Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Patterns of Practice Variability Identified as a Challenge to Real-World Big Data: Results From the Learning from Analysis of Multicentre Big Data Aggregation (LAMBDA) Consortium

Amanda Caissie, Michelle Mierzwa, Clifton David Fuller, Murali Rajaraman, Alex Lin, Andrew MacDonald, Richard Popple, Ying Xiao, Lisanne VanDijk, Peter Balter, Helen Fong, Heping Xu, Matthew Kovoor, Joonsang Lee, Arvind Rao, Mary Martel, Reid Thompson, Brandon Merz, John Yao, Charles Mayo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Outside of randomized clinical trials, it is difficult to develop clinically relevant evidence-based recommendations for radiation therapy (RT) practice guidelines owing to lack of comprehensive real-world data. To address this knowledge gap, we formed the Learning from Analysis of Multicenter Big Data Aggregation consortium to cooperatively implement RT data standardization, develop software solutions for data analysis, and recommend clinical practice change based on real-world data analyzed. The first phase of this “Big Data” study aimed at characterizing variability in clinical practice patterns of dosimetric data for organs at risk (OARs) that would undermine subsequent use of large-scale, electronically aggregated data to characterize associations with outcomes. Evidence from this study was used as the basis for practical recommendations to improve data quality. Methods and Materials: Dosimetric details of patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed. Institutional patterns of practice were characterized, including structure nomenclature, volumes, and frequency of contouring. Dose volume histogram (DVH) distributions were characterized and compared with institutional constraints and literature values. Results: Plans for 4664 patients treated to a mean plan dose of 64.4 ± 13.2 Gy in 32 ± 4 fractions were aggregated. Before implementation of TG-263 guidelines in each institution, there was variability in OAR nomenclature across institutions and structures. With evidence from this study, we identified a targeted and practical set of recommendations aimed at improving the quality of real-world data. Conclusions: Quantifying similarities and differences among institutions for OAR structures and DVH metrics is the launching point for next steps to investigate potential relationships between DVH parameters and patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100925
JournalAdvances in Radiation Oncology
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Head and Neck Radiation Therapy Patterns of Practice Variability Identified as a Challenge to Real-World Big Data: Results From the Learning from Analysis of Multicentre Big Data Aggregation (LAMBDA) Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this