Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

Richard (Rick) Deyo, Samuel F. Dworkin, Dagmar Amtmann, Gunnar Andersson, David Borenstein, Eugene Carragee, John Carrino, Roger Chou, Karon Cook, Anthony Delitto, Christine Goertz, Partap Khalsa, John Loeser, Sean Mackey, James Panagis, James Rainville, Tor Tosteson, Dennis Turk, Michael Von Korff, Debra K. Weiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. METHODS:: The NIH Pain Consortium therefore charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. RESULTS:: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum dataset to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. CONCLUSIONS:: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect that the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-712
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Journal of Pain
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Low Back Pain
Research
Pain
Research Personnel
Organized Financing
Nervous System
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Phenotype

Keywords

  • chronic low back pain
  • low back pain
  • minimum dataset
  • NIH Task Force
  • research standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Deyo, R. R., Dworkin, S. F., Amtmann, D., Andersson, G., Borenstein, D., Carragee, E., ... Weiner, D. K. (2014). Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. Clinical Journal of Pain, 30(8), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000120

Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. / Deyo, Richard (Rick); Dworkin, Samuel F.; Amtmann, Dagmar; Andersson, Gunnar; Borenstein, David; Carragee, Eugene; Carrino, John; Chou, Roger; Cook, Karon; Delitto, Anthony; Goertz, Christine; Khalsa, Partap; Loeser, John; Mackey, Sean; Panagis, James; Rainville, James; Tosteson, Tor; Turk, Dennis; Von Korff, Michael; Weiner, Debra K.

In: Clinical Journal of Pain, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2014, p. 701-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deyo, RR, Dworkin, SF, Amtmann, D, Andersson, G, Borenstein, D, Carragee, E, Carrino, J, Chou, R, Cook, K, Delitto, A, Goertz, C, Khalsa, P, Loeser, J, Mackey, S, Panagis, J, Rainville, J, Tosteson, T, Turk, D, Von Korff, M & Weiner, DK 2014, 'Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain', Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000120
Deyo, Richard (Rick) ; Dworkin, Samuel F. ; Amtmann, Dagmar ; Andersson, Gunnar ; Borenstein, David ; Carragee, Eugene ; Carrino, John ; Chou, Roger ; Cook, Karon ; Delitto, Anthony ; Goertz, Christine ; Khalsa, Partap ; Loeser, John ; Mackey, Sean ; Panagis, James ; Rainville, James ; Tosteson, Tor ; Turk, Dennis ; Von Korff, Michael ; Weiner, Debra K. / Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. In: Clinical Journal of Pain. 2014 ; Vol. 30, No. 8. pp. 701-712.
@article{0e856d575f894d2d8d79386d489b324a,
title = "Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. METHODS:: The NIH Pain Consortium therefore charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. RESULTS:: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum dataset to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting {"}responder analyses{"} in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. CONCLUSIONS:: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect that the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.",
keywords = "chronic low back pain, low back pain, minimum dataset, NIH Task Force, research standards",
author = "Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Dworkin, {Samuel F.} and Dagmar Amtmann and Gunnar Andersson and David Borenstein and Eugene Carragee and John Carrino and Roger Chou and Karon Cook and Anthony Delitto and Christine Goertz and Partap Khalsa and John Loeser and Sean Mackey and James Panagis and James Rainville and Tor Tosteson and Dennis Turk and {Von Korff}, Michael and Weiner, {Debra K.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/AJP.0000000000000120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "701--712",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Pain",
issn = "0749-8047",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Focus article report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Dworkin, Samuel F.

AU - Amtmann, Dagmar

AU - Andersson, Gunnar

AU - Borenstein, David

AU - Carragee, Eugene

AU - Carrino, John

AU - Chou, Roger

AU - Cook, Karon

AU - Delitto, Anthony

AU - Goertz, Christine

AU - Khalsa, Partap

AU - Loeser, John

AU - Mackey, Sean

AU - Panagis, James

AU - Rainville, James

AU - Tosteson, Tor

AU - Turk, Dennis

AU - Von Korff, Michael

AU - Weiner, Debra K.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. METHODS:: The NIH Pain Consortium therefore charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. RESULTS:: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum dataset to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. CONCLUSIONS:: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect that the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.

AB - BACKGROUND:: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed non-specific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. METHODS:: The NIH Pain Consortium therefore charged a Research Task Force (RTF) to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting. RESULTS:: The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum dataset to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the PROMIS methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. CONCLUSIONS:: The RTF believes these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of chronic low back pain. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect that the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.

KW - chronic low back pain

KW - low back pain

KW - minimum dataset

KW - NIH Task Force

KW - research standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903981950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903981950&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000120

DO - 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000120

M3 - Article

C2 - 24988192

AN - SCOPUS:84903981950

VL - 30

SP - 701

EP - 712

JO - Clinical Journal of Pain

JF - Clinical Journal of Pain

SN - 0749-8047

IS - 8

ER -