Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life

Donald L. Patrick, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1301 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Application of generic and specific measures of health status and quality of life to different diseases, conditions, states, and populations is increasing. Four strategies for using these measures are separate generic and specific measures, modified generic measures, disease-specific supplements, and batteries. The preferred strategy depends on project aims, methodological concerns, and practical constraints. Generic measures are necessary to compare outcomes across different populations and interventions, particularly for cost-effectiveness studies. Disease-specific measures assess the special states and concerns of diagnostic groups. Specific measures may be more sensitive for the detection and quantification of small changes that are important to clinicians or patients. Comparison studies are needed of the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of generic and disease-specific measures in the same population and in minority and age-specific groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S217-S232
JournalMedical Care
Volume27
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Status
health status
quality of life
Quality of Life
Disease
Population
quantification
Reproducibility of Results
supplement
Cost-Benefit Analysis
diagnostic
Group
Age Groups
minority
costs

Keywords

  • Arthritis
  • Disability evaluation
  • Health status
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. / Patrick, Donald L.; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Medical Care, Vol. 27, No. 3, 1989, p. S217-S232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{472d7580e5f946369504bb95d06d2d57,
title = "Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life",
abstract = "Application of generic and specific measures of health status and quality of life to different diseases, conditions, states, and populations is increasing. Four strategies for using these measures are separate generic and specific measures, modified generic measures, disease-specific supplements, and batteries. The preferred strategy depends on project aims, methodological concerns, and practical constraints. Generic measures are necessary to compare outcomes across different populations and interventions, particularly for cost-effectiveness studies. Disease-specific measures assess the special states and concerns of diagnostic groups. Specific measures may be more sensitive for the detection and quantification of small changes that are important to clinicians or patients. Comparison studies are needed of the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of generic and disease-specific measures in the same population and in minority and age-specific groups.",
keywords = "Arthritis, Disability evaluation, Health status, Quality of life",
author = "Patrick, {Donald L.} and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "S217--S232",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life

AU - Patrick, Donald L.

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Application of generic and specific measures of health status and quality of life to different diseases, conditions, states, and populations is increasing. Four strategies for using these measures are separate generic and specific measures, modified generic measures, disease-specific supplements, and batteries. The preferred strategy depends on project aims, methodological concerns, and practical constraints. Generic measures are necessary to compare outcomes across different populations and interventions, particularly for cost-effectiveness studies. Disease-specific measures assess the special states and concerns of diagnostic groups. Specific measures may be more sensitive for the detection and quantification of small changes that are important to clinicians or patients. Comparison studies are needed of the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of generic and disease-specific measures in the same population and in minority and age-specific groups.

AB - Application of generic and specific measures of health status and quality of life to different diseases, conditions, states, and populations is increasing. Four strategies for using these measures are separate generic and specific measures, modified generic measures, disease-specific supplements, and batteries. The preferred strategy depends on project aims, methodological concerns, and practical constraints. Generic measures are necessary to compare outcomes across different populations and interventions, particularly for cost-effectiveness studies. Disease-specific measures assess the special states and concerns of diagnostic groups. Specific measures may be more sensitive for the detection and quantification of small changes that are important to clinicians or patients. Comparison studies are needed of the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of generic and disease-specific measures in the same population and in minority and age-specific groups.

KW - Arthritis

KW - Disability evaluation

KW - Health status

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024637480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024637480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2646490

AN - SCOPUS:0024637480

VL - 27

SP - S217-S232

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 3

ER -