Follow-up study of patients allergic to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: Retention of information, compliance, course, and persistence of allergy

Kenneth M. Kang, Gwyn Corey, Frances Storrs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It is generally believed that the more patients know about an allergen and where it is found, the better the prognosis is for allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: This study sought to evaluate retention of information and compliance with therapeutic directives and determine whether they correlated with the course of dermatitis in patients allergic to formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasers diagnosed in the preceding 5 months to 2 1 2 years. Methods: Twenty-two patients were surveyed by telephone, and each patient was asked to return for repeat patch testing. Results: Seventeen patients (77%) said they had persistent dermatitis, but of these, 15 (88%) believed they were improved. Five patients (23%) could spontaneously recall their allergens, and 12 (55%) could access and read to us the allergen list that we gave them. Fourteen patients (64%) always read labels, 5 (23%) sometimes did, and 3 (13%) never did. The 8 patients who were again patch tested had a total of 24 formaldehyde and formaldehyde releaser reactions; 16 (67%) were maintained and 8 (33%) were lost. No statistical relationship was found between improvement and any of the above variables, yet 91% of these patients were either improved or free of dermatitis. Conclusion: A combination of variables, including knowing the diagnosis, reading labels of products they use, and following our recommendations, explains improvement after contact dermatitis clinic evaluation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)209-215
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Contact Dermatitis
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Formaldehyde
Compliance
Hypersensitivity
Dermatitis
Allergens
Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis
Telephone
Reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

@article{3a1f6dfd508343afb5ded4d782674b08,
title = "Follow-up study of patients allergic to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers: Retention of information, compliance, course, and persistence of allergy",
abstract = "Background: It is generally believed that the more patients know about an allergen and where it is found, the better the prognosis is for allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: This study sought to evaluate retention of information and compliance with therapeutic directives and determine whether they correlated with the course of dermatitis in patients allergic to formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasers diagnosed in the preceding 5 months to 2 1 2 years. Methods: Twenty-two patients were surveyed by telephone, and each patient was asked to return for repeat patch testing. Results: Seventeen patients (77{\%}) said they had persistent dermatitis, but of these, 15 (88{\%}) believed they were improved. Five patients (23{\%}) could spontaneously recall their allergens, and 12 (55{\%}) could access and read to us the allergen list that we gave them. Fourteen patients (64{\%}) always read labels, 5 (23{\%}) sometimes did, and 3 (13{\%}) never did. The 8 patients who were again patch tested had a total of 24 formaldehyde and formaldehyde releaser reactions; 16 (67{\%}) were maintained and 8 (33{\%}) were lost. No statistical relationship was found between improvement and any of the above variables, yet 91{\%} of these patients were either improved or free of dermatitis. Conclusion: A combination of variables, including knowing the diagnosis, reading labels of products they use, and following our recommendations, explains improvement after contact dermatitis clinic evaluation.",
author = "Kang, {Kenneth M.} and Gwyn Corey and Frances Storrs",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/1046-199X(95)90044-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "209--215",
journal = "Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug",
issn = "1710-3568",
publisher = "Decker Publishing",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Follow-up study of patients allergic to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers

T2 - Retention of information, compliance, course, and persistence of allergy

AU - Kang, Kenneth M.

AU - Corey, Gwyn

AU - Storrs, Frances

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Background: It is generally believed that the more patients know about an allergen and where it is found, the better the prognosis is for allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: This study sought to evaluate retention of information and compliance with therapeutic directives and determine whether they correlated with the course of dermatitis in patients allergic to formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasers diagnosed in the preceding 5 months to 2 1 2 years. Methods: Twenty-two patients were surveyed by telephone, and each patient was asked to return for repeat patch testing. Results: Seventeen patients (77%) said they had persistent dermatitis, but of these, 15 (88%) believed they were improved. Five patients (23%) could spontaneously recall their allergens, and 12 (55%) could access and read to us the allergen list that we gave them. Fourteen patients (64%) always read labels, 5 (23%) sometimes did, and 3 (13%) never did. The 8 patients who were again patch tested had a total of 24 formaldehyde and formaldehyde releaser reactions; 16 (67%) were maintained and 8 (33%) were lost. No statistical relationship was found between improvement and any of the above variables, yet 91% of these patients were either improved or free of dermatitis. Conclusion: A combination of variables, including knowing the diagnosis, reading labels of products they use, and following our recommendations, explains improvement after contact dermatitis clinic evaluation.

AB - Background: It is generally believed that the more patients know about an allergen and where it is found, the better the prognosis is for allergic contact dermatitis. Objective: This study sought to evaluate retention of information and compliance with therapeutic directives and determine whether they correlated with the course of dermatitis in patients allergic to formaldehyde or formaldehyde releasers diagnosed in the preceding 5 months to 2 1 2 years. Methods: Twenty-two patients were surveyed by telephone, and each patient was asked to return for repeat patch testing. Results: Seventeen patients (77%) said they had persistent dermatitis, but of these, 15 (88%) believed they were improved. Five patients (23%) could spontaneously recall their allergens, and 12 (55%) could access and read to us the allergen list that we gave them. Fourteen patients (64%) always read labels, 5 (23%) sometimes did, and 3 (13%) never did. The 8 patients who were again patch tested had a total of 24 formaldehyde and formaldehyde releaser reactions; 16 (67%) were maintained and 8 (33%) were lost. No statistical relationship was found between improvement and any of the above variables, yet 91% of these patients were either improved or free of dermatitis. Conclusion: A combination of variables, including knowing the diagnosis, reading labels of products they use, and following our recommendations, explains improvement after contact dermatitis clinic evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028788182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028788182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/1046-199X(95)90044-6

DO - 10.1016/1046-199X(95)90044-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028788182

VL - 6

SP - 209

EP - 215

JO - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug

JF - Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug

SN - 1710-3568

IS - 4

ER -