Health professionals' views on standards for decision-making capacity regarding refusal of medical treatment in mild Alzheimer's disease

Ladislav Volicer, Linda Ganzini

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    21 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This study was designed to determine which elements professionals consider important for evaluation of decision-making capacity. Survey with a vignette case report of an individual with mild dementia was mailed to four groups of individuals: 1. members of the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, 2. chairs of Veterans Affairs (VA) Ethics Advisory Committees (EACs), 3. randomly selected geriatricians who were members of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), and 4. randomly selected psychologists who were members of the GSA. Two hundred thirty-seven psychiatrists, 95 VA EAC chairs, 103 geriatricians, and 46 psychologists responded to this survey. The majority of the respondents endorsed all five basic elements as necessary for determination of decision-making capacity in the presented vignette, but only a minority of respondents endorsed all five basic elements, and a small proportion of respondents endorsed only one or two elements. The results indicate that physicians do not use uniform standards for assessment of decision-making capacity.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1270-1274
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
    Volume51
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 1 2003

    Keywords

    • Decision-making capacity
    • Dementia
    • Ethical standards

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geriatrics and Gerontology

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Health professionals' views on standards for decision-making capacity regarding refusal of medical treatment in mild Alzheimer's disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this