How should an incident case of atopic dermatitis be defined? A systematic review of primary prevention studies

Eric Simpson, Laura E. Keck, Joanne R. Chalmers, Hywel C. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Eczema prevention is now an active area of dermatologic and allergy research. Defining an incident case is therefore a prerequisite for such a study. Objective: We sought to examine how an incident case of atopic dermatitis was defined in previous atopic dermatitis prevention studies in order to make recommendations on a standard definition of new atopic dermatitis cases for use in future prevention trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of controlled interventional atopic dermatitis prevention studies by using searches of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for studies published from 1980 to the end of January 2011. Studies that included atopic dermatitis as a secondary outcome, such as asthma prevention trials, were included. Results: One hundred two studies were included in the final analysis, of which 27 (26.5%) did not describe any criteria for defining an incident case of atopic dermatitis. Of the remaining 75 studies with reported disease criteria, the Hanifin-Rajka criteria were the most commonly used (28 studies). A disease definition unique to that particular study (21 studies) was the second most commonly used disease definition, although the sources for such novel definitions were not cited. Conclusions: The results from this systematic review highlight the need for improved reporting and standardization of the definition used for an incident case in atopic dermatitis prevention studies. Most prevention studies have used disease definitions such as the Hanifin-Rajka criteria that include disease chronicity. While acceptable for cumulative incidence outcomes, inclusion of disease chronicity precludes the precise measurement of disease onset. We propose a definition based on existing scientific studies that could be used in future prospective studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-144
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume130
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Atopic Dermatitis
Primary Prevention
Eczema
Cytomegalovirus Infections
MEDLINE
Hypersensitivity
Asthma
Databases
Prospective Studies
Incidence
Research

Keywords

  • atopic dermatitis
  • definition
  • disease criteria
  • eczema
  • incident case
  • Outcomes
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

How should an incident case of atopic dermatitis be defined? A systematic review of primary prevention studies. / Simpson, Eric; Keck, Laura E.; Chalmers, Joanne R.; Williams, Hywel C.

In: Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 130, No. 1, 07.2012, p. 137-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2bd7fc887c74682a082fa342c4f0eaa,
title = "How should an incident case of atopic dermatitis be defined? A systematic review of primary prevention studies",
abstract = "Background: Eczema prevention is now an active area of dermatologic and allergy research. Defining an incident case is therefore a prerequisite for such a study. Objective: We sought to examine how an incident case of atopic dermatitis was defined in previous atopic dermatitis prevention studies in order to make recommendations on a standard definition of new atopic dermatitis cases for use in future prevention trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of controlled interventional atopic dermatitis prevention studies by using searches of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for studies published from 1980 to the end of January 2011. Studies that included atopic dermatitis as a secondary outcome, such as asthma prevention trials, were included. Results: One hundred two studies were included in the final analysis, of which 27 (26.5{\%}) did not describe any criteria for defining an incident case of atopic dermatitis. Of the remaining 75 studies with reported disease criteria, the Hanifin-Rajka criteria were the most commonly used (28 studies). A disease definition unique to that particular study (21 studies) was the second most commonly used disease definition, although the sources for such novel definitions were not cited. Conclusions: The results from this systematic review highlight the need for improved reporting and standardization of the definition used for an incident case in atopic dermatitis prevention studies. Most prevention studies have used disease definitions such as the Hanifin-Rajka criteria that include disease chronicity. While acceptable for cumulative incidence outcomes, inclusion of disease chronicity precludes the precise measurement of disease onset. We propose a definition based on existing scientific studies that could be used in future prospective studies.",
keywords = "atopic dermatitis, definition, disease criteria, eczema, incident case, Outcomes, systematic review",
author = "Eric Simpson and Keck, {Laura E.} and Chalmers, {Joanne R.} and Williams, {Hywel C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.075",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "137--144",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "0091-6749",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How should an incident case of atopic dermatitis be defined? A systematic review of primary prevention studies

AU - Simpson, Eric

AU - Keck, Laura E.

AU - Chalmers, Joanne R.

AU - Williams, Hywel C.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Background: Eczema prevention is now an active area of dermatologic and allergy research. Defining an incident case is therefore a prerequisite for such a study. Objective: We sought to examine how an incident case of atopic dermatitis was defined in previous atopic dermatitis prevention studies in order to make recommendations on a standard definition of new atopic dermatitis cases for use in future prevention trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of controlled interventional atopic dermatitis prevention studies by using searches of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for studies published from 1980 to the end of January 2011. Studies that included atopic dermatitis as a secondary outcome, such as asthma prevention trials, were included. Results: One hundred two studies were included in the final analysis, of which 27 (26.5%) did not describe any criteria for defining an incident case of atopic dermatitis. Of the remaining 75 studies with reported disease criteria, the Hanifin-Rajka criteria were the most commonly used (28 studies). A disease definition unique to that particular study (21 studies) was the second most commonly used disease definition, although the sources for such novel definitions were not cited. Conclusions: The results from this systematic review highlight the need for improved reporting and standardization of the definition used for an incident case in atopic dermatitis prevention studies. Most prevention studies have used disease definitions such as the Hanifin-Rajka criteria that include disease chronicity. While acceptable for cumulative incidence outcomes, inclusion of disease chronicity precludes the precise measurement of disease onset. We propose a definition based on existing scientific studies that could be used in future prospective studies.

AB - Background: Eczema prevention is now an active area of dermatologic and allergy research. Defining an incident case is therefore a prerequisite for such a study. Objective: We sought to examine how an incident case of atopic dermatitis was defined in previous atopic dermatitis prevention studies in order to make recommendations on a standard definition of new atopic dermatitis cases for use in future prevention trials. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of controlled interventional atopic dermatitis prevention studies by using searches of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for studies published from 1980 to the end of January 2011. Studies that included atopic dermatitis as a secondary outcome, such as asthma prevention trials, were included. Results: One hundred two studies were included in the final analysis, of which 27 (26.5%) did not describe any criteria for defining an incident case of atopic dermatitis. Of the remaining 75 studies with reported disease criteria, the Hanifin-Rajka criteria were the most commonly used (28 studies). A disease definition unique to that particular study (21 studies) was the second most commonly used disease definition, although the sources for such novel definitions were not cited. Conclusions: The results from this systematic review highlight the need for improved reporting and standardization of the definition used for an incident case in atopic dermatitis prevention studies. Most prevention studies have used disease definitions such as the Hanifin-Rajka criteria that include disease chronicity. While acceptable for cumulative incidence outcomes, inclusion of disease chronicity precludes the precise measurement of disease onset. We propose a definition based on existing scientific studies that could be used in future prospective studies.

KW - atopic dermatitis

KW - definition

KW - disease criteria

KW - eczema

KW - incident case

KW - Outcomes

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862890086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862890086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.075

DO - 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.075

M3 - Article

C2 - 22424882

AN - SCOPUS:84862890086

VL - 130

SP - 137

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 0091-6749

IS - 1

ER -