Frequent users of emergency department services: Gaps in knowledge and a proposed research agenda

Jesse M. Pines, Brent R. Asplin, Amy H. Kaji, Robert (Bob) Lowe, David J. Magid, Maria Raven, Ellen J. Weber, Donald M. Yealy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

120 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Frequent use of emergency department (ED) services is often perceived to be a potentially preventable misuse of resources. The underlying assumption is that similar and more appropriate care can be delivered outside of EDs at a lower cost. To reduce costs and incentivize more appropriate use of services, there have been efforts to design interventions to transition health care utilization of frequent users from EDs to other settings such as outpatient clinics. Many of these efforts have succeeded in smaller trials, but wider use remains elusive for varying reasons. There are also some fundamental problems with the assumption that all or even the majority of frequent ED use is misuse and invoking reasons for that excessive use. These tenuous assumptions become evident when frequent users as a group are compared to less frequent users. Specifically, frequent users tend to have high levels of frequent ED use, have a higher severity of illness, be older, have fewer personal resources, be chronically ill, present for pain-related complaints, and have government insurance (Medicare or Medicaid). Because of the unique characteristics of the population of frequent users, we propose a research agenda that aims to increase the understanding of frequent ED use, by: 1) creating an accepted categorization system for frequent users, 2) predicting which patients are at risk for becoming or remaining frequent users, 3) implementing both ED- and non-ED-based interventions, and 4) conducting qualitative studies of frequent ED users to explore reasons and identify factors that are subject to intervention and explore specific differences among populations by condition, such as mental illness and heart failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Research
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Medicaid
Population Characteristics
Medicare
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Insurance
Chronic Disease
Heart Failure
Pain
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Frequent users of emergency department services : Gaps in knowledge and a proposed research agenda. / Pines, Jesse M.; Asplin, Brent R.; Kaji, Amy H.; Lowe, Robert (Bob); Magid, David J.; Raven, Maria; Weber, Ellen J.; Yealy, Donald M.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 6, 06.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pines, Jesse M. ; Asplin, Brent R. ; Kaji, Amy H. ; Lowe, Robert (Bob) ; Magid, David J. ; Raven, Maria ; Weber, Ellen J. ; Yealy, Donald M. / Frequent users of emergency department services : Gaps in knowledge and a proposed research agenda. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 6.
@article{d3ef8163dc474b368969476419832057,
title = "Frequent users of emergency department services: Gaps in knowledge and a proposed research agenda",
abstract = "Frequent use of emergency department (ED) services is often perceived to be a potentially preventable misuse of resources. The underlying assumption is that similar and more appropriate care can be delivered outside of EDs at a lower cost. To reduce costs and incentivize more appropriate use of services, there have been efforts to design interventions to transition health care utilization of frequent users from EDs to other settings such as outpatient clinics. Many of these efforts have succeeded in smaller trials, but wider use remains elusive for varying reasons. There are also some fundamental problems with the assumption that all or even the majority of frequent ED use is misuse and invoking reasons for that excessive use. These tenuous assumptions become evident when frequent users as a group are compared to less frequent users. Specifically, frequent users tend to have high levels of frequent ED use, have a higher severity of illness, be older, have fewer personal resources, be chronically ill, present for pain-related complaints, and have government insurance (Medicare or Medicaid). Because of the unique characteristics of the population of frequent users, we propose a research agenda that aims to increase the understanding of frequent ED use, by: 1) creating an accepted categorization system for frequent users, 2) predicting which patients are at risk for becoming or remaining frequent users, 3) implementing both ED- and non-ED-based interventions, and 4) conducting qualitative studies of frequent ED users to explore reasons and identify factors that are subject to intervention and explore specific differences among populations by condition, such as mental illness and heart failure.",
author = "Pines, {Jesse M.} and Asplin, {Brent R.} and Kaji, {Amy H.} and Lowe, {Robert (Bob)} and Magid, {David J.} and Maria Raven and Weber, {Ellen J.} and Yealy, {Donald M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01086.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequent users of emergency department services

T2 - Gaps in knowledge and a proposed research agenda

AU - Pines, Jesse M.

AU - Asplin, Brent R.

AU - Kaji, Amy H.

AU - Lowe, Robert (Bob)

AU - Magid, David J.

AU - Raven, Maria

AU - Weber, Ellen J.

AU - Yealy, Donald M.

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Frequent use of emergency department (ED) services is often perceived to be a potentially preventable misuse of resources. The underlying assumption is that similar and more appropriate care can be delivered outside of EDs at a lower cost. To reduce costs and incentivize more appropriate use of services, there have been efforts to design interventions to transition health care utilization of frequent users from EDs to other settings such as outpatient clinics. Many of these efforts have succeeded in smaller trials, but wider use remains elusive for varying reasons. There are also some fundamental problems with the assumption that all or even the majority of frequent ED use is misuse and invoking reasons for that excessive use. These tenuous assumptions become evident when frequent users as a group are compared to less frequent users. Specifically, frequent users tend to have high levels of frequent ED use, have a higher severity of illness, be older, have fewer personal resources, be chronically ill, present for pain-related complaints, and have government insurance (Medicare or Medicaid). Because of the unique characteristics of the population of frequent users, we propose a research agenda that aims to increase the understanding of frequent ED use, by: 1) creating an accepted categorization system for frequent users, 2) predicting which patients are at risk for becoming or remaining frequent users, 3) implementing both ED- and non-ED-based interventions, and 4) conducting qualitative studies of frequent ED users to explore reasons and identify factors that are subject to intervention and explore specific differences among populations by condition, such as mental illness and heart failure.

AB - Frequent use of emergency department (ED) services is often perceived to be a potentially preventable misuse of resources. The underlying assumption is that similar and more appropriate care can be delivered outside of EDs at a lower cost. To reduce costs and incentivize more appropriate use of services, there have been efforts to design interventions to transition health care utilization of frequent users from EDs to other settings such as outpatient clinics. Many of these efforts have succeeded in smaller trials, but wider use remains elusive for varying reasons. There are also some fundamental problems with the assumption that all or even the majority of frequent ED use is misuse and invoking reasons for that excessive use. These tenuous assumptions become evident when frequent users as a group are compared to less frequent users. Specifically, frequent users tend to have high levels of frequent ED use, have a higher severity of illness, be older, have fewer personal resources, be chronically ill, present for pain-related complaints, and have government insurance (Medicare or Medicaid). Because of the unique characteristics of the population of frequent users, we propose a research agenda that aims to increase the understanding of frequent ED use, by: 1) creating an accepted categorization system for frequent users, 2) predicting which patients are at risk for becoming or remaining frequent users, 3) implementing both ED- and non-ED-based interventions, and 4) conducting qualitative studies of frequent ED users to explore reasons and identify factors that are subject to intervention and explore specific differences among populations by condition, such as mental illness and heart failure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959303794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959303794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01086.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01086.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21676051

AN - SCOPUS:79959303794

VL - 18

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 6

ER -