Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests

Sinval A Rodrigues Junior, Jack Ferracane, Álvaro Della Bona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the flexural strength and the Weibull modulus of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite by means of 3- and 4-point bending tests. Methods: Thirty specimens of Filtek Z250™ (3M/ESPE) and Filtek Supreme™ (3M/ESPE) were prepared for each test according to the ISO 4049/2000 specification. After 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C the specimens were submitted to 3- and 4-point bending tests using a universal testing machine DL2000 (EMIC) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Flexural strength data were calculated and submitted to Student's t-test (α = 0.05) and Weibull statistics. The fractured surfaces were analyzed based on fractographic principles. Results: The two composites had equivalent strength in both test methods. However, the test designs significantly affected the flexural strength of the microhybrid and the nanofill composites. Weibull modulus (m) of Supreme™ was similar with both tests, while for Z250™, a higher m was observed with the 3-point bending test. Critical flaws were most often associated with the specimen's surface (up to 90%) and were characterized as surface scratches/grooves, non-uniform distribution of phases, inclusions and voids. Significance: Flexural strength as measured by the 3-point bending test is higher than by the 4-point bending test, due to the smaller flaw containing area involved in the former. Despite the large difference in average filler size between the composites, the volume fraction of the filler in both materials is similar, which was probably the reason for similar mean flexural strength values and fracture behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-431
Number of pages6
JournalDental Materials
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Bending tests
Bending strength
Composite materials
Fillers
Students
Water
Defects
Volume fraction
Statistics
Specifications
Testing
Filtek Z250
Filtek Supreme

Keywords

  • Composite resin
  • Flexural strength
  • Fractography
  • Nanofiller
  • Weibull statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests. / Junior, Sinval A Rodrigues; Ferracane, Jack; Bona, Álvaro Della.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 24, No. 3, 03.2008, p. 426-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b27d9ccff9645aeabe87a2ccb89e6fd,
title = "Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the flexural strength and the Weibull modulus of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite by means of 3- and 4-point bending tests. Methods: Thirty specimens of Filtek Z250™ (3M/ESPE) and Filtek Supreme™ (3M/ESPE) were prepared for each test according to the ISO 4049/2000 specification. After 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C the specimens were submitted to 3- and 4-point bending tests using a universal testing machine DL2000 (EMIC) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Flexural strength data were calculated and submitted to Student's t-test (α = 0.05) and Weibull statistics. The fractured surfaces were analyzed based on fractographic principles. Results: The two composites had equivalent strength in both test methods. However, the test designs significantly affected the flexural strength of the microhybrid and the nanofill composites. Weibull modulus (m) of Supreme™ was similar with both tests, while for Z250™, a higher m was observed with the 3-point bending test. Critical flaws were most often associated with the specimen's surface (up to 90{\%}) and were characterized as surface scratches/grooves, non-uniform distribution of phases, inclusions and voids. Significance: Flexural strength as measured by the 3-point bending test is higher than by the 4-point bending test, due to the smaller flaw containing area involved in the former. Despite the large difference in average filler size between the composites, the volume fraction of the filler in both materials is similar, which was probably the reason for similar mean flexural strength values and fracture behavior.",
keywords = "Composite resin, Flexural strength, Fractography, Nanofiller, Weibull statistics",
author = "Junior, {Sinval A Rodrigues} and Jack Ferracane and Bona, {{\'A}lvaro Della}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "426--431",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests

AU - Junior, Sinval A Rodrigues

AU - Ferracane, Jack

AU - Bona, Álvaro Della

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the flexural strength and the Weibull modulus of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite by means of 3- and 4-point bending tests. Methods: Thirty specimens of Filtek Z250™ (3M/ESPE) and Filtek Supreme™ (3M/ESPE) were prepared for each test according to the ISO 4049/2000 specification. After 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C the specimens were submitted to 3- and 4-point bending tests using a universal testing machine DL2000 (EMIC) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Flexural strength data were calculated and submitted to Student's t-test (α = 0.05) and Weibull statistics. The fractured surfaces were analyzed based on fractographic principles. Results: The two composites had equivalent strength in both test methods. However, the test designs significantly affected the flexural strength of the microhybrid and the nanofill composites. Weibull modulus (m) of Supreme™ was similar with both tests, while for Z250™, a higher m was observed with the 3-point bending test. Critical flaws were most often associated with the specimen's surface (up to 90%) and were characterized as surface scratches/grooves, non-uniform distribution of phases, inclusions and voids. Significance: Flexural strength as measured by the 3-point bending test is higher than by the 4-point bending test, due to the smaller flaw containing area involved in the former. Despite the large difference in average filler size between the composites, the volume fraction of the filler in both materials is similar, which was probably the reason for similar mean flexural strength values and fracture behavior.

AB - Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the flexural strength and the Weibull modulus of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite by means of 3- and 4-point bending tests. Methods: Thirty specimens of Filtek Z250™ (3M/ESPE) and Filtek Supreme™ (3M/ESPE) were prepared for each test according to the ISO 4049/2000 specification. After 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C the specimens were submitted to 3- and 4-point bending tests using a universal testing machine DL2000 (EMIC) with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Flexural strength data were calculated and submitted to Student's t-test (α = 0.05) and Weibull statistics. The fractured surfaces were analyzed based on fractographic principles. Results: The two composites had equivalent strength in both test methods. However, the test designs significantly affected the flexural strength of the microhybrid and the nanofill composites. Weibull modulus (m) of Supreme™ was similar with both tests, while for Z250™, a higher m was observed with the 3-point bending test. Critical flaws were most often associated with the specimen's surface (up to 90%) and were characterized as surface scratches/grooves, non-uniform distribution of phases, inclusions and voids. Significance: Flexural strength as measured by the 3-point bending test is higher than by the 4-point bending test, due to the smaller flaw containing area involved in the former. Despite the large difference in average filler size between the composites, the volume fraction of the filler in both materials is similar, which was probably the reason for similar mean flexural strength values and fracture behavior.

KW - Composite resin

KW - Flexural strength

KW - Fractography

KW - Nanofiller

KW - Weibull statistics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349168108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349168108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.013

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 17681372

AN - SCOPUS:38349168108

VL - 24

SP - 426

EP - 431

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 3

ER -