Fundal height: A useful screening tool for fetal growth?

Teresa N. Sparks, Yvonne W. Cheng, Blake Mclaughlin, Tania F. Esakoff, Aaron Caughey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine the utility of fundal height in screening for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-forgestational- age (LGA) neonates at term. Study design. This was a retrospective cohort study of 3627 women at University of California, San Francisco from 2002 to 2006 with term, singleton pregnancies specifically examining the 448 who had third trimester ultrasounds for size unequal to dates by fundal height. x2 analyses determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of fundal height as a screening tool for abnormal intrauterine growth. Results. The sensitivity of fundal height was 16.6% for detecting actual birthweight (BWt) > 90th percentile (p <0.001) and 17.3% for <10th percentile (p <0.001). Specificity ranged from 92.4 to 95.4%. Significant differences existed among subgroups by maternal weight, parity, age, and ethnicity. Sensitivity was lower for SGA among overweight/ obese women but higher among multiparous women. Additionally, women ≥35 years showed higher sensitivity for extreme LGA, and several notable differences were found by ethnicity such as higher sensitivity for extreme LGA among Caucasian women. Conclusion. The sensitivity of fundal height for detecting abnormal intrauterine growth was less than 35% for all subgroups, although specificity was more ideal at >90%. Other modalities should be considered to screen for growth abnormalities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)708-712
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Fetal Development
San Francisco
Third Pregnancy Trimester
Growth
Gestational Age
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Newborn Infant
Sensitivity and Specificity
Pregnancy

Keywords

  • Fundal height
  • Large for gestational age
  • Sensitivity
  • Small for gestational age
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Fundal height : A useful screening tool for fetal growth? / Sparks, Teresa N.; Cheng, Yvonne W.; Mclaughlin, Blake; Esakoff, Tania F.; Caughey, Aaron.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 708-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sparks, Teresa N. ; Cheng, Yvonne W. ; Mclaughlin, Blake ; Esakoff, Tania F. ; Caughey, Aaron. / Fundal height : A useful screening tool for fetal growth?. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 708-712.
@article{718a1377cb90453fa14b957516437c24,
title = "Fundal height: A useful screening tool for fetal growth?",
abstract = "Objective. To determine the utility of fundal height in screening for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-forgestational- age (LGA) neonates at term. Study design. This was a retrospective cohort study of 3627 women at University of California, San Francisco from 2002 to 2006 with term, singleton pregnancies specifically examining the 448 who had third trimester ultrasounds for size unequal to dates by fundal height. x2 analyses determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of fundal height as a screening tool for abnormal intrauterine growth. Results. The sensitivity of fundal height was 16.6{\%} for detecting actual birthweight (BWt) > 90th percentile (p <0.001) and 17.3{\%} for <10th percentile (p <0.001). Specificity ranged from 92.4 to 95.4{\%}. Significant differences existed among subgroups by maternal weight, parity, age, and ethnicity. Sensitivity was lower for SGA among overweight/ obese women but higher among multiparous women. Additionally, women ≥35 years showed higher sensitivity for extreme LGA, and several notable differences were found by ethnicity such as higher sensitivity for extreme LGA among Caucasian women. Conclusion. The sensitivity of fundal height for detecting abnormal intrauterine growth was less than 35{\%} for all subgroups, although specificity was more ideal at >90{\%}. Other modalities should be considered to screen for growth abnormalities.",
keywords = "Fundal height, Large for gestational age, Sensitivity, Small for gestational age, Specificity",
author = "Sparks, {Teresa N.} and Cheng, {Yvonne W.} and Blake Mclaughlin and Esakoff, {Tania F.} and Aaron Caughey",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3109/14767058.2010.516285",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "708--712",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fundal height

T2 - A useful screening tool for fetal growth?

AU - Sparks, Teresa N.

AU - Cheng, Yvonne W.

AU - Mclaughlin, Blake

AU - Esakoff, Tania F.

AU - Caughey, Aaron

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Objective. To determine the utility of fundal height in screening for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-forgestational- age (LGA) neonates at term. Study design. This was a retrospective cohort study of 3627 women at University of California, San Francisco from 2002 to 2006 with term, singleton pregnancies specifically examining the 448 who had third trimester ultrasounds for size unequal to dates by fundal height. x2 analyses determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of fundal height as a screening tool for abnormal intrauterine growth. Results. The sensitivity of fundal height was 16.6% for detecting actual birthweight (BWt) > 90th percentile (p <0.001) and 17.3% for <10th percentile (p <0.001). Specificity ranged from 92.4 to 95.4%. Significant differences existed among subgroups by maternal weight, parity, age, and ethnicity. Sensitivity was lower for SGA among overweight/ obese women but higher among multiparous women. Additionally, women ≥35 years showed higher sensitivity for extreme LGA, and several notable differences were found by ethnicity such as higher sensitivity for extreme LGA among Caucasian women. Conclusion. The sensitivity of fundal height for detecting abnormal intrauterine growth was less than 35% for all subgroups, although specificity was more ideal at >90%. Other modalities should be considered to screen for growth abnormalities.

AB - Objective. To determine the utility of fundal height in screening for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-forgestational- age (LGA) neonates at term. Study design. This was a retrospective cohort study of 3627 women at University of California, San Francisco from 2002 to 2006 with term, singleton pregnancies specifically examining the 448 who had third trimester ultrasounds for size unequal to dates by fundal height. x2 analyses determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of fundal height as a screening tool for abnormal intrauterine growth. Results. The sensitivity of fundal height was 16.6% for detecting actual birthweight (BWt) > 90th percentile (p <0.001) and 17.3% for <10th percentile (p <0.001). Specificity ranged from 92.4 to 95.4%. Significant differences existed among subgroups by maternal weight, parity, age, and ethnicity. Sensitivity was lower for SGA among overweight/ obese women but higher among multiparous women. Additionally, women ≥35 years showed higher sensitivity for extreme LGA, and several notable differences were found by ethnicity such as higher sensitivity for extreme LGA among Caucasian women. Conclusion. The sensitivity of fundal height for detecting abnormal intrauterine growth was less than 35% for all subgroups, although specificity was more ideal at >90%. Other modalities should be considered to screen for growth abnormalities.

KW - Fundal height

KW - Large for gestational age

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Small for gestational age

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953843923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953843923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2010.516285

DO - 10.3109/14767058.2010.516285

M3 - Article

C2 - 20849205

AN - SCOPUS:79953843923

VL - 24

SP - 708

EP - 712

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 5

ER -