Field Triage Systems

Methodologies from the Literature

David C. Cone, Robert Benson, Terri Schmidt, N. Clay Mann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary goal of the Neely Conference project is to work toward defining a set of research criteria for medical necessity in emergency medical services (EMS). This paper reviews the extant literature on triage and nontransport decisions made in the field by EMS personnel, with emphasis on the methodologies that have been used to date. Two types of medical necessity standards are considered. First, there are triage criteria for determining whether a given patient requires EMS transport to the hospital, or whether an alternative might be appropriate. These triage criteria might be incorporated into protocols that field personnel could apply on scene to determine the best disposition for a given patient. Second, there are the outcome measures against which the decisions made by the field personnel are judged. In some cases, the outcome measure is the judgment of a reviewing emergency physician or nurse, while in others specific outcome measures are used to judge the performance of the criteria and the decision making of the field providers. While review of the literature shows that no "standard" set of triage criteria have been generated or validated in determining medical necessity in EMS, there are certain themes that emerge from the literature, and these themes can likely form the basis of a consensus on elements of a medical necessity criteria that need to be validated and refined. These may include (for triage criteria) vital signs, chief complaints, and physical exam findings, and (for outcome measures) hospital admission, critical events, death, and diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-137
Number of pages8
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Triage
Emergency Medical Services
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Vital Signs
Biomedical Research
Consensus
Decision Making
Emergencies
Nurses
Physicians

Keywords

  • Emergency medical services
  • Triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Field Triage Systems : Methodologies from the Literature. / Cone, David C.; Benson, Robert; Schmidt, Terri; Mann, N. Clay.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04.2004, p. 130-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cone, David C. ; Benson, Robert ; Schmidt, Terri ; Mann, N. Clay. / Field Triage Systems : Methodologies from the Literature. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2004 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 130-137.
@article{4053f834fe0a4cfe89e1357440b108bd,
title = "Field Triage Systems: Methodologies from the Literature",
abstract = "The primary goal of the Neely Conference project is to work toward defining a set of research criteria for medical necessity in emergency medical services (EMS). This paper reviews the extant literature on triage and nontransport decisions made in the field by EMS personnel, with emphasis on the methodologies that have been used to date. Two types of medical necessity standards are considered. First, there are triage criteria for determining whether a given patient requires EMS transport to the hospital, or whether an alternative might be appropriate. These triage criteria might be incorporated into protocols that field personnel could apply on scene to determine the best disposition for a given patient. Second, there are the outcome measures against which the decisions made by the field personnel are judged. In some cases, the outcome measure is the judgment of a reviewing emergency physician or nurse, while in others specific outcome measures are used to judge the performance of the criteria and the decision making of the field providers. While review of the literature shows that no {"}standard{"} set of triage criteria have been generated or validated in determining medical necessity in EMS, there are certain themes that emerge from the literature, and these themes can likely form the basis of a consensus on elements of a medical necessity criteria that need to be validated and refined. These may include (for triage criteria) vital signs, chief complaints, and physical exam findings, and (for outcome measures) hospital admission, critical events, death, and diagnosis.",
keywords = "Emergency medical services, Triage",
author = "Cone, {David C.} and Robert Benson and Terri Schmidt and Mann, {N. Clay}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "130--137",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Field Triage Systems

T2 - Methodologies from the Literature

AU - Cone, David C.

AU - Benson, Robert

AU - Schmidt, Terri

AU - Mann, N. Clay

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - The primary goal of the Neely Conference project is to work toward defining a set of research criteria for medical necessity in emergency medical services (EMS). This paper reviews the extant literature on triage and nontransport decisions made in the field by EMS personnel, with emphasis on the methodologies that have been used to date. Two types of medical necessity standards are considered. First, there are triage criteria for determining whether a given patient requires EMS transport to the hospital, or whether an alternative might be appropriate. These triage criteria might be incorporated into protocols that field personnel could apply on scene to determine the best disposition for a given patient. Second, there are the outcome measures against which the decisions made by the field personnel are judged. In some cases, the outcome measure is the judgment of a reviewing emergency physician or nurse, while in others specific outcome measures are used to judge the performance of the criteria and the decision making of the field providers. While review of the literature shows that no "standard" set of triage criteria have been generated or validated in determining medical necessity in EMS, there are certain themes that emerge from the literature, and these themes can likely form the basis of a consensus on elements of a medical necessity criteria that need to be validated and refined. These may include (for triage criteria) vital signs, chief complaints, and physical exam findings, and (for outcome measures) hospital admission, critical events, death, and diagnosis.

AB - The primary goal of the Neely Conference project is to work toward defining a set of research criteria for medical necessity in emergency medical services (EMS). This paper reviews the extant literature on triage and nontransport decisions made in the field by EMS personnel, with emphasis on the methodologies that have been used to date. Two types of medical necessity standards are considered. First, there are triage criteria for determining whether a given patient requires EMS transport to the hospital, or whether an alternative might be appropriate. These triage criteria might be incorporated into protocols that field personnel could apply on scene to determine the best disposition for a given patient. Second, there are the outcome measures against which the decisions made by the field personnel are judged. In some cases, the outcome measure is the judgment of a reviewing emergency physician or nurse, while in others specific outcome measures are used to judge the performance of the criteria and the decision making of the field providers. While review of the literature shows that no "standard" set of triage criteria have been generated or validated in determining medical necessity in EMS, there are certain themes that emerge from the literature, and these themes can likely form the basis of a consensus on elements of a medical necessity criteria that need to be validated and refined. These may include (for triage criteria) vital signs, chief complaints, and physical exam findings, and (for outcome measures) hospital admission, critical events, death, and diagnosis.

KW - Emergency medical services

KW - Triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16544381022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16544381022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.prehos.2003.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 130

EP - 137

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 2

ER -