Follicular aspiration: A comparison of an ultrasonic endovaginal transducer with fixed needle guide and other retrieval methods

D. B. Seifer, R. L. Collins, D. M. Paushter, C. R. George, M. M. Quigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ultrasonic techniques have been developed as alternatives to conventional laparoscopic aspiration for oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Given the advantages (less risk, lower cost, and greater patient acceptance) of these alternative techniques, it is appropriate to assess their efficacy compared with traditional laparoscopic retrieval. This articles examines the recovery rate of oocytes and their subsequent fertilization rate with the use of an ultrasonic endovaginal transducer with fixed needle guide and compares these results with other retrieval methods. Comparisons were made between laparoscopic harvesting (n = 71, group I), ultrasonic transabdominal transvesical (n = 21, group II), and ultrasonic vaginal transducer (n = 76, group III). The data demonstrate comparable success using an ultrasonic endovaginal transducer with fixed needle guide. The authors believe this technique to be the procedure of choice for all routine oocyte retrievals during IVF treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)462-467
Number of pages6
JournalFertility and sterility
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Follicular aspiration: A comparison of an ultrasonic endovaginal transducer with fixed needle guide and other retrieval methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this