Form and exploration of mechanical stability limits in erect stance

Gin McCollum, Todd K. Leen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

151 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The stability limits of erect stance are described as a geometrical structure in a movement space. Mechanical properties and response latency, a neural property, are determining factors for the stability limits. Standing stability limits of adults and young children are compared, and a simple scheme is suggested by means of which infants can discover the stability limits as they learn to stand. The mechanics of different standing movements are discussed because their spatial and temporal properties relate directly to their different stability limits. The combination of the stability limits for different movements gives a total set of stability limits, a different structure for adults than for children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-244
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Motor Behavior
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mechanics
Reaction Time
Young Adult

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biophysics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Form and exploration of mechanical stability limits in erect stance. / McCollum, Gin; Leen, Todd K.

In: Journal of Motor Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1989, p. 225-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCollum, Gin ; Leen, Todd K. / Form and exploration of mechanical stability limits in erect stance. In: Journal of Motor Behavior. 1989 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 225-244.
@article{c39e8350b12647a2b9cc3d0eedcac848,
title = "Form and exploration of mechanical stability limits in erect stance",
abstract = "The stability limits of erect stance are described as a geometrical structure in a movement space. Mechanical properties and response latency, a neural property, are determining factors for the stability limits. Standing stability limits of adults and young children are compared, and a simple scheme is suggested by means of which infants can discover the stability limits as they learn to stand. The mechanics of different standing movements are discussed because their spatial and temporal properties relate directly to their different stability limits. The combination of the stability limits for different movements gives a total set of stability limits, a different structure for adults than for children.",
author = "Gin McCollum and Leen, {Todd K.}",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1080/00222895.1989.10735479",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "225--244",
journal = "Journal of Motor Behavior",
issn = "0022-2895",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Form and exploration of mechanical stability limits in erect stance

AU - McCollum, Gin

AU - Leen, Todd K.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The stability limits of erect stance are described as a geometrical structure in a movement space. Mechanical properties and response latency, a neural property, are determining factors for the stability limits. Standing stability limits of adults and young children are compared, and a simple scheme is suggested by means of which infants can discover the stability limits as they learn to stand. The mechanics of different standing movements are discussed because their spatial and temporal properties relate directly to their different stability limits. The combination of the stability limits for different movements gives a total set of stability limits, a different structure for adults than for children.

AB - The stability limits of erect stance are described as a geometrical structure in a movement space. Mechanical properties and response latency, a neural property, are determining factors for the stability limits. Standing stability limits of adults and young children are compared, and a simple scheme is suggested by means of which infants can discover the stability limits as they learn to stand. The mechanics of different standing movements are discussed because their spatial and temporal properties relate directly to their different stability limits. The combination of the stability limits for different movements gives a total set of stability limits, a different structure for adults than for children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952539780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952539780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00222895.1989.10735479

DO - 10.1080/00222895.1989.10735479

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84952539780

VL - 21

SP - 225

EP - 244

JO - Journal of Motor Behavior

JF - Journal of Motor Behavior

SN - 0022-2895

IS - 3

ER -