Frequency and etiology of solitary hot spots in the pelvis at whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging

Sara Khademi, Antonio C. Westphalen, Emily M. Webb, Bonnie N. Joe, Shiva Badiee, Randy A. Hawkins, Fergus Coakley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the frequency and etiology of a single hypermetabolic focus within the pelvis with no other areas of increased 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the reminder of the whole body in an oncological population. Method and Materials: We retrospectively examined the first 700 whole-body PET/CT scans performed at our institution for baseline staging or follow-up of cancer and identified all patients with a solitary focus of increased FDG uptake in the pelvis. All available medical records and imaging findings in these patients were reviewed in order to determine the etiology of increased FDG uptake. Results: Eight (1.1%) of the 700 patients had a solitary hot spot in the pelvis at positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging, consisting of seven of 380 women and one of 320 men. In the seven women, increased FDG uptake was due to physiological endometrial uptake (n=2), leiomyoma (n=1), corpus luteum cyst (n=1), physiological ovarian uptake (n=1), urinary leak (n=1), and nonspecific colitis (n=1). In the man, uptake was due to recurrent rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma. None of the 700 patients was found to have metastatic disease in the pelvis. Conclusion: Isolated pelvic hot spots at PET/CT imaging in an oncological population are not common and usually benign; physiological endometrial or ovarian uptake is the single commonest cause.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-48
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pelvis
Ovarian Cysts
Leiomyoma
Diagnostic Imaging
Colitis
Population
Medical Records
Adenocarcinoma
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • F-FDG
  • Helical CT
  • Pelvis
  • PET Scan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Frequency and etiology of solitary hot spots in the pelvis at whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. / Khademi, Sara; Westphalen, Antonio C.; Webb, Emily M.; Joe, Bonnie N.; Badiee, Shiva; Hawkins, Randy A.; Coakley, Fergus.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 44-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khademi, Sara ; Westphalen, Antonio C. ; Webb, Emily M. ; Joe, Bonnie N. ; Badiee, Shiva ; Hawkins, Randy A. ; Coakley, Fergus. / Frequency and etiology of solitary hot spots in the pelvis at whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. In: Clinical Imaging. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 44-48.
@article{2a7418a1bfac46dfbfce5e394dc2bade,
title = "Frequency and etiology of solitary hot spots in the pelvis at whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine the frequency and etiology of a single hypermetabolic focus within the pelvis with no other areas of increased 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the reminder of the whole body in an oncological population. Method and Materials: We retrospectively examined the first 700 whole-body PET/CT scans performed at our institution for baseline staging or follow-up of cancer and identified all patients with a solitary focus of increased FDG uptake in the pelvis. All available medical records and imaging findings in these patients were reviewed in order to determine the etiology of increased FDG uptake. Results: Eight (1.1{\%}) of the 700 patients had a solitary hot spot in the pelvis at positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging, consisting of seven of 380 women and one of 320 men. In the seven women, increased FDG uptake was due to physiological endometrial uptake (n=2), leiomyoma (n=1), corpus luteum cyst (n=1), physiological ovarian uptake (n=1), urinary leak (n=1), and nonspecific colitis (n=1). In the man, uptake was due to recurrent rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma. None of the 700 patients was found to have metastatic disease in the pelvis. Conclusion: Isolated pelvic hot spots at PET/CT imaging in an oncological population are not common and usually benign; physiological endometrial or ovarian uptake is the single commonest cause.",
keywords = "F-FDG, Helical CT, Pelvis, PET Scan",
author = "Sara Khademi and Westphalen, {Antonio C.} and Webb, {Emily M.} and Joe, {Bonnie N.} and Shiva Badiee and Hawkins, {Randy A.} and Fergus Coakley",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "44--48",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequency and etiology of solitary hot spots in the pelvis at whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging

AU - Khademi, Sara

AU - Westphalen, Antonio C.

AU - Webb, Emily M.

AU - Joe, Bonnie N.

AU - Badiee, Shiva

AU - Hawkins, Randy A.

AU - Coakley, Fergus

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine the frequency and etiology of a single hypermetabolic focus within the pelvis with no other areas of increased 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the reminder of the whole body in an oncological population. Method and Materials: We retrospectively examined the first 700 whole-body PET/CT scans performed at our institution for baseline staging or follow-up of cancer and identified all patients with a solitary focus of increased FDG uptake in the pelvis. All available medical records and imaging findings in these patients were reviewed in order to determine the etiology of increased FDG uptake. Results: Eight (1.1%) of the 700 patients had a solitary hot spot in the pelvis at positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging, consisting of seven of 380 women and one of 320 men. In the seven women, increased FDG uptake was due to physiological endometrial uptake (n=2), leiomyoma (n=1), corpus luteum cyst (n=1), physiological ovarian uptake (n=1), urinary leak (n=1), and nonspecific colitis (n=1). In the man, uptake was due to recurrent rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma. None of the 700 patients was found to have metastatic disease in the pelvis. Conclusion: Isolated pelvic hot spots at PET/CT imaging in an oncological population are not common and usually benign; physiological endometrial or ovarian uptake is the single commonest cause.

AB - Purpose: To determine the frequency and etiology of a single hypermetabolic focus within the pelvis with no other areas of increased 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the reminder of the whole body in an oncological population. Method and Materials: We retrospectively examined the first 700 whole-body PET/CT scans performed at our institution for baseline staging or follow-up of cancer and identified all patients with a solitary focus of increased FDG uptake in the pelvis. All available medical records and imaging findings in these patients were reviewed in order to determine the etiology of increased FDG uptake. Results: Eight (1.1%) of the 700 patients had a solitary hot spot in the pelvis at positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging, consisting of seven of 380 women and one of 320 men. In the seven women, increased FDG uptake was due to physiological endometrial uptake (n=2), leiomyoma (n=1), corpus luteum cyst (n=1), physiological ovarian uptake (n=1), urinary leak (n=1), and nonspecific colitis (n=1). In the man, uptake was due to recurrent rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma. None of the 700 patients was found to have metastatic disease in the pelvis. Conclusion: Isolated pelvic hot spots at PET/CT imaging in an oncological population are not common and usually benign; physiological endometrial or ovarian uptake is the single commonest cause.

KW - F-FDG

KW - Helical CT

KW - Pelvis

KW - PET Scan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149191375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149191375&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.026

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 19135929

AN - SCOPUS:58149191375

VL - 33

SP - 44

EP - 48

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

IS - 1

ER -