Hospitalizations for back and neck problems: A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State

Victoria M. Taylor, Geoffrey M. Anderson, Brad McNeney, Paula Diehr, John N. Lavis, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Claire Bombardier, Alex Malter, Tami Axcell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To examine back and neck hospitalizations in the Province of Ontario and Washington State. Because of their different organization and financing, there has been considerable interest in comparing healthcare systems in Canada and the United States. Features of healthcare systems might be expected to result in greater variations in care for elective than urgent conditions. Data Source. Automated hospital discharge databases. Study Design. Previously developed algorithms were used to identify surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations for back and neck problems in the administrative databases. We compared overall rates of hospitalization and lengths of hospital stay in Ontario and Washington as well as small area variations within the province and state. Principal Findings. Surgical back and neck hospitalizations were three times as common in Washington, but medical hospitalizations were twice as common in Ontario. Provincial lengths of stay were longer for both surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations. Admission rates varied substantially and significantly among small areas in both Washington and Ontario. Variations in hospital length of stay were greater in Ontario, particularly for nonsurgical back and neck hospitalizations. Conclusion. The two jurisdictions had very different patterns of hospital utilization for one of the most common health problems seen by physicians. Our results suggest that the global controls on hospital budgets and access to technology in Ontario were associated with lower rates of surgery, higher rates of hospital-based medical care, and longer lengths of stay. They also indicate that the utilization review process in Washington was associated with lower small area variation rates for medical back care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929-945
Number of pages17
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume33
Issue number4 I
StatePublished - Oct 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ontario
hospitalization
Hospitalization
Neck
Length of Stay
Small-Area Analysis
utilization
Utilization Review
Databases
Delivery of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
Budgets
Ambulatory Care
medical care
surgery
Canada
jurisdiction
budget
physician
Organizations

Keywords

  • Back and neck problems
  • Geographic variation
  • Healthcare systems
  • Hospitalization rates
  • Lengths of stay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Taylor, V. M., Anderson, G. M., McNeney, B., Diehr, P., Lavis, J. N., Deyo, R. R., ... Axcell, T. (1998). Hospitalizations for back and neck problems: A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State. Health Services Research, 33(4 I), 929-945.

Hospitalizations for back and neck problems : A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State. / Taylor, Victoria M.; Anderson, Geoffrey M.; McNeney, Brad; Diehr, Paula; Lavis, John N.; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Bombardier, Claire; Malter, Alex; Axcell, Tami.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 33, No. 4 I, 10.1998, p. 929-945.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor, VM, Anderson, GM, McNeney, B, Diehr, P, Lavis, JN, Deyo, RR, Bombardier, C, Malter, A & Axcell, T 1998, 'Hospitalizations for back and neck problems: A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State', Health Services Research, vol. 33, no. 4 I, pp. 929-945.
Taylor, Victoria M. ; Anderson, Geoffrey M. ; McNeney, Brad ; Diehr, Paula ; Lavis, John N. ; Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Bombardier, Claire ; Malter, Alex ; Axcell, Tami. / Hospitalizations for back and neck problems : A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State. In: Health Services Research. 1998 ; Vol. 33, No. 4 I. pp. 929-945.
@article{808ea86f520f4136831a3c389e044e0f,
title = "Hospitalizations for back and neck problems: A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State",
abstract = "Objective. To examine back and neck hospitalizations in the Province of Ontario and Washington State. Because of their different organization and financing, there has been considerable interest in comparing healthcare systems in Canada and the United States. Features of healthcare systems might be expected to result in greater variations in care for elective than urgent conditions. Data Source. Automated hospital discharge databases. Study Design. Previously developed algorithms were used to identify surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations for back and neck problems in the administrative databases. We compared overall rates of hospitalization and lengths of hospital stay in Ontario and Washington as well as small area variations within the province and state. Principal Findings. Surgical back and neck hospitalizations were three times as common in Washington, but medical hospitalizations were twice as common in Ontario. Provincial lengths of stay were longer for both surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations. Admission rates varied substantially and significantly among small areas in both Washington and Ontario. Variations in hospital length of stay were greater in Ontario, particularly for nonsurgical back and neck hospitalizations. Conclusion. The two jurisdictions had very different patterns of hospital utilization for one of the most common health problems seen by physicians. Our results suggest that the global controls on hospital budgets and access to technology in Ontario were associated with lower rates of surgery, higher rates of hospital-based medical care, and longer lengths of stay. They also indicate that the utilization review process in Washington was associated with lower small area variation rates for medical back care.",
keywords = "Back and neck problems, Geographic variation, Healthcare systems, Hospitalization rates, Lengths of stay",
author = "Taylor, {Victoria M.} and Anderson, {Geoffrey M.} and Brad McNeney and Paula Diehr and Lavis, {John N.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Claire Bombardier and Alex Malter and Tami Axcell",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "929--945",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospitalizations for back and neck problems

T2 - A comparison between the Province of Ontario and Washington State

AU - Taylor, Victoria M.

AU - Anderson, Geoffrey M.

AU - McNeney, Brad

AU - Diehr, Paula

AU - Lavis, John N.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Bombardier, Claire

AU - Malter, Alex

AU - Axcell, Tami

PY - 1998/10

Y1 - 1998/10

N2 - Objective. To examine back and neck hospitalizations in the Province of Ontario and Washington State. Because of their different organization and financing, there has been considerable interest in comparing healthcare systems in Canada and the United States. Features of healthcare systems might be expected to result in greater variations in care for elective than urgent conditions. Data Source. Automated hospital discharge databases. Study Design. Previously developed algorithms were used to identify surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations for back and neck problems in the administrative databases. We compared overall rates of hospitalization and lengths of hospital stay in Ontario and Washington as well as small area variations within the province and state. Principal Findings. Surgical back and neck hospitalizations were three times as common in Washington, but medical hospitalizations were twice as common in Ontario. Provincial lengths of stay were longer for both surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations. Admission rates varied substantially and significantly among small areas in both Washington and Ontario. Variations in hospital length of stay were greater in Ontario, particularly for nonsurgical back and neck hospitalizations. Conclusion. The two jurisdictions had very different patterns of hospital utilization for one of the most common health problems seen by physicians. Our results suggest that the global controls on hospital budgets and access to technology in Ontario were associated with lower rates of surgery, higher rates of hospital-based medical care, and longer lengths of stay. They also indicate that the utilization review process in Washington was associated with lower small area variation rates for medical back care.

AB - Objective. To examine back and neck hospitalizations in the Province of Ontario and Washington State. Because of their different organization and financing, there has been considerable interest in comparing healthcare systems in Canada and the United States. Features of healthcare systems might be expected to result in greater variations in care for elective than urgent conditions. Data Source. Automated hospital discharge databases. Study Design. Previously developed algorithms were used to identify surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations for back and neck problems in the administrative databases. We compared overall rates of hospitalization and lengths of hospital stay in Ontario and Washington as well as small area variations within the province and state. Principal Findings. Surgical back and neck hospitalizations were three times as common in Washington, but medical hospitalizations were twice as common in Ontario. Provincial lengths of stay were longer for both surgical and nonsurgical hospitalizations. Admission rates varied substantially and significantly among small areas in both Washington and Ontario. Variations in hospital length of stay were greater in Ontario, particularly for nonsurgical back and neck hospitalizations. Conclusion. The two jurisdictions had very different patterns of hospital utilization for one of the most common health problems seen by physicians. Our results suggest that the global controls on hospital budgets and access to technology in Ontario were associated with lower rates of surgery, higher rates of hospital-based medical care, and longer lengths of stay. They also indicate that the utilization review process in Washington was associated with lower small area variation rates for medical back care.

KW - Back and neck problems

KW - Geographic variation

KW - Healthcare systems

KW - Hospitalization rates

KW - Lengths of stay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031728778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031728778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9776943

AN - SCOPUS:0031728778

VL - 33

SP - 929

EP - 945

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 4 I

ER -