Getting performance metrics right: A qualitative study of staff experiences implementing and measuring practice transformation

Devan Kansagara, Anaïs Tuepker, Sandy Joos, Christina Nicolaidis, Eleni Skaperdas, David Hickam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement is a central goal of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, and requires the use of relevant performance measures that can effectively guide comprehensive care improvements. Existing literature suggests performance measurement can lead to improvements in care quality, but may also promote practices that are detrimental to patient care. Staff perceptions of performance metric implementation have not been well-researched in medical home settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care staff (clinicians and other staff) experiences with the use of performance metrics during the implementation of the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) model of care. DESIGN: Observational qualitative study; data collection using role-stratified focus groups and semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-one of 337 (72 %) identified primary care clinic staff in PACT team and clinic administrative/other roles, from 15 VHA clinics in Oregon and Washington. APPROACH: Data coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis techniques. KEY RESULTS: Primary care staff perceived that performance metrics: 1) led to delivery changes that were not always aligned with PACT principles, 2) did not accurately reflect patient-priorities, 3) represented an opportunity cost, 4) were imposed with little communication or transparency, and 5) were not well-adapted to team-based care. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care staff perceived responding to performance metrics as time-consuming and not consistently aligned with PACT principles of care. The gaps between the theory and reality of performance metric implementation highlighted by PACT team members are important to consider as the medical home model is more widely implemented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume29
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Care Team
Patient-Centered Care
Primary Health Care
Veterans Health
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Focus Groups
Observational Studies
Patient Care
Communication
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • focus groups
  • patient-centered medical home
  • performance metrics
  • primary care
  • qualitative research
  • team-based care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Getting performance metrics right : A qualitative study of staff experiences implementing and measuring practice transformation. / Kansagara, Devan; Tuepker, Anaïs; Joos, Sandy; Nicolaidis, Christina; Skaperdas, Eleni; Hickam, David.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 29, No. SUPPL. 2, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kansagara, Devan ; Tuepker, Anaïs ; Joos, Sandy ; Nicolaidis, Christina ; Skaperdas, Eleni ; Hickam, David. / Getting performance metrics right : A qualitative study of staff experiences implementing and measuring practice transformation. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. SUPPL. 2.
@article{bb014d65a6154a539a42e6ac265f4899,
title = "Getting performance metrics right: A qualitative study of staff experiences implementing and measuring practice transformation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Quality improvement is a central goal of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, and requires the use of relevant performance measures that can effectively guide comprehensive care improvements. Existing literature suggests performance measurement can lead to improvements in care quality, but may also promote practices that are detrimental to patient care. Staff perceptions of performance metric implementation have not been well-researched in medical home settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care staff (clinicians and other staff) experiences with the use of performance metrics during the implementation of the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) model of care. DESIGN: Observational qualitative study; data collection using role-stratified focus groups and semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-one of 337 (72 {\%}) identified primary care clinic staff in PACT team and clinic administrative/other roles, from 15 VHA clinics in Oregon and Washington. APPROACH: Data coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis techniques. KEY RESULTS: Primary care staff perceived that performance metrics: 1) led to delivery changes that were not always aligned with PACT principles, 2) did not accurately reflect patient-priorities, 3) represented an opportunity cost, 4) were imposed with little communication or transparency, and 5) were not well-adapted to team-based care. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care staff perceived responding to performance metrics as time-consuming and not consistently aligned with PACT principles of care. The gaps between the theory and reality of performance metric implementation highlighted by PACT team members are important to consider as the medical home model is more widely implemented.",
keywords = "focus groups, patient-centered medical home, performance metrics, primary care, qualitative research, team-based care",
author = "Devan Kansagara and Ana{\"i}s Tuepker and Sandy Joos and Christina Nicolaidis and Eleni Skaperdas and David Hickam",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s11606-013-2764-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "SUPPL. 2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting performance metrics right

T2 - A qualitative study of staff experiences implementing and measuring practice transformation

AU - Kansagara, Devan

AU - Tuepker, Anaïs

AU - Joos, Sandy

AU - Nicolaidis, Christina

AU - Skaperdas, Eleni

AU - Hickam, David

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND: Quality improvement is a central goal of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, and requires the use of relevant performance measures that can effectively guide comprehensive care improvements. Existing literature suggests performance measurement can lead to improvements in care quality, but may also promote practices that are detrimental to patient care. Staff perceptions of performance metric implementation have not been well-researched in medical home settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care staff (clinicians and other staff) experiences with the use of performance metrics during the implementation of the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) model of care. DESIGN: Observational qualitative study; data collection using role-stratified focus groups and semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-one of 337 (72 %) identified primary care clinic staff in PACT team and clinic administrative/other roles, from 15 VHA clinics in Oregon and Washington. APPROACH: Data coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis techniques. KEY RESULTS: Primary care staff perceived that performance metrics: 1) led to delivery changes that were not always aligned with PACT principles, 2) did not accurately reflect patient-priorities, 3) represented an opportunity cost, 4) were imposed with little communication or transparency, and 5) were not well-adapted to team-based care. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care staff perceived responding to performance metrics as time-consuming and not consistently aligned with PACT principles of care. The gaps between the theory and reality of performance metric implementation highlighted by PACT team members are important to consider as the medical home model is more widely implemented.

AB - BACKGROUND: Quality improvement is a central goal of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model, and requires the use of relevant performance measures that can effectively guide comprehensive care improvements. Existing literature suggests performance measurement can lead to improvements in care quality, but may also promote practices that are detrimental to patient care. Staff perceptions of performance metric implementation have not been well-researched in medical home settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care staff (clinicians and other staff) experiences with the use of performance metrics during the implementation of the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) model of care. DESIGN: Observational qualitative study; data collection using role-stratified focus groups and semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and forty-one of 337 (72 %) identified primary care clinic staff in PACT team and clinic administrative/other roles, from 15 VHA clinics in Oregon and Washington. APPROACH: Data coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis techniques. KEY RESULTS: Primary care staff perceived that performance metrics: 1) led to delivery changes that were not always aligned with PACT principles, 2) did not accurately reflect patient-priorities, 3) represented an opportunity cost, 4) were imposed with little communication or transparency, and 5) were not well-adapted to team-based care. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care staff perceived responding to performance metrics as time-consuming and not consistently aligned with PACT principles of care. The gaps between the theory and reality of performance metric implementation highlighted by PACT team members are important to consider as the medical home model is more widely implemented.

KW - focus groups

KW - patient-centered medical home

KW - performance metrics

KW - primary care

KW - qualitative research

KW - team-based care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905099734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905099734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11606-013-2764-y

DO - 10.1007/s11606-013-2764-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 24557515

AN - SCOPUS:84905099734

VL - 29

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - SUPPL. 2

ER -