TY - JOUR
T1 - Fellowship training in extracorporeal life support
T2 - Characterization and educational needs assessment
AU - Cook, Mackenzie R.
AU - Badulak, Jenelle
AU - Çoruh, Başak
AU - Kiraly, Laszlo
AU - Zonies, David
AU - Cuschieri, Joseph
AU - Bulger, Eileen M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Purpose: Adult Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) use is rapidly increasing. The structure of fellowship ECLS education is unknown. We sought to define current ECLS education and identify curricular needs. Materials and methods: An anonymous survey with Likert, binary and free response questions was sent to Critical Care Program Directors (CCPDs). Results: A total of 103 CCPDs responded, a response rate of 31. ECLS training was provided by 64% (66/103) of fellowships. Importantly, 50% (52/103) of CCPDs agreed or strongly agreed that fellows should be competent in ECLS and 70% (72/103) agreed or strongly agreed that ECLS will be an important part of critical care in the next 10 years. Only 28% (29/103) and 37% (38/103) of CCPDs agreed or strongly agreed their fellows could independently manage veno-arterial or veno-venous ECLS, respectively. Formal ECLS education was 5 h or less in 85% (88/103) of programs. Desired curricular improvements were: simulation 50% (51/103), patient volume 47% (48/103), and didactics 44% (45/103). Conclusions: CCPDs identified ECLS as a critical care skill, but believe that a minority of fellows are prepared for independent practice. Simulation, formal didactics and clinical volume are key needs. These data will guide the development of ECLS curriculum.
AB - Purpose: Adult Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) use is rapidly increasing. The structure of fellowship ECLS education is unknown. We sought to define current ECLS education and identify curricular needs. Materials and methods: An anonymous survey with Likert, binary and free response questions was sent to Critical Care Program Directors (CCPDs). Results: A total of 103 CCPDs responded, a response rate of 31. ECLS training was provided by 64% (66/103) of fellowships. Importantly, 50% (52/103) of CCPDs agreed or strongly agreed that fellows should be competent in ECLS and 70% (72/103) agreed or strongly agreed that ECLS will be an important part of critical care in the next 10 years. Only 28% (29/103) and 37% (38/103) of CCPDs agreed or strongly agreed their fellows could independently manage veno-arterial or veno-venous ECLS, respectively. Formal ECLS education was 5 h or less in 85% (88/103) of programs. Desired curricular improvements were: simulation 50% (51/103), patient volume 47% (48/103), and didactics 44% (45/103). Conclusions: CCPDs identified ECLS as a critical care skill, but believe that a minority of fellows are prepared for independent practice. Simulation, formal didactics and clinical volume are key needs. These data will guide the development of ECLS curriculum.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044512483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044512483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.023
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 29606413
AN - SCOPUS:85044512483
SN - 0883-9441
VL - 46
SP - 159
EP - 161
JO - Seminars in Anesthesia
JF - Seminars in Anesthesia
ER -