Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques

J. Craig Baumgartner, Howard Martin, Clyde L. Sabala, Edward J. Strittmatter, William L. Wildey, Nicholas C. Quigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Numerous methods of root canal preparation have been recommended and used by clinicians. This study used histomorphometrics to determine the area of root canal preparations using four currently popular techniques. Clinicians that were highly skilled in each technique prepared curved canals in acrylic blocks. Each clinician described this technique and discussed the technique with regard to the use of acrylic blocks as compared with dentin. Analysis of the areas of the root canals after preparation revealed a significant difference among the groups. The mean areas after treatment were step-back technique, 17.33 mm2; Cavi-Endo technique, 15.87 mm2; Canal Master technique, 13.56 mm2; and balanced force technique, 17.31 mm2. Photographs of the blocks used in the study were included for inspection by the reader.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)530-534
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of endodontics
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1992

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Baumgartner, J. C., Martin, H., Sabala, C. L., Strittmatter, E. J., Wildey, W. L., & Quigley, N. C. (1992). Histomorphometric comparison of canals prepared by four techniques. Journal of endodontics, 18(11), 530-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81208-2