Hospice Care for Patients with Dementia

Does Volume Make a Difference?

Susan C. Miller, Dan K. Kiely, Joan Teno, Stephen R. Connor, Susan L. Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using the repository of 2005 Family Evaluation of Hospice Care data, this study examined whether bereaved family members report higher quality of care when hospices care for greater vs. lesser proportions of dementia patients. This organization-level analysis included 396 hospices meeting the study's eligibility criteria. Using hospice percentages of the "proportion of decedents with dementia," categories representing the lower three, the fourth and highest quintile values were created (i.e., <13%, ≥13%-19%, and ≥19%). Analyses were stratified by for-profit vs. not-for-profit because preliminary analyses showed differential associations by profit status. In for-profit hospices, hospices with the highest vs. lowest proportion of dementia patients (≥19% vs. <13%) had significantly lower unmet pain needs (-1.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.1%, -0.2%). However, for both profit groups, caring for ≥19% dementia decedents (vs. <13%) was associated with a lower proportion of "excellent" care ratings (-2.3%, 95% CI -4.5%, -0.2%). Statistically significant associations between higher volume and better ratings were not observed for the remaining (six) outcomes, although this trend was found more among for-profit hospices. Thus, profit status appears to modify the association between volume of dementia care and care ratings. Further study is needed to understand the nonintuitive negative association between higher volume and lower satisfaction. This study emphasizes the need for examination of quality outcomes by profit status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-291
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospice Care
Hospices
Dementia
Confidence Intervals
Quality of Health Care
Organizations
Pain

Keywords

  • dementia
  • Hospice
  • outcomes
  • profit status
  • survey
  • volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Hospice Care for Patients with Dementia : Does Volume Make a Difference? / Miller, Susan C.; Kiely, Dan K.; Teno, Joan; Connor, Stephen R.; Mitchell, Susan L.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, 01.03.2008, p. 283-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, Susan C. ; Kiely, Dan K. ; Teno, Joan ; Connor, Stephen R. ; Mitchell, Susan L. / Hospice Care for Patients with Dementia : Does Volume Make a Difference?. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2008 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 283-291.
@article{4dd2e7e5cf4b48db9c4ce4fc15f7cc04,
title = "Hospice Care for Patients with Dementia: Does Volume Make a Difference?",
abstract = "Using the repository of 2005 Family Evaluation of Hospice Care data, this study examined whether bereaved family members report higher quality of care when hospices care for greater vs. lesser proportions of dementia patients. This organization-level analysis included 396 hospices meeting the study's eligibility criteria. Using hospice percentages of the {"}proportion of decedents with dementia,{"} categories representing the lower three, the fourth and highest quintile values were created (i.e., <13{\%}, ≥13{\%}-19{\%}, and ≥19{\%}). Analyses were stratified by for-profit vs. not-for-profit because preliminary analyses showed differential associations by profit status. In for-profit hospices, hospices with the highest vs. lowest proportion of dementia patients (≥19{\%} vs. <13{\%}) had significantly lower unmet pain needs (-1.7{\%}, 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] -3.1{\%}, -0.2{\%}). However, for both profit groups, caring for ≥19{\%} dementia decedents (vs. <13{\%}) was associated with a lower proportion of {"}excellent{"} care ratings (-2.3{\%}, 95{\%} CI -4.5{\%}, -0.2{\%}). Statistically significant associations between higher volume and better ratings were not observed for the remaining (six) outcomes, although this trend was found more among for-profit hospices. Thus, profit status appears to modify the association between volume of dementia care and care ratings. Further study is needed to understand the nonintuitive negative association between higher volume and lower satisfaction. This study emphasizes the need for examination of quality outcomes by profit status.",
keywords = "dementia, Hospice, outcomes, profit status, survey, volume",
author = "Miller, {Susan C.} and Kiely, {Dan K.} and Joan Teno and Connor, {Stephen R.} and Mitchell, {Susan L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "283--291",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospice Care for Patients with Dementia

T2 - Does Volume Make a Difference?

AU - Miller, Susan C.

AU - Kiely, Dan K.

AU - Teno, Joan

AU - Connor, Stephen R.

AU - Mitchell, Susan L.

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Using the repository of 2005 Family Evaluation of Hospice Care data, this study examined whether bereaved family members report higher quality of care when hospices care for greater vs. lesser proportions of dementia patients. This organization-level analysis included 396 hospices meeting the study's eligibility criteria. Using hospice percentages of the "proportion of decedents with dementia," categories representing the lower three, the fourth and highest quintile values were created (i.e., <13%, ≥13%-19%, and ≥19%). Analyses were stratified by for-profit vs. not-for-profit because preliminary analyses showed differential associations by profit status. In for-profit hospices, hospices with the highest vs. lowest proportion of dementia patients (≥19% vs. <13%) had significantly lower unmet pain needs (-1.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.1%, -0.2%). However, for both profit groups, caring for ≥19% dementia decedents (vs. <13%) was associated with a lower proportion of "excellent" care ratings (-2.3%, 95% CI -4.5%, -0.2%). Statistically significant associations between higher volume and better ratings were not observed for the remaining (six) outcomes, although this trend was found more among for-profit hospices. Thus, profit status appears to modify the association between volume of dementia care and care ratings. Further study is needed to understand the nonintuitive negative association between higher volume and lower satisfaction. This study emphasizes the need for examination of quality outcomes by profit status.

AB - Using the repository of 2005 Family Evaluation of Hospice Care data, this study examined whether bereaved family members report higher quality of care when hospices care for greater vs. lesser proportions of dementia patients. This organization-level analysis included 396 hospices meeting the study's eligibility criteria. Using hospice percentages of the "proportion of decedents with dementia," categories representing the lower three, the fourth and highest quintile values were created (i.e., <13%, ≥13%-19%, and ≥19%). Analyses were stratified by for-profit vs. not-for-profit because preliminary analyses showed differential associations by profit status. In for-profit hospices, hospices with the highest vs. lowest proportion of dementia patients (≥19% vs. <13%) had significantly lower unmet pain needs (-1.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.1%, -0.2%). However, for both profit groups, caring for ≥19% dementia decedents (vs. <13%) was associated with a lower proportion of "excellent" care ratings (-2.3%, 95% CI -4.5%, -0.2%). Statistically significant associations between higher volume and better ratings were not observed for the remaining (six) outcomes, although this trend was found more among for-profit hospices. Thus, profit status appears to modify the association between volume of dementia care and care ratings. Further study is needed to understand the nonintuitive negative association between higher volume and lower satisfaction. This study emphasizes the need for examination of quality outcomes by profit status.

KW - dementia

KW - Hospice

KW - outcomes

KW - profit status

KW - survey

KW - volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39649085836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39649085836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 283

EP - 291

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 3

ER -