Aging

Keywords

  • Ageing
  • Memory
  • Method
  • Speed of processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

How strong is the evidence for mediational hypotheses of age-related memory loss? / Sliwinski, Martin; Hofer, Scott.

In: Gerontology, Vol. 45, No. 6, 1999, p. 351-354.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63a3e43c832b461b95f013379bdffdb1,
title = "How strong is the evidence for mediational hypotheses of age-related memory loss?",
abstract = "Background: Luszcz and Bryan review research supporting three theories of age-related memory loss: the speed hypothesis, the executive function hypothesis, and the common cause hypothesis. Objective: The aim of this commentary is to extend that review by encouraging consideration of the strength (or lack thereof) of the empirical evidence supporting theories of age-related memory loss. Methods: Arguments are presented that call into the question the strength of the evidence that derives from cross-sectional analysis of individual difference sources of variance. Results: Supporting evidence for mediational hypotheses of cognitive aging (1) derives from potentially ambiguous statistical techniques; (2) is based on untested assumptions about the between and within person sources of variance; (3) is not supported by longitudinal studies, and (4) relies heavily on arguments of parsimony. Conclusions: Existing evidence is not strong enough to grant any particular theory presumptive status. We concur with Luszcz and Bryan that supplementing the now popular individual differences research designs with alternative approaches would advance theory development and testing.",
keywords = "Ageing, Memory, Method, Speed of processing",
author = "Martin Sliwinski and Scott Hofer",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1159/000022120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "351--354",
journal = "Gerontology",
issn = "0304-324X",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How strong is the evidence for mediational hypotheses of age-related memory loss?

AU - Sliwinski, Martin

AU - Hofer, Scott

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Background: Luszcz and Bryan review research supporting three theories of age-related memory loss: the speed hypothesis, the executive function hypothesis, and the common cause hypothesis. Objective: The aim of this commentary is to extend that review by encouraging consideration of the strength (or lack thereof) of the empirical evidence supporting theories of age-related memory loss. Methods: Arguments are presented that call into the question the strength of the evidence that derives from cross-sectional analysis of individual difference sources of variance. Results: Supporting evidence for mediational hypotheses of cognitive aging (1) derives from potentially ambiguous statistical techniques; (2) is based on untested assumptions about the between and within person sources of variance; (3) is not supported by longitudinal studies, and (4) relies heavily on arguments of parsimony. Conclusions: Existing evidence is not strong enough to grant any particular theory presumptive status. We concur with Luszcz and Bryan that supplementing the now popular individual differences research designs with alternative approaches would advance theory development and testing.

AB - Background: Luszcz and Bryan review research supporting three theories of age-related memory loss: the speed hypothesis, the executive function hypothesis, and the common cause hypothesis. Objective: The aim of this commentary is to extend that review by encouraging consideration of the strength (or lack thereof) of the empirical evidence supporting theories of age-related memory loss. Methods: Arguments are presented that call into the question the strength of the evidence that derives from cross-sectional analysis of individual difference sources of variance. Results: Supporting evidence for mediational hypotheses of cognitive aging (1) derives from potentially ambiguous statistical techniques; (2) is based on untested assumptions about the between and within person sources of variance; (3) is not supported by longitudinal studies, and (4) relies heavily on arguments of parsimony. Conclusions: Existing evidence is not strong enough to grant any particular theory presumptive status. We concur with Luszcz and Bryan that supplementing the now popular individual differences research designs with alternative approaches would advance theory development and testing.

KW - Ageing

KW - Memory

KW - Method

KW - Speed of processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032726645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032726645&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000022120

DO - 10.1159/000022120

M3 - Article

C2 - 10559657

AN - SCOPUS:0032726645

VL - 45

SP - 351

EP - 354

JO - Gerontology

JF - Gerontology

SN - 0304-324X

IS - 6

ER -