From "old school" to "farm-to-school": Neoliberalization from the ground up

Patricia Allen, Julie Guthman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

165 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Farm-to-school (FTS) programs have garnered the attentions and energies of people in a diverse array of social locations in the food system and are serving as a sort of touchstone for many in the alternative agrifood movement. Yet, unlike other alternative agrifood initiatives, FTS programs intersect directly with the long-established institution of the welfare state, including its vestiges of New Deal farm programs and public entitlement. This paper explores how FTS is navigating the liminal terrain of public and private initiative, particularly the ways in which it interfaces with neoliberalism as both a material and discursive project. It examines the political emergence of school food programs and finds that FTS is strikingly similar to traditional school programs in objectives, but differs in approach. Yet, in their efforts to fill in the gaps created by political and economic neoliberalization, FTS advocates are in essence producing neoliberal forms and practices afresh. These include those associated with contingent labor relationships, private funding sources, and the devolution of responsibility to the local, all of which have serious consequences for social equity. The paper also discusses how FTS programs are employing the rhetoric of neoliberal governmentality, including personal responsibility and individual success, consumerism, and choice. While these may be tactical choices used to secure funding in a competitive environment, they may also contribute to the normalization of neoliberalism, further circumscribing the possibilities of what can be imagined and created to solve social problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)401-415
Number of pages15
JournalAgriculture and Human Values
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

funding
farm programs
social problems
consumer behavior
food and nutrition programs
farm to school
labor
economics
energy

Keywords

  • Alternative agrifood institutions
  • California
  • Community food security
  • Devolution
  • Farm-to-school programs
  • Neoliberalism
  • School nutrition
  • Sustainable agriculture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

From "old school" to "farm-to-school" : Neoliberalization from the ground up. / Allen, Patricia; Guthman, Julie.

In: Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.12.2006, p. 401-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cf5eef12d04a4309ab261d0225839a83,
title = "From {"}old school{"} to {"}farm-to-school{"}: Neoliberalization from the ground up",
abstract = "Farm-to-school (FTS) programs have garnered the attentions and energies of people in a diverse array of social locations in the food system and are serving as a sort of touchstone for many in the alternative agrifood movement. Yet, unlike other alternative agrifood initiatives, FTS programs intersect directly with the long-established institution of the welfare state, including its vestiges of New Deal farm programs and public entitlement. This paper explores how FTS is navigating the liminal terrain of public and private initiative, particularly the ways in which it interfaces with neoliberalism as both a material and discursive project. It examines the political emergence of school food programs and finds that FTS is strikingly similar to traditional school programs in objectives, but differs in approach. Yet, in their efforts to fill in the gaps created by political and economic neoliberalization, FTS advocates are in essence producing neoliberal forms and practices afresh. These include those associated with contingent labor relationships, private funding sources, and the devolution of responsibility to the local, all of which have serious consequences for social equity. The paper also discusses how FTS programs are employing the rhetoric of neoliberal governmentality, including personal responsibility and individual success, consumerism, and choice. While these may be tactical choices used to secure funding in a competitive environment, they may also contribute to the normalization of neoliberalism, further circumscribing the possibilities of what can be imagined and created to solve social problems.",
keywords = "Alternative agrifood institutions, California, Community food security, Devolution, Farm-to-school programs, Neoliberalism, School nutrition, Sustainable agriculture",
author = "Patricia Allen and Julie Guthman",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10460-006-9019-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "401--415",
journal = "Agriculture and Human Values",
issn = "0889-048X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From "old school" to "farm-to-school"

T2 - Neoliberalization from the ground up

AU - Allen, Patricia

AU - Guthman, Julie

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Farm-to-school (FTS) programs have garnered the attentions and energies of people in a diverse array of social locations in the food system and are serving as a sort of touchstone for many in the alternative agrifood movement. Yet, unlike other alternative agrifood initiatives, FTS programs intersect directly with the long-established institution of the welfare state, including its vestiges of New Deal farm programs and public entitlement. This paper explores how FTS is navigating the liminal terrain of public and private initiative, particularly the ways in which it interfaces with neoliberalism as both a material and discursive project. It examines the political emergence of school food programs and finds that FTS is strikingly similar to traditional school programs in objectives, but differs in approach. Yet, in their efforts to fill in the gaps created by political and economic neoliberalization, FTS advocates are in essence producing neoliberal forms and practices afresh. These include those associated with contingent labor relationships, private funding sources, and the devolution of responsibility to the local, all of which have serious consequences for social equity. The paper also discusses how FTS programs are employing the rhetoric of neoliberal governmentality, including personal responsibility and individual success, consumerism, and choice. While these may be tactical choices used to secure funding in a competitive environment, they may also contribute to the normalization of neoliberalism, further circumscribing the possibilities of what can be imagined and created to solve social problems.

AB - Farm-to-school (FTS) programs have garnered the attentions and energies of people in a diverse array of social locations in the food system and are serving as a sort of touchstone for many in the alternative agrifood movement. Yet, unlike other alternative agrifood initiatives, FTS programs intersect directly with the long-established institution of the welfare state, including its vestiges of New Deal farm programs and public entitlement. This paper explores how FTS is navigating the liminal terrain of public and private initiative, particularly the ways in which it interfaces with neoliberalism as both a material and discursive project. It examines the political emergence of school food programs and finds that FTS is strikingly similar to traditional school programs in objectives, but differs in approach. Yet, in their efforts to fill in the gaps created by political and economic neoliberalization, FTS advocates are in essence producing neoliberal forms and practices afresh. These include those associated with contingent labor relationships, private funding sources, and the devolution of responsibility to the local, all of which have serious consequences for social equity. The paper also discusses how FTS programs are employing the rhetoric of neoliberal governmentality, including personal responsibility and individual success, consumerism, and choice. While these may be tactical choices used to secure funding in a competitive environment, they may also contribute to the normalization of neoliberalism, further circumscribing the possibilities of what can be imagined and created to solve social problems.

KW - Alternative agrifood institutions

KW - California

KW - Community food security

KW - Devolution

KW - Farm-to-school programs

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - School nutrition

KW - Sustainable agriculture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845266728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845266728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10460-006-9019-z

DO - 10.1007/s10460-006-9019-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845266728

VL - 23

SP - 401

EP - 415

JO - Agriculture and Human Values

JF - Agriculture and Human Values

SN - 0889-048X

IS - 4

ER -