Generation of consensus in the application of a rating scale to nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function

David D. Tieu, Mark E. Gerber, Henry Milczuk, Sanjay R. Parikh, Jonathan A. Perkins, Patricia J. Yoon, Kathleen C Y Sie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To generate consensus ratings of velopharyngeal function on nasendoscopy (NE) with the goal of creating a video instruction tool. Methods: The American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Study Group convened to identify NE segments to be included in an instructional video. Of 24 segments reviewed, 11 were selected based on the quality of the examinations and spectrum of closure patterns. Participating otolaryngologists independently ratedNEsegments using the Golding-Kushner scale. The participants then convened and rated each of the NE segments as a group. Thirty-nine members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology met and agreed with the group ratings, creating a consensus standard. Results: Individual scores for palate and lateral wall motion showed high variability, ranging from 0 to 6 points difference from the consensus. Variability was also seen for the following qualitative findings: the Passavant ridge, aberrant pulsations, and dorsal palatal notch. The individual ratings are presented graphically to demonstrate the range of individual responses as well as to compare responses to the consensus ratings. No further changes were made to the proposed consensus ratings when reviewed by the larger group. Conclusions: Rating of NE evaluations of velopharyngeal function was variable among a group of pediatric otolaryngologists experienced in treating velopharyngeal insufficiency. These results highlight the need to develop a standardized method of reporting NE findings for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Despite this, consensus ratings were achieved that will facilitate development of a video instruction tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)923-928
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume138
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
Otolaryngology
Pediatrics
Palate
Otolaryngologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Generation of consensus in the application of a rating scale to nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function. / Tieu, David D.; Gerber, Mark E.; Milczuk, Henry; Parikh, Sanjay R.; Perkins, Jonathan A.; Yoon, Patricia J.; Sie, Kathleen C Y.

In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 138, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 923-928.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tieu, David D. ; Gerber, Mark E. ; Milczuk, Henry ; Parikh, Sanjay R. ; Perkins, Jonathan A. ; Yoon, Patricia J. ; Sie, Kathleen C Y. / Generation of consensus in the application of a rating scale to nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function. In: Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 138, No. 10. pp. 923-928.
@article{954ee74bb2594172a665c0117e6c14ae,
title = "Generation of consensus in the application of a rating scale to nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function",
abstract = "Objective: To generate consensus ratings of velopharyngeal function on nasendoscopy (NE) with the goal of creating a video instruction tool. Methods: The American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Study Group convened to identify NE segments to be included in an instructional video. Of 24 segments reviewed, 11 were selected based on the quality of the examinations and spectrum of closure patterns. Participating otolaryngologists independently ratedNEsegments using the Golding-Kushner scale. The participants then convened and rated each of the NE segments as a group. Thirty-nine members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology met and agreed with the group ratings, creating a consensus standard. Results: Individual scores for palate and lateral wall motion showed high variability, ranging from 0 to 6 points difference from the consensus. Variability was also seen for the following qualitative findings: the Passavant ridge, aberrant pulsations, and dorsal palatal notch. The individual ratings are presented graphically to demonstrate the range of individual responses as well as to compare responses to the consensus ratings. No further changes were made to the proposed consensus ratings when reviewed by the larger group. Conclusions: Rating of NE evaluations of velopharyngeal function was variable among a group of pediatric otolaryngologists experienced in treating velopharyngeal insufficiency. These results highlight the need to develop a standardized method of reporting NE findings for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Despite this, consensus ratings were achieved that will facilitate development of a video instruction tool.",
author = "Tieu, {David D.} and Gerber, {Mark E.} and Henry Milczuk and Parikh, {Sanjay R.} and Perkins, {Jonathan A.} and Yoon, {Patricia J.} and Sie, {Kathleen C Y}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1001/archotol.2013.203",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "138",
pages = "923--928",
journal = "JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery",
issn = "2168-6181",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generation of consensus in the application of a rating scale to nasendoscopic assessment of velopharyngeal function

AU - Tieu, David D.

AU - Gerber, Mark E.

AU - Milczuk, Henry

AU - Parikh, Sanjay R.

AU - Perkins, Jonathan A.

AU - Yoon, Patricia J.

AU - Sie, Kathleen C Y

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Objective: To generate consensus ratings of velopharyngeal function on nasendoscopy (NE) with the goal of creating a video instruction tool. Methods: The American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Study Group convened to identify NE segments to be included in an instructional video. Of 24 segments reviewed, 11 were selected based on the quality of the examinations and spectrum of closure patterns. Participating otolaryngologists independently ratedNEsegments using the Golding-Kushner scale. The participants then convened and rated each of the NE segments as a group. Thirty-nine members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology met and agreed with the group ratings, creating a consensus standard. Results: Individual scores for palate and lateral wall motion showed high variability, ranging from 0 to 6 points difference from the consensus. Variability was also seen for the following qualitative findings: the Passavant ridge, aberrant pulsations, and dorsal palatal notch. The individual ratings are presented graphically to demonstrate the range of individual responses as well as to compare responses to the consensus ratings. No further changes were made to the proposed consensus ratings when reviewed by the larger group. Conclusions: Rating of NE evaluations of velopharyngeal function was variable among a group of pediatric otolaryngologists experienced in treating velopharyngeal insufficiency. These results highlight the need to develop a standardized method of reporting NE findings for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Despite this, consensus ratings were achieved that will facilitate development of a video instruction tool.

AB - Objective: To generate consensus ratings of velopharyngeal function on nasendoscopy (NE) with the goal of creating a video instruction tool. Methods: The American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Study Group convened to identify NE segments to be included in an instructional video. Of 24 segments reviewed, 11 were selected based on the quality of the examinations and spectrum of closure patterns. Participating otolaryngologists independently ratedNEsegments using the Golding-Kushner scale. The participants then convened and rated each of the NE segments as a group. Thirty-nine members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology met and agreed with the group ratings, creating a consensus standard. Results: Individual scores for palate and lateral wall motion showed high variability, ranging from 0 to 6 points difference from the consensus. Variability was also seen for the following qualitative findings: the Passavant ridge, aberrant pulsations, and dorsal palatal notch. The individual ratings are presented graphically to demonstrate the range of individual responses as well as to compare responses to the consensus ratings. No further changes were made to the proposed consensus ratings when reviewed by the larger group. Conclusions: Rating of NE evaluations of velopharyngeal function was variable among a group of pediatric otolaryngologists experienced in treating velopharyngeal insufficiency. These results highlight the need to develop a standardized method of reporting NE findings for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Despite this, consensus ratings were achieved that will facilitate development of a video instruction tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867836139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867836139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archotol.2013.203

DO - 10.1001/archotol.2013.203

M3 - Article

VL - 138

SP - 923

EP - 928

JO - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

JF - JAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

SN - 2168-6181

IS - 10

ER -