Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Anne C. Porter; Jourdan E. Triebwasser; Methodius Tuuli; Aaron Caughey; George A. Macones; Alison G. Cahill

doi:10.1055/s-0036-1572531

Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Anne C. Porter, Jourdan E. Triebwasser, Methodius Tuuli, Aaron Caughey, George A. Macones, Alison G. Cahill

Obstetrics & Gynecology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective The article aimed to estimate differences in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) patterns in term gestations attributable to fetal sex. Study Design We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive, singleton, nonanomalous, term gestations that labored during admission. EFM characteristics in the 30 minutes prior to delivery were evaluated. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted risks for EFM features by sex. To further estimate the impact of sex, we limited the analysis to gestations without composite morbidity (morbidity defined as arterial cord pH

Original language	English (US)
Journal	American Journal of Perinatology
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1572531
State	Accepted/In press - Dec 16 2015

Keywords

electronic fetal monitoring
fetal sex
labor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Access to Document

10.1055/s-0036-1572531

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{49a81477add04a5494d7d55bb6872360,

title = "Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring",

abstract = " Objective The article aimed to estimate differences in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) patterns in term gestations attributable to fetal sex. Study Design We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive, singleton, nonanomalous, term gestations that labored during admission. EFM characteristics in the 30 minutes prior to delivery were evaluated. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted risks for EFM features by sex. To further estimate the impact of sex, we limited the analysis to gestations without composite morbidity (morbidity defined as arterial cord pH ",

keywords = "electronic fetal monitoring, fetal sex, labor",

author = "Porter, {Anne C.} and Triebwasser, {Jourdan E.} and Methodius Tuuli and Aaron Caughey and Macones, {George A.} and Cahill, {Alison G.}",

year = "2015",

month = dec,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1055/s-0036-1572531",

language = "English (US)",

journal = "American Journal of Perinatology",

issn = "0735-1631",

publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring

AU - Porter, Anne C.

AU - Triebwasser, Jourdan E.

AU - Tuuli, Methodius

AU - Caughey, Aaron

AU - Macones, George A.

AU - Cahill, Alison G.

PY - 2015/12/16

Y1 - 2015/12/16

N2 - Objective The article aimed to estimate differences in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) patterns in term gestations attributable to fetal sex. Study Design We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive, singleton, nonanomalous, term gestations that labored during admission. EFM characteristics in the 30 minutes prior to delivery were evaluated. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted risks for EFM features by sex. To further estimate the impact of sex, we limited the analysis to gestations without composite morbidity (morbidity defined as arterial cord pH

AB - Objective The article aimed to estimate differences in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) patterns in term gestations attributable to fetal sex. Study Design We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive, singleton, nonanomalous, term gestations that labored during admission. EFM characteristics in the 30 minutes prior to delivery were evaluated. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted risks for EFM features by sex. To further estimate the impact of sex, we limited the analysis to gestations without composite morbidity (morbidity defined as arterial cord pH

KW - electronic fetal monitoring

KW - fetal sex

KW - labor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959038735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959038735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0036-1572531

DO - 10.1055/s-0036-1572531

M3 - Article

C2 - 26906183

AN - SCOPUS:84959038735

JO - American Journal of Perinatology

JF - American Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0735-1631

ER -

Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this