How are clinician-educators evaluated for educational excellence? A survey of promotion and tenure committee members in the United States

Michael S. Ryan, Constance Tucker, Deborah DiazGranados, Latha Chandran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In recent years, educational leaders have proposed domains of educational excellence and corresponding metrics to objectively measure contributions of clinician-educators for promotion and tenure (P&T). The purpose of this study was to explore whether P&T committees in United States (US) have incorporated these recommendations into practice. Method: The authors conducted a survey of P&T leaders across institutions in US. Items included questions related to institutional tracks for P&T, domains included in promotional packets, metrics for their measurement, and use of an Educator's Portfolio (EP). Results: Respondents from 55 institutions completed the survey. The presence of a teaching academy/society was associated with the presence of a promotion track for clinician-educators (p = 0.04). Only teaching activities (91%), assessment of learners (55%), and educational scholarship (51%) were required by a majority of institutions. Few institutions used objective methods for measuring impact and less than half (47%) required an EP. Discussion: These results highlight both progress in the recognition of clinician-educators while also suggesting discordance in the perspective of educational leaders and the practice of P&T committees. The authors advocate for establishing a national community of expert medical educators who may assist P&T committees in adopting consensus-based criteria and metrics to evaluate clinician-educators' contributions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical Teacher
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

promotion
educator
leader
Teaching
academy
expert
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

How are clinician-educators evaluated for educational excellence? A survey of promotion and tenure committee members in the United States. / Ryan, Michael S.; Tucker, Constance; DiazGranados, Deborah; Chandran, Latha.

In: Medical Teacher, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{19164689adcd4916b8dcfaa63a19fd92,
title = "How are clinician-educators evaluated for educational excellence? A survey of promotion and tenure committee members in the United States",
abstract = "Background: In recent years, educational leaders have proposed domains of educational excellence and corresponding metrics to objectively measure contributions of clinician-educators for promotion and tenure (P&T). The purpose of this study was to explore whether P&T committees in United States (US) have incorporated these recommendations into practice. Method: The authors conducted a survey of P&T leaders across institutions in US. Items included questions related to institutional tracks for P&T, domains included in promotional packets, metrics for their measurement, and use of an Educator's Portfolio (EP). Results: Respondents from 55 institutions completed the survey. The presence of a teaching academy/society was associated with the presence of a promotion track for clinician-educators (p = 0.04). Only teaching activities (91{\%}), assessment of learners (55{\%}), and educational scholarship (51{\%}) were required by a majority of institutions. Few institutions used objective methods for measuring impact and less than half (47{\%}) required an EP. Discussion: These results highlight both progress in the recognition of clinician-educators while also suggesting discordance in the perspective of educational leaders and the practice of P&T committees. The authors advocate for establishing a national community of expert medical educators who may assist P&T committees in adopting consensus-based criteria and metrics to evaluate clinician-educators' contributions.",
author = "Ryan, {Michael S.} and Constance Tucker and Deborah DiazGranados and Latha Chandran",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0142159X.2019.1596237",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How are clinician-educators evaluated for educational excellence? A survey of promotion and tenure committee members in the United States

AU - Ryan, Michael S.

AU - Tucker, Constance

AU - DiazGranados, Deborah

AU - Chandran, Latha

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: In recent years, educational leaders have proposed domains of educational excellence and corresponding metrics to objectively measure contributions of clinician-educators for promotion and tenure (P&T). The purpose of this study was to explore whether P&T committees in United States (US) have incorporated these recommendations into practice. Method: The authors conducted a survey of P&T leaders across institutions in US. Items included questions related to institutional tracks for P&T, domains included in promotional packets, metrics for their measurement, and use of an Educator's Portfolio (EP). Results: Respondents from 55 institutions completed the survey. The presence of a teaching academy/society was associated with the presence of a promotion track for clinician-educators (p = 0.04). Only teaching activities (91%), assessment of learners (55%), and educational scholarship (51%) were required by a majority of institutions. Few institutions used objective methods for measuring impact and less than half (47%) required an EP. Discussion: These results highlight both progress in the recognition of clinician-educators while also suggesting discordance in the perspective of educational leaders and the practice of P&T committees. The authors advocate for establishing a national community of expert medical educators who may assist P&T committees in adopting consensus-based criteria and metrics to evaluate clinician-educators' contributions.

AB - Background: In recent years, educational leaders have proposed domains of educational excellence and corresponding metrics to objectively measure contributions of clinician-educators for promotion and tenure (P&T). The purpose of this study was to explore whether P&T committees in United States (US) have incorporated these recommendations into practice. Method: The authors conducted a survey of P&T leaders across institutions in US. Items included questions related to institutional tracks for P&T, domains included in promotional packets, metrics for their measurement, and use of an Educator's Portfolio (EP). Results: Respondents from 55 institutions completed the survey. The presence of a teaching academy/society was associated with the presence of a promotion track for clinician-educators (p = 0.04). Only teaching activities (91%), assessment of learners (55%), and educational scholarship (51%) were required by a majority of institutions. Few institutions used objective methods for measuring impact and less than half (47%) required an EP. Discussion: These results highlight both progress in the recognition of clinician-educators while also suggesting discordance in the perspective of educational leaders and the practice of P&T committees. The authors advocate for establishing a national community of expert medical educators who may assist P&T committees in adopting consensus-based criteria and metrics to evaluate clinician-educators' contributions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064649753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064649753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1596237

DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1596237

M3 - Article

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

ER -