TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographic differences in the unpaid, caregiver experience from the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC)
AU - Rosenberg, Mara W.
AU - Eckstrom, Elizabeth
N1 - Funding Information:
National Study of Caregiving Study Round III and the associated National Health and Aging Trends Study Round 8, a survey based dataset collected in 2017. A linked Metro-Nonmetro Indicator file was used for this analysis to characterize rural versus urban residence. NHATS is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG32947) and was conducted by the Johns Hopkins University12,13.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Rural and Remote Health. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Introduction: The objective of this cross-sectional, descriptive study was to identify unpaid caregiver differences in demographics, competing work responsibilities, support, health, caregiver burden, and interaction with healthcare professionals in US metropolitan and non-metropolitan settings. Methods: This study leveraged the nationally representative survey of older adults and their unpaid caregivers residing in the USA: the 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving. Participants were unpaid caregivers for community-dwelling older adults. Results: A total of 2278 unique unpaid caregivers corresponding to 1431 care recipients were investigated for this study. Nonmetropolitan caregivers had significantly lower income than their metropolitan counterparts, were more likely to be married or have a partner, missed less work, and, when traveling to provide care, traveled on average fewer minutes than metropolitan caregivers. However, there were no significant differences in relationship to caregiver, impact on primary work responsibilities, financial assistance, resource utilization or access, caregiver burden, relationship with primary care providers, or self-rated caregiver health. Conclusion: Non-metropolitan caregivers experience lower income with possible greater familial support, but despite the financial disparities do not have higher caregiver burden, poorer self-rated health, or differences in other important measures. Additional studies that further divide the non-metropolitan cohort into more refined categories by population and with larger sample sizes are essential for designing policy and programs to learn from rural caregivers and build resilience among all care providers.
AB - Introduction: The objective of this cross-sectional, descriptive study was to identify unpaid caregiver differences in demographics, competing work responsibilities, support, health, caregiver burden, and interaction with healthcare professionals in US metropolitan and non-metropolitan settings. Methods: This study leveraged the nationally representative survey of older adults and their unpaid caregivers residing in the USA: the 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving. Participants were unpaid caregivers for community-dwelling older adults. Results: A total of 2278 unique unpaid caregivers corresponding to 1431 care recipients were investigated for this study. Nonmetropolitan caregivers had significantly lower income than their metropolitan counterparts, were more likely to be married or have a partner, missed less work, and, when traveling to provide care, traveled on average fewer minutes than metropolitan caregivers. However, there were no significant differences in relationship to caregiver, impact on primary work responsibilities, financial assistance, resource utilization or access, caregiver burden, relationship with primary care providers, or self-rated caregiver health. Conclusion: Non-metropolitan caregivers experience lower income with possible greater familial support, but despite the financial disparities do not have higher caregiver burden, poorer self-rated health, or differences in other important measures. Additional studies that further divide the non-metropolitan cohort into more refined categories by population and with larger sample sizes are essential for designing policy and programs to learn from rural caregivers and build resilience among all care providers.
KW - USA
KW - caregiver
KW - caregiver burden
KW - caregiver resilience
KW - older adult
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092885365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092885365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22605/RRH6062
DO - 10.22605/RRH6062
M3 - Article
C2 - 33050707
AN - SCOPUS:85092885365
SN - 1445-6354
VL - 20
JO - Rural and Remote Health
JF - Rural and Remote Health
IS - 4
ER -