Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV

Katharine Simmons, Lauren Zapata, Kathryn M. Curtis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Women who are living with HIV use IUDs at a lower rate than the general population, and it is unclear whether health care providers’ misconceptions about IUD safety contribute to this disparity. METHODS: A 2013–2014 nationwide survey of 1,998 U.S. family planning providers assessed perceptions of IUD safety for women with HIV or other medical conditions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between provider characteristics and whether individuals believed IUDs were safe for HIV-positive women. Data from public-sector providers and office-based physicians were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Seven in 10 providers considered IUDs safe for women with HIV, and there were no differences by provider type. Among public-sector providers, some of the characteristics associated with believing that IUDs were unsafe for seropositive women were working at a clinic without Title X funding (odds ratio, 1.5), not being trained in IUD insertion (2.1) and not using the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) for clinical guidance (1.8). Office-based physicians who did not use the guidelines also had an increased likelihood of believing that IUDs were unsafe for women with HIV (2.9), and physicians who had completed training 25 or more years ago were more likely than those who had done so less than five years ago to consider IUDs unsafe (3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Greater use of evidence-based contraceptive guidance such as the U.S. MEC may help inform provider perceptions of IUD safety and hence contribute to increased contraceptive choice for women with HIV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-73
Number of pages7
JournalPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Personnel
HIV
health care
Safety
Contraceptive Agents
contraceptive
Physicians' Offices
Public Sector
physician
public sector
Working Women
working woman
Family Planning Services
family planning
Logistic Models
funding
logistics
Odds Ratio
Guidelines
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV. / Simmons, Katharine; Zapata, Lauren; Curtis, Kathryn M.

In: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol. 50, No. 2, 01.06.2018, p. 67-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simmons, Katharine ; Zapata, Lauren ; Curtis, Kathryn M. / Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV. In: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2018 ; Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 67-73.
@article{67783eb1b8164700baa6bc5bf96037e2,
title = "Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Women who are living with HIV use IUDs at a lower rate than the general population, and it is unclear whether health care providers’ misconceptions about IUD safety contribute to this disparity. METHODS: A 2013–2014 nationwide survey of 1,998 U.S. family planning providers assessed perceptions of IUD safety for women with HIV or other medical conditions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between provider characteristics and whether individuals believed IUDs were safe for HIV-positive women. Data from public-sector providers and office-based physicians were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Seven in 10 providers considered IUDs safe for women with HIV, and there were no differences by provider type. Among public-sector providers, some of the characteristics associated with believing that IUDs were unsafe for seropositive women were working at a clinic without Title X funding (odds ratio, 1.5), not being trained in IUD insertion (2.1) and not using the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) for clinical guidance (1.8). Office-based physicians who did not use the guidelines also had an increased likelihood of believing that IUDs were unsafe for women with HIV (2.9), and physicians who had completed training 25 or more years ago were more likely than those who had done so less than five years ago to consider IUDs unsafe (3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Greater use of evidence-based contraceptive guidance such as the U.S. MEC may help inform provider perceptions of IUD safety and hence contribute to increased contraceptive choice for women with HIV.",
author = "Katharine Simmons and Lauren Zapata and Curtis, {Kathryn M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1363/psrh.12056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "67--73",
journal = "Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "1538-6341",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health Care Provider Perceptions of the Safety of IUDs for Women with HIV

AU - Simmons, Katharine

AU - Zapata, Lauren

AU - Curtis, Kathryn M.

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - CONTEXT: Women who are living with HIV use IUDs at a lower rate than the general population, and it is unclear whether health care providers’ misconceptions about IUD safety contribute to this disparity. METHODS: A 2013–2014 nationwide survey of 1,998 U.S. family planning providers assessed perceptions of IUD safety for women with HIV or other medical conditions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between provider characteristics and whether individuals believed IUDs were safe for HIV-positive women. Data from public-sector providers and office-based physicians were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Seven in 10 providers considered IUDs safe for women with HIV, and there were no differences by provider type. Among public-sector providers, some of the characteristics associated with believing that IUDs were unsafe for seropositive women were working at a clinic without Title X funding (odds ratio, 1.5), not being trained in IUD insertion (2.1) and not using the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) for clinical guidance (1.8). Office-based physicians who did not use the guidelines also had an increased likelihood of believing that IUDs were unsafe for women with HIV (2.9), and physicians who had completed training 25 or more years ago were more likely than those who had done so less than five years ago to consider IUDs unsafe (3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Greater use of evidence-based contraceptive guidance such as the U.S. MEC may help inform provider perceptions of IUD safety and hence contribute to increased contraceptive choice for women with HIV.

AB - CONTEXT: Women who are living with HIV use IUDs at a lower rate than the general population, and it is unclear whether health care providers’ misconceptions about IUD safety contribute to this disparity. METHODS: A 2013–2014 nationwide survey of 1,998 U.S. family planning providers assessed perceptions of IUD safety for women with HIV or other medical conditions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between provider characteristics and whether individuals believed IUDs were safe for HIV-positive women. Data from public-sector providers and office-based physicians were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Seven in 10 providers considered IUDs safe for women with HIV, and there were no differences by provider type. Among public-sector providers, some of the characteristics associated with believing that IUDs were unsafe for seropositive women were working at a clinic without Title X funding (odds ratio, 1.5), not being trained in IUD insertion (2.1) and not using the U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) for clinical guidance (1.8). Office-based physicians who did not use the guidelines also had an increased likelihood of believing that IUDs were unsafe for women with HIV (2.9), and physicians who had completed training 25 or more years ago were more likely than those who had done so less than five years ago to consider IUDs unsafe (3.3). CONCLUSIONS: Greater use of evidence-based contraceptive guidance such as the U.S. MEC may help inform provider perceptions of IUD safety and hence contribute to increased contraceptive choice for women with HIV.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048699777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048699777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1363/psrh.12056

DO - 10.1363/psrh.12056

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 67

EP - 73

JO - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 1538-6341

IS - 2

ER -