Hemodynamic effects of the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a hemorrhagic swine model

Jason M. Rall, James Ross, Michael S. Clemens, Jennifer M. Cox, Theresea A. Buckley, Jonathan J. Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Torso hemorrhage constitutes a leading cause of battlefield mortality. The Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) uses a pneumatic bladder to compress the aorta reducing pelvic and lower extremity perfusion; however, concern exists over the risk of caval compression exacerbating hypotension after application. Methods Male swine (70-90 kg) were randomized into four groups of 10: presence or absence of hemorrhage and AAJT placement. After a 40% hemorrhage, a 15-min period of hypovolemia was observed before the AAJT application. All animals received two 500 mL boluses of Hextend separated by 30 min. Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and oxygenation values were compared among groups. Results The AAJT was effective in reducing blood flow to the femoral arteries in both hemorrhaged and nonhemorrhaged animals (P < 0.001 for both groups). Hemorrhage resulted in significant decrease in mean arterial pressure compared with sham controls (23.5 ± 2.4 versus 61.6 ± 7.8 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.001). AAJT application, compared with untreated controls, resulted in a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance but not in cardiac output, oxygenation, and central venous pressure. Furthermore, no indication of overresuscitation injury was present as evidenced by pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary histology. Conclusions AAJT application in an animal model of severe shock results in a favorable hemodynamic profile because of afterload support. The present study did not demonstrate any adverse consequences because of caval compression, bowel injury, or pulmonary dysfunction. In addition, there does not appear to be any particular intravenous fluid economy achieved by AAJT application.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-166
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume212
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2017

Fingerprint

Tourniquets
Swine
Hemodynamics
Hemorrhage
Venae Cavae
Arterial Pressure
Torso
Lung
Hypovolemia
Central Venous Pressure
Lung Injury
Femoral Artery
Cardiac Output
Vascular Resistance
Hypotension
Pulmonary Artery
Aorta
Lower Extremity
Shock
Histology

Keywords

  • Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquet
  • Hemorrhage control
  • Swine
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Hemodynamic effects of the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a hemorrhagic swine model. / Rall, Jason M.; Ross, James; Clemens, Michael S.; Cox, Jennifer M.; Buckley, Theresea A.; Morrison, Jonathan J.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 212, 15.05.2017, p. 159-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rall, Jason M. ; Ross, James ; Clemens, Michael S. ; Cox, Jennifer M. ; Buckley, Theresea A. ; Morrison, Jonathan J. / Hemodynamic effects of the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a hemorrhagic swine model. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2017 ; Vol. 212. pp. 159-166.
@article{d17833f13c6e42a2b208c6cf666c1961,
title = "Hemodynamic effects of the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a hemorrhagic swine model",
abstract = "Background Torso hemorrhage constitutes a leading cause of battlefield mortality. The Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) uses a pneumatic bladder to compress the aorta reducing pelvic and lower extremity perfusion; however, concern exists over the risk of caval compression exacerbating hypotension after application. Methods Male swine (70-90 kg) were randomized into four groups of 10: presence or absence of hemorrhage and AAJT placement. After a 40{\%} hemorrhage, a 15-min period of hypovolemia was observed before the AAJT application. All animals received two 500 mL boluses of Hextend separated by 30 min. Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and oxygenation values were compared among groups. Results The AAJT was effective in reducing blood flow to the femoral arteries in both hemorrhaged and nonhemorrhaged animals (P < 0.001 for both groups). Hemorrhage resulted in significant decrease in mean arterial pressure compared with sham controls (23.5 ± 2.4 versus 61.6 ± 7.8 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.001). AAJT application, compared with untreated controls, resulted in a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance but not in cardiac output, oxygenation, and central venous pressure. Furthermore, no indication of overresuscitation injury was present as evidenced by pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary histology. Conclusions AAJT application in an animal model of severe shock results in a favorable hemodynamic profile because of afterload support. The present study did not demonstrate any adverse consequences because of caval compression, bowel injury, or pulmonary dysfunction. In addition, there does not appear to be any particular intravenous fluid economy achieved by AAJT application.",
keywords = "Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquet, Hemorrhage control, Swine, Trauma",
author = "Rall, {Jason M.} and James Ross and Clemens, {Michael S.} and Cox, {Jennifer M.} and Buckley, {Theresea A.} and Morrison, {Jonathan J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "212",
pages = "159--166",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hemodynamic effects of the Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet in a hemorrhagic swine model

AU - Rall, Jason M.

AU - Ross, James

AU - Clemens, Michael S.

AU - Cox, Jennifer M.

AU - Buckley, Theresea A.

AU - Morrison, Jonathan J.

PY - 2017/5/15

Y1 - 2017/5/15

N2 - Background Torso hemorrhage constitutes a leading cause of battlefield mortality. The Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) uses a pneumatic bladder to compress the aorta reducing pelvic and lower extremity perfusion; however, concern exists over the risk of caval compression exacerbating hypotension after application. Methods Male swine (70-90 kg) were randomized into four groups of 10: presence or absence of hemorrhage and AAJT placement. After a 40% hemorrhage, a 15-min period of hypovolemia was observed before the AAJT application. All animals received two 500 mL boluses of Hextend separated by 30 min. Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and oxygenation values were compared among groups. Results The AAJT was effective in reducing blood flow to the femoral arteries in both hemorrhaged and nonhemorrhaged animals (P < 0.001 for both groups). Hemorrhage resulted in significant decrease in mean arterial pressure compared with sham controls (23.5 ± 2.4 versus 61.6 ± 7.8 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.001). AAJT application, compared with untreated controls, resulted in a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance but not in cardiac output, oxygenation, and central venous pressure. Furthermore, no indication of overresuscitation injury was present as evidenced by pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary histology. Conclusions AAJT application in an animal model of severe shock results in a favorable hemodynamic profile because of afterload support. The present study did not demonstrate any adverse consequences because of caval compression, bowel injury, or pulmonary dysfunction. In addition, there does not appear to be any particular intravenous fluid economy achieved by AAJT application.

AB - Background Torso hemorrhage constitutes a leading cause of battlefield mortality. The Abdominal Aortic and Junctional Tourniquet (AAJT) uses a pneumatic bladder to compress the aorta reducing pelvic and lower extremity perfusion; however, concern exists over the risk of caval compression exacerbating hypotension after application. Methods Male swine (70-90 kg) were randomized into four groups of 10: presence or absence of hemorrhage and AAJT placement. After a 40% hemorrhage, a 15-min period of hypovolemia was observed before the AAJT application. All animals received two 500 mL boluses of Hextend separated by 30 min. Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and oxygenation values were compared among groups. Results The AAJT was effective in reducing blood flow to the femoral arteries in both hemorrhaged and nonhemorrhaged animals (P < 0.001 for both groups). Hemorrhage resulted in significant decrease in mean arterial pressure compared with sham controls (23.5 ± 2.4 versus 61.6 ± 7.8 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.001). AAJT application, compared with untreated controls, resulted in a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance but not in cardiac output, oxygenation, and central venous pressure. Furthermore, no indication of overresuscitation injury was present as evidenced by pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary histology. Conclusions AAJT application in an animal model of severe shock results in a favorable hemodynamic profile because of afterload support. The present study did not demonstrate any adverse consequences because of caval compression, bowel injury, or pulmonary dysfunction. In addition, there does not appear to be any particular intravenous fluid economy achieved by AAJT application.

KW - Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquet

KW - Hemorrhage control

KW - Swine

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013659114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013659114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.020

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 28550903

AN - SCOPUS:85013659114

VL - 212

SP - 159

EP - 166

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

ER -