Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations: Evidence from three large prospective studies

Clermont E. Dionne, Natalie Le Sage, Renée Louise Franche, Michel Dorval, Claire Bombardier, Richard (Rick) Deyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study were as follows: (1) to investigate whether the predictive validity of a previously developed back pain prediction rule could be improved; (2) to determine if the rule can be shortened without loss of predictive validity; (3) to compare the rule with the physician's judgment; (4) to assess, in a different population, its 2-year predictive validity; and (5) to evaluate the clinical applicability of the rule in a first-line care setting. Study Design and Setting: One thousand two hundred and sixty-two participants were enrolled in the study (participation: 91%) before a medical consultation for nonspecific back pain in a large emergency room and were followed up for 2 years (follow-up: 92.5%). The effects of adding new items and deleting any one of the original items were evaluated. The predictions by the rule and the physicians were compared with the 2-year actual functional limitations (measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire). Results: Although the final prediction rule included only five items (feeling everything is an effort, trouble getting breath, hot/cold spells, numbness/tingling in parts of body, and pain in heart/chest), its predictive validity was greater than that of the original 17-item version and was superior to the physician's prediction. The rule was easily applied. Conclusion: A five-item clinical prediction rule of long-term back-related functional limitations could help first-line care physicians to concentrate the clinical attention on patients at higher risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)54-66
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Prospective Studies
Physicians
Back Pain
Decision Support Techniques
Hypesthesia
Human Body
Hospital Emergency Service
Emotions
Thorax
Referral and Consultation
Pain
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Back pain
  • Clinical judgment
  • Clinical rules
  • Functional limitations
  • Prediction
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations : Evidence from three large prospective studies. / Dionne, Clermont E.; Le Sage, Natalie; Franche, Renée Louise; Dorval, Michel; Bombardier, Claire; Deyo, Richard (Rick).

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 54-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dionne, Clermont E. ; Le Sage, Natalie ; Franche, Renée Louise ; Dorval, Michel ; Bombardier, Claire ; Deyo, Richard (Rick). / Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations : Evidence from three large prospective studies. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 54-66.
@article{3fabc912481e4a42a8fdf5941bf1b1ee,
title = "Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations: Evidence from three large prospective studies",
abstract = "Objectives: The objectives of the study were as follows: (1) to investigate whether the predictive validity of a previously developed back pain prediction rule could be improved; (2) to determine if the rule can be shortened without loss of predictive validity; (3) to compare the rule with the physician's judgment; (4) to assess, in a different population, its 2-year predictive validity; and (5) to evaluate the clinical applicability of the rule in a first-line care setting. Study Design and Setting: One thousand two hundred and sixty-two participants were enrolled in the study (participation: 91{\%}) before a medical consultation for nonspecific back pain in a large emergency room and were followed up for 2 years (follow-up: 92.5{\%}). The effects of adding new items and deleting any one of the original items were evaluated. The predictions by the rule and the physicians were compared with the 2-year actual functional limitations (measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire). Results: Although the final prediction rule included only five items (feeling everything is an effort, trouble getting breath, hot/cold spells, numbness/tingling in parts of body, and pain in heart/chest), its predictive validity was greater than that of the original 17-item version and was superior to the physician's prediction. The rule was easily applied. Conclusion: A five-item clinical prediction rule of long-term back-related functional limitations could help first-line care physicians to concentrate the clinical attention on patients at higher risk.",
keywords = "Back pain, Clinical judgment, Clinical rules, Functional limitations, Prediction, Prognosis",
author = "Dionne, {Clermont E.} and {Le Sage}, Natalie and Franche, {Ren{\'e}e Louise} and Michel Dorval and Claire Bombardier and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "54--66",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Five questions predicted long-term, severe, back-related functional limitations

T2 - Evidence from three large prospective studies

AU - Dionne, Clermont E.

AU - Le Sage, Natalie

AU - Franche, Renée Louise

AU - Dorval, Michel

AU - Bombardier, Claire

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Objectives: The objectives of the study were as follows: (1) to investigate whether the predictive validity of a previously developed back pain prediction rule could be improved; (2) to determine if the rule can be shortened without loss of predictive validity; (3) to compare the rule with the physician's judgment; (4) to assess, in a different population, its 2-year predictive validity; and (5) to evaluate the clinical applicability of the rule in a first-line care setting. Study Design and Setting: One thousand two hundred and sixty-two participants were enrolled in the study (participation: 91%) before a medical consultation for nonspecific back pain in a large emergency room and were followed up for 2 years (follow-up: 92.5%). The effects of adding new items and deleting any one of the original items were evaluated. The predictions by the rule and the physicians were compared with the 2-year actual functional limitations (measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire). Results: Although the final prediction rule included only five items (feeling everything is an effort, trouble getting breath, hot/cold spells, numbness/tingling in parts of body, and pain in heart/chest), its predictive validity was greater than that of the original 17-item version and was superior to the physician's prediction. The rule was easily applied. Conclusion: A five-item clinical prediction rule of long-term back-related functional limitations could help first-line care physicians to concentrate the clinical attention on patients at higher risk.

AB - Objectives: The objectives of the study were as follows: (1) to investigate whether the predictive validity of a previously developed back pain prediction rule could be improved; (2) to determine if the rule can be shortened without loss of predictive validity; (3) to compare the rule with the physician's judgment; (4) to assess, in a different population, its 2-year predictive validity; and (5) to evaluate the clinical applicability of the rule in a first-line care setting. Study Design and Setting: One thousand two hundred and sixty-two participants were enrolled in the study (participation: 91%) before a medical consultation for nonspecific back pain in a large emergency room and were followed up for 2 years (follow-up: 92.5%). The effects of adding new items and deleting any one of the original items were evaluated. The predictions by the rule and the physicians were compared with the 2-year actual functional limitations (measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire). Results: Although the final prediction rule included only five items (feeling everything is an effort, trouble getting breath, hot/cold spells, numbness/tingling in parts of body, and pain in heart/chest), its predictive validity was greater than that of the original 17-item version and was superior to the physician's prediction. The rule was easily applied. Conclusion: A five-item clinical prediction rule of long-term back-related functional limitations could help first-line care physicians to concentrate the clinical attention on patients at higher risk.

KW - Back pain

KW - Clinical judgment

KW - Clinical rules

KW - Functional limitations

KW - Prediction

KW - Prognosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649839330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649839330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 20452744

AN - SCOPUS:78649839330

VL - 64

SP - 54

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 1

ER -