How accurately can Emergency Department providers estimate patient satisfaction?

Lalena Yarris, Brooke Frakes, Nathan Magaret, Annette L. Adams, Heather Brooks, Robert Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Patient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could accurately estimate overall patient satisfaction. Methods: We surveyed ED patients regarding satisfaction with their care. Treating providers completed analogous surveys, estimating patients' responses. Sexual assault victims and non-English-speaking or severely ill patients were excluded. Satisfaction responses were categorized as "satisfied" or "not satisfied." Patient satisfaction scores were considered the "gold standard," and providers' perceptions of the patient satisfaction were considered tests. Measures of diagnostic accuracy, such as positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity, were used to assess how accurately the provider could estimate his or her patient's satisfaction. Results: Here, 242/457 eligible patients (53%) completed the survey; 227 providers (94%) completed a corresponding survey. Subject-reported overall satisfaction was 96.6%, compared with a providerestimated rate of 94.4%. The sensitivity and PPV of the provider's estimate of the patient's satisfaction were 95.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4, 97.7) and 97.5 (95% CI 94.4, 99.2), respectively, for overall patient satisfaction. The PPV was similar for clarity of communication. The PPV was 78.9 for perceived length of ED stay (99% CI 70.8, 85.6) and 82.6 for quality of pain control (95% CI 68.6, 92.2). Accuracy of attending and resident estimates of patient satisfaction did not differ significantly. The agreement between patient-reported and provider-estimated patient satisfaction was not associated with age, gender, patient disposition, or ED divert status. Conclusion: Providers are able to assess overall patient satisfaction and clarity of communication with a high accuracy. Physician estimates of pain control and perceived length of stay have a moderate accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-357
Number of pages7
JournalWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Patient Satisfaction
Hospital Emergency Service
Confidence Intervals
Aptitude
Communication
Pain
Quality of Health Care
Quality Control
Length of Stay
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

How accurately can Emergency Department providers estimate patient satisfaction? / Yarris, Lalena; Frakes, Brooke; Magaret, Nathan; Adams, Annette L.; Brooks, Heather; Norton, Robert.

In: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 09.2012, p. 351-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yarris, Lalena ; Frakes, Brooke ; Magaret, Nathan ; Adams, Annette L. ; Brooks, Heather ; Norton, Robert. / How accurately can Emergency Department providers estimate patient satisfaction?. In: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 351-357.
@article{178ac9cd94c245b89580d607e1168838,
title = "How accurately can Emergency Department providers estimate patient satisfaction?",
abstract = "Introduction: Patient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could accurately estimate overall patient satisfaction. Methods: We surveyed ED patients regarding satisfaction with their care. Treating providers completed analogous surveys, estimating patients' responses. Sexual assault victims and non-English-speaking or severely ill patients were excluded. Satisfaction responses were categorized as {"}satisfied{"} or {"}not satisfied.{"} Patient satisfaction scores were considered the {"}gold standard,{"} and providers' perceptions of the patient satisfaction were considered tests. Measures of diagnostic accuracy, such as positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity, were used to assess how accurately the provider could estimate his or her patient's satisfaction. Results: Here, 242/457 eligible patients (53{\%}) completed the survey; 227 providers (94{\%}) completed a corresponding survey. Subject-reported overall satisfaction was 96.6{\%}, compared with a providerestimated rate of 94.4{\%}. The sensitivity and PPV of the provider's estimate of the patient's satisfaction were 95.2 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 91.4, 97.7) and 97.5 (95{\%} CI 94.4, 99.2), respectively, for overall patient satisfaction. The PPV was similar for clarity of communication. The PPV was 78.9 for perceived length of ED stay (99{\%} CI 70.8, 85.6) and 82.6 for quality of pain control (95{\%} CI 68.6, 92.2). Accuracy of attending and resident estimates of patient satisfaction did not differ significantly. The agreement between patient-reported and provider-estimated patient satisfaction was not associated with age, gender, patient disposition, or ED divert status. Conclusion: Providers are able to assess overall patient satisfaction and clarity of communication with a high accuracy. Physician estimates of pain control and perceived length of stay have a moderate accuracy.",
author = "Lalena Yarris and Brooke Frakes and Nathan Magaret and Adams, {Annette L.} and Heather Brooks and Robert Norton",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6644",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "351--357",
journal = "Western Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1936-900X",
publisher = "University of California",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How accurately can Emergency Department providers estimate patient satisfaction?

AU - Yarris, Lalena

AU - Frakes, Brooke

AU - Magaret, Nathan

AU - Adams, Annette L.

AU - Brooks, Heather

AU - Norton, Robert

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Introduction: Patient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could accurately estimate overall patient satisfaction. Methods: We surveyed ED patients regarding satisfaction with their care. Treating providers completed analogous surveys, estimating patients' responses. Sexual assault victims and non-English-speaking or severely ill patients were excluded. Satisfaction responses were categorized as "satisfied" or "not satisfied." Patient satisfaction scores were considered the "gold standard," and providers' perceptions of the patient satisfaction were considered tests. Measures of diagnostic accuracy, such as positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity, were used to assess how accurately the provider could estimate his or her patient's satisfaction. Results: Here, 242/457 eligible patients (53%) completed the survey; 227 providers (94%) completed a corresponding survey. Subject-reported overall satisfaction was 96.6%, compared with a providerestimated rate of 94.4%. The sensitivity and PPV of the provider's estimate of the patient's satisfaction were 95.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4, 97.7) and 97.5 (95% CI 94.4, 99.2), respectively, for overall patient satisfaction. The PPV was similar for clarity of communication. The PPV was 78.9 for perceived length of ED stay (99% CI 70.8, 85.6) and 82.6 for quality of pain control (95% CI 68.6, 92.2). Accuracy of attending and resident estimates of patient satisfaction did not differ significantly. The agreement between patient-reported and provider-estimated patient satisfaction was not associated with age, gender, patient disposition, or ED divert status. Conclusion: Providers are able to assess overall patient satisfaction and clarity of communication with a high accuracy. Physician estimates of pain control and perceived length of stay have a moderate accuracy.

AB - Introduction: Patient satisfaction is an important measure of emergency department (ED) quality of care. Little is known about providers' ability to estimate patient satisfaction. We aimed to measure providers' ability to assess patient satisfaction and hypothesized that providers could accurately estimate overall patient satisfaction. Methods: We surveyed ED patients regarding satisfaction with their care. Treating providers completed analogous surveys, estimating patients' responses. Sexual assault victims and non-English-speaking or severely ill patients were excluded. Satisfaction responses were categorized as "satisfied" or "not satisfied." Patient satisfaction scores were considered the "gold standard," and providers' perceptions of the patient satisfaction were considered tests. Measures of diagnostic accuracy, such as positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity, were used to assess how accurately the provider could estimate his or her patient's satisfaction. Results: Here, 242/457 eligible patients (53%) completed the survey; 227 providers (94%) completed a corresponding survey. Subject-reported overall satisfaction was 96.6%, compared with a providerestimated rate of 94.4%. The sensitivity and PPV of the provider's estimate of the patient's satisfaction were 95.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.4, 97.7) and 97.5 (95% CI 94.4, 99.2), respectively, for overall patient satisfaction. The PPV was similar for clarity of communication. The PPV was 78.9 for perceived length of ED stay (99% CI 70.8, 85.6) and 82.6 for quality of pain control (95% CI 68.6, 92.2). Accuracy of attending and resident estimates of patient satisfaction did not differ significantly. The agreement between patient-reported and provider-estimated patient satisfaction was not associated with age, gender, patient disposition, or ED divert status. Conclusion: Providers are able to assess overall patient satisfaction and clarity of communication with a high accuracy. Physician estimates of pain control and perceived length of stay have a moderate accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872550700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872550700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6644

DO - 10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6644

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 351

EP - 357

JO - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 1936-900X

IS - 4

ER -