Flexible for whom? Flex crops, crises, fixes and the politics of exchanging use values in US corn production

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Flexible allocation of crops among food and non-food uses is a key driver of global agri-food system change. Focusing on United States corn production, I explore the dynamics of flex crops, scrutinizing agri-industrial relationships and the distribution of agri-food system value and control. I situate crop flexing as exchanging use value, as opposed to converting use into exchange value without altering the commodity's use. Asking ‘Flexible for whom?' in the context of agri-food system crises, I find: (1) flex crops exacerbate contradictory food security and over supply crises, and that the distribution of flexibility and benefit in the agri-food system they provide depends on the organization of labor; (2) crises of accumulation tie flex crops to agri-food system financialization, which subordinates use to exchange value, obfuscating their relationship and distancing agricultural products and uses from their basis in nature and labor; and (3) debates over US corn flexing illustrate the utility of focusing on power and politics in crop flexing decisions and demonstrate US corn flexing to be a fix for climate and accumulation crises. Findings suggest that examining the distribution of value and control and the positions of labor and nature in the agri-food system may be productive for global flex crop research and advocacy in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-139
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Peasant Studies
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • biofuels
  • corn
  • ethanol
  • flex crops
  • food crises
  • US agriculture
  • value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Flexible for whom? Flex crops, crises, fixes and the politics of exchanging use values in US corn production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this