Health-related quality of life: A guide for the health professional

Upasana Nanda, Elena Andresen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The importance of evaluating health care in terms of patients' quality of life has only recently been acknowledged in the context of outcomes research and the measurement of quality of care. As a health professional, trying to choose the appropriate health status or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure can be daunting, as one is faced with a bewildering array of choices. The purpose of this article is to describe the process by which professionals might make a choice about measures in outcomes research. The article includes examples and rationale for using generic or disease- specific HRQOL measures. In addition, examples are provided of HRQOL assessment in two adult chronic disease applications: asthma and congestive heart failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-215
Number of pages37
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

health professionals
quality of life
Quality of Life
Health
health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Disease
Quality of Health Care
Health Status
health status
Chronic Disease
Asthma
Heart Failure
health care
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Health-related quality of life : A guide for the health professional. / Nanda, Upasana; Andresen, Elena.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, p. 179-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{adf3c69ff56c437f8a157d6d4aa1187e,
title = "Health-related quality of life: A guide for the health professional",
abstract = "The importance of evaluating health care in terms of patients' quality of life has only recently been acknowledged in the context of outcomes research and the measurement of quality of care. As a health professional, trying to choose the appropriate health status or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure can be daunting, as one is faced with a bewildering array of choices. The purpose of this article is to describe the process by which professionals might make a choice about measures in outcomes research. The article includes examples and rationale for using generic or disease- specific HRQOL measures. In addition, examples are provided of HRQOL assessment in two adult chronic disease applications: asthma and congestive heart failure.",
author = "Upasana Nanda and Elena Andresen",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1177/016327879802100204",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "179--215",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health-related quality of life

T2 - A guide for the health professional

AU - Nanda, Upasana

AU - Andresen, Elena

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The importance of evaluating health care in terms of patients' quality of life has only recently been acknowledged in the context of outcomes research and the measurement of quality of care. As a health professional, trying to choose the appropriate health status or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure can be daunting, as one is faced with a bewildering array of choices. The purpose of this article is to describe the process by which professionals might make a choice about measures in outcomes research. The article includes examples and rationale for using generic or disease- specific HRQOL measures. In addition, examples are provided of HRQOL assessment in two adult chronic disease applications: asthma and congestive heart failure.

AB - The importance of evaluating health care in terms of patients' quality of life has only recently been acknowledged in the context of outcomes research and the measurement of quality of care. As a health professional, trying to choose the appropriate health status or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure can be daunting, as one is faced with a bewildering array of choices. The purpose of this article is to describe the process by which professionals might make a choice about measures in outcomes research. The article includes examples and rationale for using generic or disease- specific HRQOL measures. In addition, examples are provided of HRQOL assessment in two adult chronic disease applications: asthma and congestive heart failure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031959640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031959640&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/016327879802100204

DO - 10.1177/016327879802100204

M3 - Article

C2 - 10183344

AN - SCOPUS:0031959640

VL - 21

SP - 179

EP - 215

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 2

ER -