Feeding tubes and the prevention or healing of pressure ulcers

Joan Teno, Pedro Gozalo, Susan L. Mitchell, Sylvia Kuo, Ana T. Fulton, Vincent Mor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The evidence regarding the use of feeding tubes in persons with advanced dementia to prevent or heal pressure ulcers is conflicting. Using national data, we set out to determine whether percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes prevent or help heal pressure ulcers in nursing home (NH) residents with advanced cognitive impairment (ACI). Methods: A propensity-matched cohort study of NH residents with ACI and recent need for assistance in eating was conducted by matching each NH resident who had a feeding tube inserted during a hospitalization to 3 without a PEG tube inserted. Using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), we examined 2 outcomes: first, whether residents without a pressure ulcer developed a stage 2 or higher pressure ulcer (n=1124 with PEG insertion); and second, whether NH residents with a pressure ulcer (n=461) experienced improvement of the pressure ulcer by their first posthospitalization MDS assessment (mean [SD] time between evaluations, 24.6 [32.7] days). Results: Matched residents with and without a PEG insertion showed comparable sociodemographic characteristic, rates of feeding tube risk factors, and mortality. Adjusted for risk factors, hospitalizedNHresidents receiving a PEG tube were 2.27 times more likely to develop a new pressure ulcer(95%CI, 1.95-2.65). Conversely, those with a pressure ulcer were less likely to have the ulcer healwhen theyhadaPEGtubeinserted(OR0.70[95%CI, 0.55-0.89]). Conclusions: Feeding tubes are not associated with prevention or improved healing of a pressure ulcer. Rather, our findings suggest that the use of PEG tube is associated with increased risk of pressure ulcers amongNHresidents with ACI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-701
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume172
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - May 14 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pressure Ulcer
Enteral Nutrition
Gastrostomy
Nursing Homes
Ulcer
Dementia
Hospitalization
Cohort Studies
Eating
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Feeding tubes and the prevention or healing of pressure ulcers. / Teno, Joan; Gozalo, Pedro; Mitchell, Susan L.; Kuo, Sylvia; Fulton, Ana T.; Mor, Vincent.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 172, No. 9, 14.05.2012, p. 697-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Teno, J, Gozalo, P, Mitchell, SL, Kuo, S, Fulton, AT & Mor, V 2012, 'Feeding tubes and the prevention or healing of pressure ulcers', Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 172, no. 9, pp. 697-701. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1200
Teno, Joan ; Gozalo, Pedro ; Mitchell, Susan L. ; Kuo, Sylvia ; Fulton, Ana T. ; Mor, Vincent. / Feeding tubes and the prevention or healing of pressure ulcers. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 172, No. 9. pp. 697-701.
@article{2b7dd9eb0a344c0a85f7484bb93772c3,
title = "Feeding tubes and the prevention or healing of pressure ulcers",
abstract = "Background: The evidence regarding the use of feeding tubes in persons with advanced dementia to prevent or heal pressure ulcers is conflicting. Using national data, we set out to determine whether percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes prevent or help heal pressure ulcers in nursing home (NH) residents with advanced cognitive impairment (ACI). Methods: A propensity-matched cohort study of NH residents with ACI and recent need for assistance in eating was conducted by matching each NH resident who had a feeding tube inserted during a hospitalization to 3 without a PEG tube inserted. Using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), we examined 2 outcomes: first, whether residents without a pressure ulcer developed a stage 2 or higher pressure ulcer (n=1124 with PEG insertion); and second, whether NH residents with a pressure ulcer (n=461) experienced improvement of the pressure ulcer by their first posthospitalization MDS assessment (mean [SD] time between evaluations, 24.6 [32.7] days). Results: Matched residents with and without a PEG insertion showed comparable sociodemographic characteristic, rates of feeding tube risk factors, and mortality. Adjusted for risk factors, hospitalizedNHresidents receiving a PEG tube were 2.27 times more likely to develop a new pressure ulcer(95{\%}CI, 1.95-2.65). Conversely, those with a pressure ulcer were less likely to have the ulcer healwhen theyhadaPEGtubeinserted(OR0.70[95{\%}CI, 0.55-0.89]). Conclusions: Feeding tubes are not associated with prevention or improved healing of a pressure ulcer. Rather, our findings suggest that the use of PEG tube is associated with increased risk of pressure ulcers amongNHresidents with ACI.",
author = "Joan Teno and Pedro Gozalo and Mitchell, {Susan L.} and Sylvia Kuo and Fulton, {Ana T.} and Vincent Mor",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "697--701",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feeding tubes and the prevention or healing of pressure ulcers

AU - Teno, Joan

AU - Gozalo, Pedro

AU - Mitchell, Susan L.

AU - Kuo, Sylvia

AU - Fulton, Ana T.

AU - Mor, Vincent

PY - 2012/5/14

Y1 - 2012/5/14

N2 - Background: The evidence regarding the use of feeding tubes in persons with advanced dementia to prevent or heal pressure ulcers is conflicting. Using national data, we set out to determine whether percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes prevent or help heal pressure ulcers in nursing home (NH) residents with advanced cognitive impairment (ACI). Methods: A propensity-matched cohort study of NH residents with ACI and recent need for assistance in eating was conducted by matching each NH resident who had a feeding tube inserted during a hospitalization to 3 without a PEG tube inserted. Using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), we examined 2 outcomes: first, whether residents without a pressure ulcer developed a stage 2 or higher pressure ulcer (n=1124 with PEG insertion); and second, whether NH residents with a pressure ulcer (n=461) experienced improvement of the pressure ulcer by their first posthospitalization MDS assessment (mean [SD] time between evaluations, 24.6 [32.7] days). Results: Matched residents with and without a PEG insertion showed comparable sociodemographic characteristic, rates of feeding tube risk factors, and mortality. Adjusted for risk factors, hospitalizedNHresidents receiving a PEG tube were 2.27 times more likely to develop a new pressure ulcer(95%CI, 1.95-2.65). Conversely, those with a pressure ulcer were less likely to have the ulcer healwhen theyhadaPEGtubeinserted(OR0.70[95%CI, 0.55-0.89]). Conclusions: Feeding tubes are not associated with prevention or improved healing of a pressure ulcer. Rather, our findings suggest that the use of PEG tube is associated with increased risk of pressure ulcers amongNHresidents with ACI.

AB - Background: The evidence regarding the use of feeding tubes in persons with advanced dementia to prevent or heal pressure ulcers is conflicting. Using national data, we set out to determine whether percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes prevent or help heal pressure ulcers in nursing home (NH) residents with advanced cognitive impairment (ACI). Methods: A propensity-matched cohort study of NH residents with ACI and recent need for assistance in eating was conducted by matching each NH resident who had a feeding tube inserted during a hospitalization to 3 without a PEG tube inserted. Using the Minimum Data Set (MDS), we examined 2 outcomes: first, whether residents without a pressure ulcer developed a stage 2 or higher pressure ulcer (n=1124 with PEG insertion); and second, whether NH residents with a pressure ulcer (n=461) experienced improvement of the pressure ulcer by their first posthospitalization MDS assessment (mean [SD] time between evaluations, 24.6 [32.7] days). Results: Matched residents with and without a PEG insertion showed comparable sociodemographic characteristic, rates of feeding tube risk factors, and mortality. Adjusted for risk factors, hospitalizedNHresidents receiving a PEG tube were 2.27 times more likely to develop a new pressure ulcer(95%CI, 1.95-2.65). Conversely, those with a pressure ulcer were less likely to have the ulcer healwhen theyhadaPEGtubeinserted(OR0.70[95%CI, 0.55-0.89]). Conclusions: Feeding tubes are not associated with prevention or improved healing of a pressure ulcer. Rather, our findings suggest that the use of PEG tube is associated with increased risk of pressure ulcers amongNHresidents with ACI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861173115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861173115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1200

DO - 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1200

M3 - Article

VL - 172

SP - 697

EP - 701

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 9

ER -