Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy

A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society

Sidney J. Winawer, Ann G. Zauber, Robert H. Fletcher, Jonathon S. Stillman, Michael J. O'Brien, Bernard Levin, Robert A. Smith, David Lieberman, Randall W. Burt, Theodore R. Levin, John H. Bond, Durado Brooks, Tim Byers, Neil Hyman, Lynne Kirk, Alan Thorson, Clifford Simmang, David Johnson, Douglas K. Rex

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

571 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which showed clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance take place 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003 these guidelines were updated and colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, stratification at baseline into low risk and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was designed to address all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be stratified more definitely at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower risk or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either 3 or more adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or an adenoma 1 cm or larger in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have 1 or 2 small (

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1872-1885
Number of pages14
JournalGastroenterology
Volume130
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Colonoscopy
Adenoma
Colorectal Neoplasms
Guidelines
Adenomatous Polyps
Polyps
Neoplasms
Pathology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy : A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. / Winawer, Sidney J.; Zauber, Ann G.; Fletcher, Robert H.; Stillman, Jonathon S.; O'Brien, Michael J.; Levin, Bernard; Smith, Robert A.; Lieberman, David; Burt, Randall W.; Levin, Theodore R.; Bond, John H.; Brooks, Durado; Byers, Tim; Hyman, Neil; Kirk, Lynne; Thorson, Alan; Simmang, Clifford; Johnson, David; Rex, Douglas K.

In: Gastroenterology, Vol. 130, No. 6, 06.2006, p. 1872-1885.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winawer, SJ, Zauber, AG, Fletcher, RH, Stillman, JS, O'Brien, MJ, Levin, B, Smith, RA, Lieberman, D, Burt, RW, Levin, TR, Bond, JH, Brooks, D, Byers, T, Hyman, N, Kirk, L, Thorson, A, Simmang, C, Johnson, D & Rex, DK 2006, 'Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society', Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 1872-1885. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012
Winawer, Sidney J. ; Zauber, Ann G. ; Fletcher, Robert H. ; Stillman, Jonathon S. ; O'Brien, Michael J. ; Levin, Bernard ; Smith, Robert A. ; Lieberman, David ; Burt, Randall W. ; Levin, Theodore R. ; Bond, John H. ; Brooks, Durado ; Byers, Tim ; Hyman, Neil ; Kirk, Lynne ; Thorson, Alan ; Simmang, Clifford ; Johnson, David ; Rex, Douglas K. / Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy : A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. In: Gastroenterology. 2006 ; Vol. 130, No. 6. pp. 1872-1885.
@article{ba6a71f727df449a9ee3bdc18488960b,
title = "Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society",
abstract = "Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which showed clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance take place 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003 these guidelines were updated and colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, stratification at baseline into low risk and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was designed to address all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be stratified more definitely at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower risk or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either 3 or more adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or an adenoma 1 cm or larger in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have 1 or 2 small (",
author = "Winawer, {Sidney J.} and Zauber, {Ann G.} and Fletcher, {Robert H.} and Stillman, {Jonathon S.} and O'Brien, {Michael J.} and Bernard Levin and Smith, {Robert A.} and David Lieberman and Burt, {Randall W.} and Levin, {Theodore R.} and Bond, {John H.} and Durado Brooks and Tim Byers and Neil Hyman and Lynne Kirk and Alan Thorson and Clifford Simmang and David Johnson and Rex, {Douglas K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "130",
pages = "1872--1885",
journal = "Gastroenterology",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Polypectomy

T2 - A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society

AU - Winawer, Sidney J.

AU - Zauber, Ann G.

AU - Fletcher, Robert H.

AU - Stillman, Jonathon S.

AU - O'Brien, Michael J.

AU - Levin, Bernard

AU - Smith, Robert A.

AU - Lieberman, David

AU - Burt, Randall W.

AU - Levin, Theodore R.

AU - Bond, John H.

AU - Brooks, Durado

AU - Byers, Tim

AU - Hyman, Neil

AU - Kirk, Lynne

AU - Thorson, Alan

AU - Simmang, Clifford

AU - Johnson, David

AU - Rex, Douglas K.

PY - 2006/6

Y1 - 2006/6

N2 - Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which showed clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance take place 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003 these guidelines were updated and colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, stratification at baseline into low risk and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was designed to address all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be stratified more definitely at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower risk or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either 3 or more adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or an adenoma 1 cm or larger in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have 1 or 2 small (

AB - Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which showed clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance take place 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003 these guidelines were updated and colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, stratification at baseline into low risk and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was designed to address all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be stratified more definitely at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower risk or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either 3 or more adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or an adenoma 1 cm or larger in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have 1 or 2 small (

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646361037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646361037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012

DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.012

M3 - Article

VL - 130

SP - 1872

EP - 1885

JO - Gastroenterology

JF - Gastroenterology

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 6

ER -