Gene set analyses for interpreting microarray experiments on prokaryotic organisms

Nathan L. Tintle, Aaron A. Best, Matthew DeJongh, Dirk Van Bruggen, Fred Heffron, Steffen Porwollik, Ronald C. Taylor

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Background: Despite the widespread usage of DNA microarrays, questions remain about how best to interpret the wealth of gene-by-gene transcriptional levels that they measure. Recently, methods have been proposed which use biologically defined sets of genes in interpretation, instead of examining results gene-by-gene. Despite a serious limitation, a method based on Fisher's exact test remains one of the few plausible options for gene set analysis when an experiment has few replicates, as is typically the case for prokaryotes. Results: We extend five methods of gene set analysis from use on experiments with multiple replicates, for use on experiments with few replicates. We then use simulated and real data to compare these methods with each other and with the Fisher's exact test (FET) method. As a result of the simulation we find that a method named MAXMEAN-NR, maintains the nominal rate of false positive findings (type I error rate) while offering good statistical power and robustness to a variety of gene set distributions for set sizes of at least 10. Other methods (ABSSUM-NR or SUM-NR) are shown to be powerful for set sizes less than 10. Analysis of three sets of experimental data shows similar results. Furthermore, the MAXMEAN-NR method is shown to be able to detect biologically relevant sets as significant, when other methods (including FET) cannot. We also find that the popular GSEA-NR method performs poorly when compared to MAXMEAN-NR. Conclusion: MAXMEAN-NR is a method of gene set analysis for experiments with few replicates, as is common for prokaryotes. Results of simulation and real data analysis suggest that the MAXMEAN-NR method offers increased robustness and biological relevance of findings as compared to FET and other methods, while maintaining the nominal type I error rate.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number469
    JournalBMC bioinformatics
    Volume9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 5 2008

      Fingerprint

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Structural Biology
    • Biochemistry
    • Molecular Biology
    • Computer Science Applications
    • Applied Mathematics

    Cite this

    Tintle, N. L., Best, A. A., DeJongh, M., Van Bruggen, D., Heffron, F., Porwollik, S., & Taylor, R. C. (2008). Gene set analyses for interpreting microarray experiments on prokaryotic organisms. BMC bioinformatics, 9, [469]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-469